Cargando…

Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and technical considerations of flow diverter (FD) treatment using a Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suh, Dae Chul, Song, Yunsun, Park, Sang Ik, Kwon, Boseong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337396
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2023.00199
_version_ 1785067990773923840
author Suh, Dae Chul
Song, Yunsun
Park, Sang Ik
Kwon, Boseong
author_facet Suh, Dae Chul
Song, Yunsun
Park, Sang Ik
Kwon, Boseong
author_sort Suh, Dae Chul
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and technical considerations of flow diverter (FD) treatment using a Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 23 patients with unruptured intracranial VADAs who underwent FD treatment using a FRED between June 2017 and August 2021. Symptoms, imaging findings, treatment strategies, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Dissections were categorized according to the dominance of the VA in which they occurred: dominant VA, co-dominant VA, and non-dominant VA. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent FD treatment with either a FRED (n=11) or FRED Jr. (n=12). Complete occlusion rates were 78.3% at 6-month follow-up magnetic resonance angiography and 91.3% at 12-month. There were no instances of complications, recurrence, or retreatment during a median follow-up of 20 months. Dissections occurred in the dominant VA in 3 cases (13.0%), the co-dominant VA in 13 cases (56.5%), and the non-dominant VA in 7 cases (30.4%). Intimal flap and true lumen stenosis were observed in 39.1% and 30.4% of cases, respectively. Four cases required a bilateral VA approach due to technical difficulties, all in the non-dominant VA. CONCLUSION: Flow diversion treatment using a FRED for unruptured intracranial VADAs proved feasible and safe, yielding satisfactory occlusion rates. Technical challenges were more likely in lesions involving non-dominant VAs in the acute or subacute stage, mainly due to associated intraluminal lesions compromising the arterial lumen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10318222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103182222023-07-05 Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations Suh, Dae Chul Song, Yunsun Park, Sang Ik Kwon, Boseong Neurointervention Original Paper PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and technical considerations of flow diverter (FD) treatment using a Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 23 patients with unruptured intracranial VADAs who underwent FD treatment using a FRED between June 2017 and August 2021. Symptoms, imaging findings, treatment strategies, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Dissections were categorized according to the dominance of the VA in which they occurred: dominant VA, co-dominant VA, and non-dominant VA. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent FD treatment with either a FRED (n=11) or FRED Jr. (n=12). Complete occlusion rates were 78.3% at 6-month follow-up magnetic resonance angiography and 91.3% at 12-month. There were no instances of complications, recurrence, or retreatment during a median follow-up of 20 months. Dissections occurred in the dominant VA in 3 cases (13.0%), the co-dominant VA in 13 cases (56.5%), and the non-dominant VA in 7 cases (30.4%). Intimal flap and true lumen stenosis were observed in 39.1% and 30.4% of cases, respectively. Four cases required a bilateral VA approach due to technical difficulties, all in the non-dominant VA. CONCLUSION: Flow diversion treatment using a FRED for unruptured intracranial VADAs proved feasible and safe, yielding satisfactory occlusion rates. Technical challenges were more likely in lesions involving non-dominant VAs in the acute or subacute stage, mainly due to associated intraluminal lesions compromising the arterial lumen. Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2023-07 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10318222/ /pubmed/37337396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2023.00199 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Suh, Dae Chul
Song, Yunsun
Park, Sang Ik
Kwon, Boseong
Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations
title Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations
title_full Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations
title_fullStr Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations
title_short Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations
title_sort flow diverter treatment using a flow re-direction endoluminal device for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm: single-center case series and technical considerations
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337396
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2023.00199
work_keys_str_mv AT suhdaechul flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations
AT songyunsun flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations
AT parksangik flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations
AT kwonboseong flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations