Cargando…

Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients

PURPOSE: This study compared craniospinal irradiation using proton beam therapy (PBT) according to irradiation method and investigated the initial effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four pediatric patients (1-24 years old) who received proton craniospinal irradiation were examined. Passive scatt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi, Kubota, Hikaru, Mima, Masayuki, Demizu, Yusuke, Suzuki, Takeshi, Hasegawa, Daiichiro, Kosaka, Yoshiyuki, Kawamura, Atsufumi, Soejima, Toshinori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101251
_version_ 1785067989559672832
author Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi
Kubota, Hikaru
Mima, Masayuki
Demizu, Yusuke
Suzuki, Takeshi
Hasegawa, Daiichiro
Kosaka, Yoshiyuki
Kawamura, Atsufumi
Soejima, Toshinori
author_facet Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi
Kubota, Hikaru
Mima, Masayuki
Demizu, Yusuke
Suzuki, Takeshi
Hasegawa, Daiichiro
Kosaka, Yoshiyuki
Kawamura, Atsufumi
Soejima, Toshinori
author_sort Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study compared craniospinal irradiation using proton beam therapy (PBT) according to irradiation method and investigated the initial effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four pediatric patients (1-24 years old) who received proton craniospinal irradiation were examined. Passive scattered PBT (PSPT) and intensity modulated PBT (IMPT) were used in 8 and 16 patients, respectively. The whole vertebral body technique was used for 13 patients <10 years old, and the vertebral body sparing (VBS) technique was used for the remaining 11 patients aged ≥10 years. The follow-up period was 17 to 44 (median, 27) months. Organ-at-risk and planning target volume (PTV) doses and other clinical data were examined. RESULTS: The maximum lens dose using IMPT was lower than that using PSPT (P = .008). The mean thyroid, lung, esophagus, and kidney doses were lower in patients treated using the VBS technique compared with the whole vertebral body technique (all P < .001). The minimum PTV dose of IMPT was higher than that of PSPT (P = .01). The inhomogeneity index of IMPT was lower than that of PSPT (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: IMPT is better than PSPT at reducing the dose to the lens. The VBS technique can decrease the doses to neck-chest-abdomen organs. The PTV coverage of IMPT is superior to that of PSPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10318217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103182172023-07-05 Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi Kubota, Hikaru Mima, Masayuki Demizu, Yusuke Suzuki, Takeshi Hasegawa, Daiichiro Kosaka, Yoshiyuki Kawamura, Atsufumi Soejima, Toshinori Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: This study compared craniospinal irradiation using proton beam therapy (PBT) according to irradiation method and investigated the initial effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four pediatric patients (1-24 years old) who received proton craniospinal irradiation were examined. Passive scattered PBT (PSPT) and intensity modulated PBT (IMPT) were used in 8 and 16 patients, respectively. The whole vertebral body technique was used for 13 patients <10 years old, and the vertebral body sparing (VBS) technique was used for the remaining 11 patients aged ≥10 years. The follow-up period was 17 to 44 (median, 27) months. Organ-at-risk and planning target volume (PTV) doses and other clinical data were examined. RESULTS: The maximum lens dose using IMPT was lower than that using PSPT (P = .008). The mean thyroid, lung, esophagus, and kidney doses were lower in patients treated using the VBS technique compared with the whole vertebral body technique (all P < .001). The minimum PTV dose of IMPT was higher than that of PSPT (P = .01). The inhomogeneity index of IMPT was lower than that of PSPT (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: IMPT is better than PSPT at reducing the dose to the lens. The VBS technique can decrease the doses to neck-chest-abdomen organs. The PTV coverage of IMPT is superior to that of PSPT. Elsevier 2023-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10318217/ /pubmed/37408669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101251 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi
Kubota, Hikaru
Mima, Masayuki
Demizu, Yusuke
Suzuki, Takeshi
Hasegawa, Daiichiro
Kosaka, Yoshiyuki
Kawamura, Atsufumi
Soejima, Toshinori
Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients
title Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients
title_full Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients
title_short Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Proton Beams According to Irradiation Method and Initial Experience Treating Pediatric Patients
title_sort comparison of craniospinal irradiation using proton beams according to irradiation method and initial experience treating pediatric patients
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2023.101251
work_keys_str_mv AT fukumitsunobuyoshi comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT kubotahikaru comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT mimamasayuki comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT demizuyusuke comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT suzukitakeshi comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT hasegawadaiichiro comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT kosakayoshiyuki comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT kawamuraatsufumi comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients
AT soejimatoshinori comparisonofcraniospinalirradiationusingprotonbeamsaccordingtoirradiationmethodandinitialexperiencetreatingpediatricpatients