Cargando…
Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?
Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001 |
_version_ | 1785068011600740352 |
---|---|
author | Ge, Naijian Wang, Hongbo He, Chengjian Wang, Xiangdong Huang, Jian Yang, Yefa |
author_facet | Ge, Naijian Wang, Hongbo He, Chengjian Wang, Xiangdong Huang, Jian Yang, Yefa |
author_sort | Ge, Naijian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10318322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103183222023-07-05 Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? Ge, Naijian Wang, Hongbo He, Chengjian Wang, Xiangdong Huang, Jian Yang, Yefa J Interv Med Article Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools. Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10318322/ /pubmed/37409063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001 Text en © 2023 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ge, Naijian Wang, Hongbo He, Chengjian Wang, Xiangdong Huang, Jian Yang, Yefa Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? |
title | Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? |
title_full | Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? |
title_fullStr | Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? |
title_short | Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? |
title_sort | optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: haic, tace or itace? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT genaijian optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace AT wanghongbo optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace AT hechengjian optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace AT wangxiangdong optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace AT huangjian optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace AT yangyefa optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace |