Cargando…

Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no data from randomized trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost in women at high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the toxicity and oncological outcome of IORT or simultaneous integrat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoian, Raluca, Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald, Gainey, Mark, Erbes, Thalia, Gkika, Eleni, Popp, Ilinca, Spohn, Simon K. B., Krug, David, Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf, Grosu, Anca-Ligia, Sprave, Tanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1210879
_version_ 1785068029102522368
author Stoian, Raluca
Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald
Gainey, Mark
Erbes, Thalia
Gkika, Eleni
Popp, Ilinca
Spohn, Simon K. B.
Krug, David
Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Sprave, Tanja
author_facet Stoian, Raluca
Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald
Gainey, Mark
Erbes, Thalia
Gkika, Eleni
Popp, Ilinca
Spohn, Simon K. B.
Krug, David
Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Sprave, Tanja
author_sort Stoian, Raluca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no data from randomized trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost in women at high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the toxicity and oncological outcome of IORT or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with conventional external beam radiotherapy (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, patients were treated with a single dose of 20 Gy IORT with 50 kV photons, followed by WBI 50 Gy in 25 or 40.05 in 15 fractions or WBI 50 Gy with SIB up to 58.80–61.60 Gy in 25–28 fractions. Toxicity was compared after propensity score matching. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: A 1:1 propensity-score matching resulted in an IORT + WBI and SIB + WBI cohort of 60 patients, respectively. The median follow-up for IORT + WBI was 43.5 vs. 32 months in the SIB + WBI cohort. Most women had a pT1c tumor: IORT group 33 (55%) vs. 31 (51.7%) SIB group (p = 0.972). The luminal-B immunophenotype was most frequently diagnosed in the IORT group 43 (71.6%) vs. 35 (58.3%) in the SIB group (p = 0.283). The most reported acute adverse event in both groups was radiodermatitis. In the IORT cohort, radiodermatitis was grade 1: 23 (38.3%), grade 2: 26 (43.3%), and grade 3: 6 (10%) vs. SIB cohort grade 1: 3 (5.1%), grade 2: 21 (35%), and grade 3: 7 (11.6%) without a meaningful difference (p = 0.309). Fatigue occurred more frequently in the IORT group (grade 1: 21.7% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.041). In addition, intramammary lymphedema grade 1 occurred significantly more often in the IORT group (11.7% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.026). Both groups showed comparable late toxicity. The 3- and 5-year local control (LC) rates were each 98% in the SIB group vs. 98% and 93% in the IORT group (LS: log rank p = 0.717). CONCLUSION: Tumor bed boost using IORT and SIB techniques after BCS shows excellent local control and comparable late toxicity, while IORT application exhibits a moderate increase in acute toxicity. These data should be validated by the expected publication of the prospective randomized TARGIT-B study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10318399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103183992023-07-05 Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer Stoian, Raluca Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald Gainey, Mark Erbes, Thalia Gkika, Eleni Popp, Ilinca Spohn, Simon K. B. Krug, David Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Grosu, Anca-Ligia Sprave, Tanja Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no data from randomized trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost in women at high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the toxicity and oncological outcome of IORT or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with conventional external beam radiotherapy (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, patients were treated with a single dose of 20 Gy IORT with 50 kV photons, followed by WBI 50 Gy in 25 or 40.05 in 15 fractions or WBI 50 Gy with SIB up to 58.80–61.60 Gy in 25–28 fractions. Toxicity was compared after propensity score matching. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: A 1:1 propensity-score matching resulted in an IORT + WBI and SIB + WBI cohort of 60 patients, respectively. The median follow-up for IORT + WBI was 43.5 vs. 32 months in the SIB + WBI cohort. Most women had a pT1c tumor: IORT group 33 (55%) vs. 31 (51.7%) SIB group (p = 0.972). The luminal-B immunophenotype was most frequently diagnosed in the IORT group 43 (71.6%) vs. 35 (58.3%) in the SIB group (p = 0.283). The most reported acute adverse event in both groups was radiodermatitis. In the IORT cohort, radiodermatitis was grade 1: 23 (38.3%), grade 2: 26 (43.3%), and grade 3: 6 (10%) vs. SIB cohort grade 1: 3 (5.1%), grade 2: 21 (35%), and grade 3: 7 (11.6%) without a meaningful difference (p = 0.309). Fatigue occurred more frequently in the IORT group (grade 1: 21.7% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.041). In addition, intramammary lymphedema grade 1 occurred significantly more often in the IORT group (11.7% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.026). Both groups showed comparable late toxicity. The 3- and 5-year local control (LC) rates were each 98% in the SIB group vs. 98% and 93% in the IORT group (LS: log rank p = 0.717). CONCLUSION: Tumor bed boost using IORT and SIB techniques after BCS shows excellent local control and comparable late toxicity, while IORT application exhibits a moderate increase in acute toxicity. These data should be validated by the expected publication of the prospective randomized TARGIT-B study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10318399/ /pubmed/37409247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1210879 Text en Copyright © 2023 Stoian, Exner, Gainey, Erbes, Gkika, Popp, Spohn, Krug, Juhasz-Böss, Grosu and Sprave https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Stoian, Raluca
Exner, Jan-Philipp Harald
Gainey, Mark
Erbes, Thalia
Gkika, Eleni
Popp, Ilinca
Spohn, Simon K. B.
Krug, David
Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Sprave, Tanja
Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
title Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
title_full Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
title_short Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
title_sort comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1210879
work_keys_str_mv AT stoianraluca comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT exnerjanphilippharald comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT gaineymark comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT erbesthalia comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT gkikaeleni comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT poppilinca comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT spohnsimonkb comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT krugdavid comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT juhaszbossingolf comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT grosuancaligia comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer
AT spravetanja comparisonofintraoperativeradiotherapyasaboostvssimultaneouslyintegratedboostsafterbreastconservingtherapyforbreastcancer