Cargando…

Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale

INTRODUCTION: The present work aims to discuss the current scenario of procedures and regulations regarding budget impact analysis/models (BIA/BIM) at regional level in Italy and to provide a standardized approach and detailed recommendations for developing these analyses. METHOD: A systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcellusi, Andrea, Ragonese, Angela, Marinozzi, Andrea, Bortolami, Alberto, Mucherino, Sara, Moreno, Carolina, Antenori, Amalia, Ferrario, Matteo, Simonelli, Claudia, Zanuzzi, Matteo, Cicoira, Marco, Lasala, Ruggero, Russoniello, Francesco, Attanasio, Francesco, Donati, Caterina, Roni, Chiara, Gemmi, Fabrizio, Mennini, Francesco Saverio, Russo, Pierluigi, Scroccaro, Giovanna, Canonico, Pier Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AboutScience 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408853
http://dx.doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2582
_version_ 1785068068104306688
author Marcellusi, Andrea
Ragonese, Angela
Marinozzi, Andrea
Bortolami, Alberto
Mucherino, Sara
Moreno, Carolina
Antenori, Amalia
Ferrario, Matteo
Simonelli, Claudia
Zanuzzi, Matteo
Cicoira, Marco
Lasala, Ruggero
Russoniello, Francesco
Attanasio, Francesco
Donati, Caterina
Roni, Chiara
Gemmi, Fabrizio
Mennini, Francesco Saverio
Russo, Pierluigi
Scroccaro, Giovanna
Canonico, Pier Luigi
author_facet Marcellusi, Andrea
Ragonese, Angela
Marinozzi, Andrea
Bortolami, Alberto
Mucherino, Sara
Moreno, Carolina
Antenori, Amalia
Ferrario, Matteo
Simonelli, Claudia
Zanuzzi, Matteo
Cicoira, Marco
Lasala, Ruggero
Russoniello, Francesco
Attanasio, Francesco
Donati, Caterina
Roni, Chiara
Gemmi, Fabrizio
Mennini, Francesco Saverio
Russo, Pierluigi
Scroccaro, Giovanna
Canonico, Pier Luigi
author_sort Marcellusi, Andrea
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The present work aims to discuss the current scenario of procedures and regulations regarding budget impact analysis/models (BIA/BIM) at regional level in Italy and to provide a standardized approach and detailed recommendations for developing these analyses. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to collect existing guidelines or specific regional procedures for budget impact analysis in Italy. All the records were analysed in qualitative terms according to a pre-specified analytical framework, based on the ISPOR BIA guidelines. At the end of the analysis, a consensus questionnaire was developed to establish agreed approaches and to provide possible solutions to any critical issues. A list of 39 statements was developed. The survey was distributed to 69 experts who rated their level of agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined as more than 66% of the panel agreeing/disagreeing with any given statement. RESULTS: Sisty-nine experts answered the questionnaire; a total of 30/39 statements achieved consensus. There was agreement on most of the statements. Time horizon to consider and costs were the issues on which no agreement was found. The results allowed the working group to define a list of good practices. CONCLUSION: While the structure and development of BIM are now well-known and well-applied at national level, there remains a great diversity of management of BIM tools at regional level. Consensus was reached among participating experts, as to the main characteristics, determinants and features of regional BIA/BIM in the perspective of the Italian payer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10318586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AboutScience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103185862023-07-05 Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale Marcellusi, Andrea Ragonese, Angela Marinozzi, Andrea Bortolami, Alberto Mucherino, Sara Moreno, Carolina Antenori, Amalia Ferrario, Matteo Simonelli, Claudia Zanuzzi, Matteo Cicoira, Marco Lasala, Ruggero Russoniello, Francesco Attanasio, Francesco Donati, Caterina Roni, Chiara Gemmi, Fabrizio Mennini, Francesco Saverio Russo, Pierluigi Scroccaro, Giovanna Canonico, Pier Luigi Glob Reg Health Technol Assess Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The present work aims to discuss the current scenario of procedures and regulations regarding budget impact analysis/models (BIA/BIM) at regional level in Italy and to provide a standardized approach and detailed recommendations for developing these analyses. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to collect existing guidelines or specific regional procedures for budget impact analysis in Italy. All the records were analysed in qualitative terms according to a pre-specified analytical framework, based on the ISPOR BIA guidelines. At the end of the analysis, a consensus questionnaire was developed to establish agreed approaches and to provide possible solutions to any critical issues. A list of 39 statements was developed. The survey was distributed to 69 experts who rated their level of agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined as more than 66% of the panel agreeing/disagreeing with any given statement. RESULTS: Sisty-nine experts answered the questionnaire; a total of 30/39 statements achieved consensus. There was agreement on most of the statements. Time horizon to consider and costs were the issues on which no agreement was found. The results allowed the working group to define a list of good practices. CONCLUSION: While the structure and development of BIM are now well-known and well-applied at national level, there remains a great diversity of management of BIM tools at regional level. Consensus was reached among participating experts, as to the main characteristics, determinants and features of regional BIA/BIM in the perspective of the Italian payer. AboutScience 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10318586/ /pubmed/37408853 http://dx.doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2582 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment - www.aboutscience.eu/grhta (http://www.aboutscience.eu/grhta) © 2023 The Authors. This article is published by AboutScience and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Commercial use is not permitted and is subject to Publisher’s permissions. Full information is available at www.aboutscience.eu (http://www.aboutscience.eu)
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Marcellusi, Andrea
Ragonese, Angela
Marinozzi, Andrea
Bortolami, Alberto
Mucherino, Sara
Moreno, Carolina
Antenori, Amalia
Ferrario, Matteo
Simonelli, Claudia
Zanuzzi, Matteo
Cicoira, Marco
Lasala, Ruggero
Russoniello, Francesco
Attanasio, Francesco
Donati, Caterina
Roni, Chiara
Gemmi, Fabrizio
Mennini, Francesco Saverio
Russo, Pierluigi
Scroccaro, Giovanna
Canonico, Pier Luigi
Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
title Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
title_full Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
title_fullStr Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
title_full_unstemmed Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
title_short Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
title_sort buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408853
http://dx.doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2582
work_keys_str_mv AT marcellusiandrea buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT ragoneseangela buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT marinozziandrea buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT bortolamialberto buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT mucherinosara buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT morenocarolina buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT antenoriamalia buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT ferrariomatteo buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT simonelliclaudia buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT zanuzzimatteo buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT cicoiramarco buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT lasalaruggero buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT russoniellofrancesco buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT attanasiofrancesco buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT donaticaterina buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT ronichiara buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT gemmifabrizio buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT menninifrancescosaverio buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT russopierluigi buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT scroccarogiovanna buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale
AT canonicopierluigi buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale