Cargando…
Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients
PURPOSE: This study compared craniospinal irradiation using proton beam therapy (PBT) according to irradiation method and investigated the initial effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four pediatric patients (1-24 years old) who received proton craniospinal irradiation were examined. Passive scatt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101251 |
_version_ | 1785067989559672832 |
---|---|
author | Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Kubota, Hikaru Mima, Masayuki Demizu, Yusuke Suzuki, Takeshi Hasegawa, Daiichiro Kosaka, Yoshiyuki Kawamura, Atsufumi Soejima, Toshinori |
author_facet | Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Kubota, Hikaru Mima, Masayuki Demizu, Yusuke Suzuki, Takeshi Hasegawa, Daiichiro Kosaka, Yoshiyuki Kawamura, Atsufumi Soejima, Toshinori |
author_sort | Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study compared craniospinal irradiation using proton beam therapy (PBT) according to irradiation method and investigated the initial effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four pediatric patients (1-24 years old) who received proton craniospinal irradiation were examined. Passive scattered PBT (PSPT) and intensity modulated PBT (IMPT) were used in 8 and 16 patients, respectively. The whole vertebral body technique was used for 13 patients <10 years old, and the vertebral body sparing (VBS) technique was used for the remaining 11 patients aged ≥10 years. The follow-up period was 17 to 44 (median, 27) months. Organ-at-risk and planning target volume (PTV) doses and other clinical data were examined. RESULTS: The maximum lens dose using IMPT was lower than that using PSPT (P = .008). The mean thyroid, lung, esophagus, and kidney doses were lower in patients treated using the VBS technique compared with the whole vertebral body technique (all P < .001). The minimum PTV dose of IMPT was higher than that of PSPT (P = .01). The inhomogeneity index of IMPT was lower than that of PSPT (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: IMPT is better than PSPT at reducing the dose to the lens. The VBS technique can decrease the doses to neck-chest-abdomen organs. The PTV coverage of IMPT is superior to that of PSPT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10318217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103182172023-07-05 Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Kubota, Hikaru Mima, Masayuki Demizu, Yusuke Suzuki, Takeshi Hasegawa, Daiichiro Kosaka, Yoshiyuki Kawamura, Atsufumi Soejima, Toshinori Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: This study compared craniospinal irradiation using proton beam therapy (PBT) according to irradiation method and investigated the initial effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four pediatric patients (1-24 years old) who received proton craniospinal irradiation were examined. Passive scattered PBT (PSPT) and intensity modulated PBT (IMPT) were used in 8 and 16 patients, respectively. The whole vertebral body technique was used for 13 patients <10 years old, and the vertebral body sparing (VBS) technique was used for the remaining 11 patients aged ≥10 years. The follow-up period was 17 to 44 (median, 27) months. Organ-at-risk and planning target volume (PTV) doses and other clinical data were examined. RESULTS: The maximum lens dose using IMPT was lower than that using PSPT (P = .008). The mean thyroid, lung, esophagus, and kidney doses were lower in patients treated using the VBS technique compared with the whole vertebral body technique (all P < .001). The minimum PTV dose of IMPT was higher than that of PSPT (P = .01). The inhomogeneity index of IMPT was lower than that of PSPT (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: IMPT is better than PSPT at reducing the dose to the lens. The VBS technique can decrease the doses to neck-chest-abdomen organs. The PTV coverage of IMPT is superior to that of PSPT. Elsevier 2023-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10318217/ /pubmed/37408669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101251 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Kubota, Hikaru Mima, Masayuki Demizu, Yusuke Suzuki, Takeshi Hasegawa, Daiichiro Kosaka, Yoshiyuki Kawamura, Atsufumi Soejima, Toshinori Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients |
title | Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients |
title_full | Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients |
title_short | Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients |
title_sort | comparison of craniospinal irradiation using proton beams according to irradiation method and initial experience treating pediatric patients |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fukumitsunobuyoshi comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT kubotahikaru comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT mimamasayuki comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT demizuyusuke comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT suzukitakeshi comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT hasegawadaiichiro comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT kosakayoshiyuki comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT kawamuraatsufumi comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients AT soejimatoshinori comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients |