Cargando…

Stratified Analysis of Survival Benefit for ABO-incompatible Deceased-donor Liver Transplantation: Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver transplantation (LT) using ABO-incompatible (ABOi) grafts can extend the donor pool to a certain extent and hence reduce the waiting time for transplantation. However, concerns of the impending prognosis associated with this option, especially for patients with liver failu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Mengfan, Wei, Xuyong, Khan, Abdul Rehman, Wei, Qiang, Wang, Rui, Pan, Binhua, Wang, Kun, Zhou, Zhisheng, Lu, Di, Cen, Beini, Zhang, Shuijun, Guo, Wenzhi, Zheng, Shusen, Yang, Yang, Xu, Xiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: XIA & HE Publishing Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408815
http://dx.doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2022.00297
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver transplantation (LT) using ABO-incompatible (ABOi) grafts can extend the donor pool to a certain extent and hence reduce the waiting time for transplantation. However, concerns of the impending prognosis associated with this option, especially for patients with liver failure and higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, who tend to be more fragile during the waiting period before LT. METHODS: Recipients undergoing LT for acute-on-chronic liver failure or acute liver failure were retrospectively enrolled at four institutions. Overall survival was compared and a Cox regression analysis was performed. Propensity score matching was performed for further comparison. Patients were stratified by MELD score and cold ischemia time (CIT) to determine the subgroups with survival benefits. RESULTS: Two hundred ten recipients who underwent ABOi LT and 1,829 who underwent ABO compatible (ABOc) LT were enrolled. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly inferior in the ABOi group compared with the ABOc group after matching (50.6% vs. 75.7%, p<0.05). For patients with MELD scores ≤30, using ABOi grafts achieved a comparable overall survival rate as using ABOc grafts (p>0.05). Comparison of the survival rates revealed no statistically significant difference for patients with MELD scores ≥40 (p>0.05). For patients with MELD scores of 31–39, the overall survival rate was significantly inferior in the ABOi group compared with the ABOc group (p<0.001); however, the rate was increased when the liver graft CIT was<8 h. CONCLUSIONS: For recipients with MELD scores ≤30, ABOi LT had a prognosis comparable to that of ABOc LT and can be regarded as a feasible option. For recipients with MELD scores ≥40, ABOi should be adopted with caution in emergency cases. For recipients with MELD scores of 31–39, the ABOi LT prognosis was worse. However, those patients benefited from receiving ABOi grafts with a CIT of <8 h.