Cargando…
Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no data from randomized trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost in women at high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the toxicity and oncological outcome of IORT or simultaneous integrat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1210879 |
_version_ | 1785068029102522368 |
---|---|
author | Stoian, Raluca Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald Gainey, Mark Erbes, Thalia Gkika, Eleni Popp, Ilinca Spohn, Simon K. B. Krug, David Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Grosu, Anca-Ligia Sprave, Tanja |
author_facet | Stoian, Raluca Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald Gainey, Mark Erbes, Thalia Gkika, Eleni Popp, Ilinca Spohn, Simon K. B. Krug, David Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Grosu, Anca-Ligia Sprave, Tanja |
author_sort | Stoian, Raluca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no data from randomized trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost in women at high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the toxicity and oncological outcome of IORT or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with conventional external beam radiotherapy (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, patients were treated with a single dose of 20 Gy IORT with 50 kV photons, followed by WBI 50 Gy in 25 or 40.05 in 15 fractions or WBI 50 Gy with SIB up to 58.80–61.60 Gy in 25–28 fractions. Toxicity was compared after propensity score matching. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: A 1:1 propensity-score matching resulted in an IORT + WBI and SIB + WBI cohort of 60 patients, respectively. The median follow-up for IORT + WBI was 43.5 vs. 32 months in the SIB + WBI cohort. Most women had a pT1c tumor: IORT group 33 (55%) vs. 31 (51.7%) SIB group (p = 0.972). The luminal-B immunophenotype was most frequently diagnosed in the IORT group 43 (71.6%) vs. 35 (58.3%) in the SIB group (p = 0.283). The most reported acute adverse event in both groups was radiodermatitis. In the IORT cohort, radiodermatitis was grade 1: 23 (38.3%), grade 2: 26 (43.3%), and grade 3: 6 (10%) vs. SIB cohort grade 1: 3 (5.1%), grade 2: 21 (35%), and grade 3: 7 (11.6%) without a meaningful difference (p = 0.309). Fatigue occurred more frequently in the IORT group (grade 1: 21.7% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.041). In addition, intramammary lymphedema grade 1 occurred significantly more often in the IORT group (11.7% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.026). Both groups showed comparable late toxicity. The 3- and 5-year local control (LC) rates were each 98% in the SIB group vs. 98% and 93% in the IORT group (LS: log rank p = 0.717). CONCLUSION: Tumor bed boost using IORT and SIB techniques after BCS shows excellent local control and comparable late toxicity, while IORT application exhibits a moderate increase in acute toxicity. These data should be validated by the expected publication of the prospective randomized TARGIT-B study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10318399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103183992023-07-05 Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer Stoian, Raluca Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald Gainey, Mark Erbes, Thalia Gkika, Eleni Popp, Ilinca Spohn, Simon K. B. Krug, David Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Grosu, Anca-Ligia Sprave, Tanja Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no data from randomized trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost in women at high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the toxicity and oncological outcome of IORT or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with conventional external beam radiotherapy (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, patients were treated with a single dose of 20 Gy IORT with 50 kV photons, followed by WBI 50 Gy in 25 or 40.05 in 15 fractions or WBI 50 Gy with SIB up to 58.80–61.60 Gy in 25–28 fractions. Toxicity was compared after propensity score matching. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: A 1:1 propensity-score matching resulted in an IORT + WBI and SIB + WBI cohort of 60 patients, respectively. The median follow-up for IORT + WBI was 43.5 vs. 32 months in the SIB + WBI cohort. Most women had a pT1c tumor: IORT group 33 (55%) vs. 31 (51.7%) SIB group (p = 0.972). The luminal-B immunophenotype was most frequently diagnosed in the IORT group 43 (71.6%) vs. 35 (58.3%) in the SIB group (p = 0.283). The most reported acute adverse event in both groups was radiodermatitis. In the IORT cohort, radiodermatitis was grade 1: 23 (38.3%), grade 2: 26 (43.3%), and grade 3: 6 (10%) vs. SIB cohort grade 1: 3 (5.1%), grade 2: 21 (35%), and grade 3: 7 (11.6%) without a meaningful difference (p = 0.309). Fatigue occurred more frequently in the IORT group (grade 1: 21.7% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.041). In addition, intramammary lymphedema grade 1 occurred significantly more often in the IORT group (11.7% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.026). Both groups showed comparable late toxicity. The 3- and 5-year local control (LC) rates were each 98% in the SIB group vs. 98% and 93% in the IORT group (LS: log rank p = 0.717). CONCLUSION: Tumor bed boost using IORT and SIB techniques after BCS shows excellent local control and comparable late toxicity, while IORT application exhibits a moderate increase in acute toxicity. These data should be validated by the expected publication of the prospective randomized TARGIT-B study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10318399/ /pubmed/37409247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1210879 Text en Copyright © 2023 Stoian, Exner, Gainey, Erbes, Gkika, Popp, Spohn, Krug, Juhasz-Böss, Grosu and Sprave https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Stoian, Raluca Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald Gainey, Mark Erbes, Thalia Gkika, Eleni Popp, Ilinca Spohn, Simon K. B. Krug, David Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Grosu, Anca-Ligia Sprave, Tanja Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer |
title | Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer |
title_full | Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer |
title_short | Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer |
title_sort | comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1210879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoianraluca comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT exnerjanphilippharald comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT gaineymark comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT erbesthalia comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT gkikaeleni comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT poppilinca comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT spohnsimonkb comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT krugdavid comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT juhaszbossingolf comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT grosuancaligia comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer AT spravetanja comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer |