Cargando…
Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and technical considerations of flow diverter (FD) treatment using a Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2023.00199 |
_version_ | 1785067990773923840 |
---|---|
author | Suh, Dae Chul Song, Yunsun Park, Sang Ik Kwon, Boseong |
author_facet | Suh, Dae Chul Song, Yunsun Park, Sang Ik Kwon, Boseong |
author_sort | Suh, Dae Chul |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and technical considerations of flow diverter (FD) treatment using a Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 23 patients with unruptured intracranial VADAs who underwent FD treatment using a FRED between June 2017 and August 2021. Symptoms, imaging findings, treatment strategies, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Dissections were categorized according to the dominance of the VA in which they occurred: dominant VA, co-dominant VA, and non-dominant VA. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent FD treatment with either a FRED (n=11) or FRED Jr. (n=12). Complete occlusion rates were 78.3% at 6-month follow-up magnetic resonance angiography and 91.3% at 12-month. There were no instances of complications, recurrence, or retreatment during a median follow-up of 20 months. Dissections occurred in the dominant VA in 3 cases (13.0%), the co-dominant VA in 13 cases (56.5%), and the non-dominant VA in 7 cases (30.4%). Intimal flap and true lumen stenosis were observed in 39.1% and 30.4% of cases, respectively. Four cases required a bilateral VA approach due to technical difficulties, all in the non-dominant VA. CONCLUSION: Flow diversion treatment using a FRED for unruptured intracranial VADAs proved feasible and safe, yielding satisfactory occlusion rates. Technical challenges were more likely in lesions involving non-dominant VAs in the acute or subacute stage, mainly due to associated intraluminal lesions compromising the arterial lumen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10318222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103182222023-07-05 Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations Suh, Dae Chul Song, Yunsun Park, Sang Ik Kwon, Boseong Neurointervention Original Paper PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and technical considerations of flow diverter (FD) treatment using a Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 23 patients with unruptured intracranial VADAs who underwent FD treatment using a FRED between June 2017 and August 2021. Symptoms, imaging findings, treatment strategies, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Dissections were categorized according to the dominance of the VA in which they occurred: dominant VA, co-dominant VA, and non-dominant VA. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent FD treatment with either a FRED (n=11) or FRED Jr. (n=12). Complete occlusion rates were 78.3% at 6-month follow-up magnetic resonance angiography and 91.3% at 12-month. There were no instances of complications, recurrence, or retreatment during a median follow-up of 20 months. Dissections occurred in the dominant VA in 3 cases (13.0%), the co-dominant VA in 13 cases (56.5%), and the non-dominant VA in 7 cases (30.4%). Intimal flap and true lumen stenosis were observed in 39.1% and 30.4% of cases, respectively. Four cases required a bilateral VA approach due to technical difficulties, all in the non-dominant VA. CONCLUSION: Flow diversion treatment using a FRED for unruptured intracranial VADAs proved feasible and safe, yielding satisfactory occlusion rates. Technical challenges were more likely in lesions involving non-dominant VAs in the acute or subacute stage, mainly due to associated intraluminal lesions compromising the arterial lumen. Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2023-07 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10318222/ /pubmed/37337396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2023.00199 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Suh, Dae Chul Song, Yunsun Park, Sang Ik Kwon, Boseong Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations |
title | Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations |
title_full | Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations |
title_fullStr | Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations |
title_short | Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations |
title_sort | flow diverter treatment using a flow re-direction endoluminal device for unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm: single-center case series and technical considerations |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2023.00199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suhdaechul flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations AT songyunsun flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations AT parksangik flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations AT kwonboseong flowdivertertreatmentusingaflowredirectionendoluminaldeviceforunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysmsinglecentercaseseriesandtechnicalconsiderations |