Cargando…

Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?

BACKGROUND: Standardization and digitalization are getting more and more essential in surgery. Surgical procedure manager (SPM®) is a freestanding computer serving as a digital supporter in the operating room. SPM® navigates step-by-step through surgery by providing a checklist for each individual s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strobel, Rahel M., Schineis, Christian H. W., Lasierra Viguri, Leyre, Stroux, Andrea, Eschlböck, Sophie M., Lobbes, Leonard A., Pozios, Ioannis, Seifarth, Claudia, Weixler, Benjamin, Kamphues, Carsten, Beyer, Katharina, Lauscher, Johannes C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1141017
_version_ 1785067981336739840
author Strobel, Rahel M.
Schineis, Christian H. W.
Lasierra Viguri, Leyre
Stroux, Andrea
Eschlböck, Sophie M.
Lobbes, Leonard A.
Pozios, Ioannis
Seifarth, Claudia
Weixler, Benjamin
Kamphues, Carsten
Beyer, Katharina
Lauscher, Johannes C.
author_facet Strobel, Rahel M.
Schineis, Christian H. W.
Lasierra Viguri, Leyre
Stroux, Andrea
Eschlböck, Sophie M.
Lobbes, Leonard A.
Pozios, Ioannis
Seifarth, Claudia
Weixler, Benjamin
Kamphues, Carsten
Beyer, Katharina
Lauscher, Johannes C.
author_sort Strobel, Rahel M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardization and digitalization are getting more and more essential in surgery. Surgical procedure manager (SPM®) is a freestanding computer serving as a digital supporter in the operating room. SPM® navigates step-by-step through surgery by providing a checklist for each individual step. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective study at the Department for General and Visceral Surgery at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. Patients who underwent ileostomy reversal without SPM® in the period of January 2017 until December 2017 were compared to patients who were operated with SPM® in the period of June 2018 until July 2020. Explorative analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients underwent ileostomy reversal: 95 patients without SPM® vs. 119 patients with SPM®. Ileostomy reversal was performed by head of department/attendings in 34.1%, by fellows in 28.5% and by residents in 37.4%; p = 0.91. Postoperative intraabdominal abscess emerged more often in patients without SPM®: ten (10.5%) patients vs. four (3.4%) patients; p = 0.035. Multiple logistic regression showed a risk reduction for intraabdominal abscess {Odds ratio (OR) 0.19 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.71]; p = 0.014} and for bowel perforation [OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.93); p = 0.043] in the group with use of SPM® in ileostomy reversal. CONCLUSIONS: SPM® may reduce postoperative complications in ileostomy reversal such as intraabdominal abscess and bowel perforation. SPM® may contribute to patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10318182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103181822023-07-05 Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? Strobel, Rahel M. Schineis, Christian H. W. Lasierra Viguri, Leyre Stroux, Andrea Eschlböck, Sophie M. Lobbes, Leonard A. Pozios, Ioannis Seifarth, Claudia Weixler, Benjamin Kamphues, Carsten Beyer, Katharina Lauscher, Johannes C. Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Standardization and digitalization are getting more and more essential in surgery. Surgical procedure manager (SPM®) is a freestanding computer serving as a digital supporter in the operating room. SPM® navigates step-by-step through surgery by providing a checklist for each individual step. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective study at the Department for General and Visceral Surgery at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. Patients who underwent ileostomy reversal without SPM® in the period of January 2017 until December 2017 were compared to patients who were operated with SPM® in the period of June 2018 until July 2020. Explorative analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients underwent ileostomy reversal: 95 patients without SPM® vs. 119 patients with SPM®. Ileostomy reversal was performed by head of department/attendings in 34.1%, by fellows in 28.5% and by residents in 37.4%; p = 0.91. Postoperative intraabdominal abscess emerged more often in patients without SPM®: ten (10.5%) patients vs. four (3.4%) patients; p = 0.035. Multiple logistic regression showed a risk reduction for intraabdominal abscess {Odds ratio (OR) 0.19 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.71]; p = 0.014} and for bowel perforation [OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.93); p = 0.043] in the group with use of SPM® in ileostomy reversal. CONCLUSIONS: SPM® may reduce postoperative complications in ileostomy reversal such as intraabdominal abscess and bowel perforation. SPM® may contribute to patient safety. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10318182/ /pubmed/37409070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1141017 Text en © 2023 Strobel, Schineis, Lassiera Viguri, Stroux, Eschlböck, Lobbes, Pozios, Seifarth, Weixler, Kamphues, Beyer and Lauscher. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Strobel, Rahel M.
Schineis, Christian H. W.
Lasierra Viguri, Leyre
Stroux, Andrea
Eschlböck, Sophie M.
Lobbes, Leonard A.
Pozios, Ioannis
Seifarth, Claudia
Weixler, Benjamin
Kamphues, Carsten
Beyer, Katharina
Lauscher, Johannes C.
Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
title Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
title_full Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
title_fullStr Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
title_full_unstemmed Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
title_short Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
title_sort standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (spm®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1141017
work_keys_str_mv AT strobelrahelm standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT schineischristianhw standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT lasierravigurileyre standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT strouxandrea standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT eschlbocksophiem standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT lobbesleonarda standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT poziosioannis standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT seifarthclaudia standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT weixlerbenjamin standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT kamphuescarsten standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT beyerkatharina standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal
AT lauscherjohannesc standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal