Cargando…

Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?

Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Naijian, Wang, Hongbo, He, Chengjian, Wang, Xiangdong, Huang, Jian, Yang, Yefa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001
_version_ 1785068011600740352
author Ge, Naijian
Wang, Hongbo
He, Chengjian
Wang, Xiangdong
Huang, Jian
Yang, Yefa
author_facet Ge, Naijian
Wang, Hongbo
He, Chengjian
Wang, Xiangdong
Huang, Jian
Yang, Yefa
author_sort Ge, Naijian
collection PubMed
description Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10318322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103183222023-07-05 Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE? Ge, Naijian Wang, Hongbo He, Chengjian Wang, Xiangdong Huang, Jian Yang, Yefa J Interv Med Article Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools. Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10318322/ /pubmed/37409063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001 Text en © 2023 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ge, Naijian
Wang, Hongbo
He, Chengjian
Wang, Xiangdong
Huang, Jian
Yang, Yefa
Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?
title Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?
title_full Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?
title_fullStr Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?
title_full_unstemmed Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?
title_short Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?
title_sort optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: haic, tace or itace?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT genaijian optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace
AT wanghongbo optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace
AT hechengjian optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace
AT wangxiangdong optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace
AT huangjian optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace
AT yangyefa optimalinterventionaltreatmentforlivercancerhaictaceoritace