Cargando…
Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal?
BACKGROUND: Standardization and digitalization are getting more and more essential in surgery. Surgical procedure manager (SPM®) is a freestanding computer serving as a digital supporter in the operating room. SPM® navigates step-by-step through surgery by providing a checklist for each individual s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1141017 |
_version_ | 1785067981336739840 |
---|---|
author | Strobel, Rahel M. Schineis, Christian H. W. Lasierra Viguri, Leyre Stroux, Andrea Eschlböck, Sophie M. Lobbes, Leonard A. Pozios, Ioannis Seifarth, Claudia Weixler, Benjamin Kamphues, Carsten Beyer, Katharina Lauscher, Johannes C. |
author_facet | Strobel, Rahel M. Schineis, Christian H. W. Lasierra Viguri, Leyre Stroux, Andrea Eschlböck, Sophie M. Lobbes, Leonard A. Pozios, Ioannis Seifarth, Claudia Weixler, Benjamin Kamphues, Carsten Beyer, Katharina Lauscher, Johannes C. |
author_sort | Strobel, Rahel M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standardization and digitalization are getting more and more essential in surgery. Surgical procedure manager (SPM®) is a freestanding computer serving as a digital supporter in the operating room. SPM® navigates step-by-step through surgery by providing a checklist for each individual step. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective study at the Department for General and Visceral Surgery at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. Patients who underwent ileostomy reversal without SPM® in the period of January 2017 until December 2017 were compared to patients who were operated with SPM® in the period of June 2018 until July 2020. Explorative analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients underwent ileostomy reversal: 95 patients without SPM® vs. 119 patients with SPM®. Ileostomy reversal was performed by head of department/attendings in 34.1%, by fellows in 28.5% and by residents in 37.4%; p = 0.91. Postoperative intraabdominal abscess emerged more often in patients without SPM®: ten (10.5%) patients vs. four (3.4%) patients; p = 0.035. Multiple logistic regression showed a risk reduction for intraabdominal abscess {Odds ratio (OR) 0.19 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.71]; p = 0.014} and for bowel perforation [OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.93); p = 0.043] in the group with use of SPM® in ileostomy reversal. CONCLUSIONS: SPM® may reduce postoperative complications in ileostomy reversal such as intraabdominal abscess and bowel perforation. SPM® may contribute to patient safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10318182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103181822023-07-05 Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? Strobel, Rahel M. Schineis, Christian H. W. Lasierra Viguri, Leyre Stroux, Andrea Eschlböck, Sophie M. Lobbes, Leonard A. Pozios, Ioannis Seifarth, Claudia Weixler, Benjamin Kamphues, Carsten Beyer, Katharina Lauscher, Johannes C. Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Standardization and digitalization are getting more and more essential in surgery. Surgical procedure manager (SPM®) is a freestanding computer serving as a digital supporter in the operating room. SPM® navigates step-by-step through surgery by providing a checklist for each individual step. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective study at the Department for General and Visceral Surgery at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. Patients who underwent ileostomy reversal without SPM® in the period of January 2017 until December 2017 were compared to patients who were operated with SPM® in the period of June 2018 until July 2020. Explorative analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients underwent ileostomy reversal: 95 patients without SPM® vs. 119 patients with SPM®. Ileostomy reversal was performed by head of department/attendings in 34.1%, by fellows in 28.5% and by residents in 37.4%; p = 0.91. Postoperative intraabdominal abscess emerged more often in patients without SPM®: ten (10.5%) patients vs. four (3.4%) patients; p = 0.035. Multiple logistic regression showed a risk reduction for intraabdominal abscess {Odds ratio (OR) 0.19 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.71]; p = 0.014} and for bowel perforation [OR 0.09 (95% CI 0.01–0.93); p = 0.043] in the group with use of SPM® in ileostomy reversal. CONCLUSIONS: SPM® may reduce postoperative complications in ileostomy reversal such as intraabdominal abscess and bowel perforation. SPM® may contribute to patient safety. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10318182/ /pubmed/37409070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1141017 Text en © 2023 Strobel, Schineis, Lassiera Viguri, Stroux, Eschlböck, Lobbes, Pozios, Seifarth, Weixler, Kamphues, Beyer and Lauscher. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Strobel, Rahel M. Schineis, Christian H. W. Lasierra Viguri, Leyre Stroux, Andrea Eschlböck, Sophie M. Lobbes, Leonard A. Pozios, Ioannis Seifarth, Claudia Weixler, Benjamin Kamphues, Carsten Beyer, Katharina Lauscher, Johannes C. Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? |
title | Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? |
title_full | Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? |
title_fullStr | Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? |
title_short | Standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (SPM®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? |
title_sort | standardized digital solution with surgical procedure manager (spm®)—an opportunity for maximizing patient safety and efficiency in ileostomy reversal? |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1141017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strobelrahelm standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT schineischristianhw standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT lasierravigurileyre standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT strouxandrea standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT eschlbocksophiem standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT lobbesleonarda standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT poziosioannis standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT seifarthclaudia standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT weixlerbenjamin standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT kamphuescarsten standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT beyerkatharina standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal AT lauscherjohannesc standardizeddigitalsolutionwithsurgicalproceduremanagerspmanopportunityformaximizingpatientsafetyandefficiencyinileostomyreversal |