Cargando…
Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale
INTRODUCTION: The present work aims to discuss the current scenario of procedures and regulations regarding budget impact analysis/models (BIA/BIM) at regional level in Italy and to provide a standardized approach and detailed recommendations for developing these analyses. METHOD: A systematic revie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AboutScience
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408853 http://dx.doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2582 |
_version_ | 1785068068104306688 |
---|---|
author | Marcellusi, Andrea Ragonese, Angela Marinozzi, Andrea Bortolami, Alberto Mucherino, Sara Moreno, Carolina Antenori, Amalia Ferrario, Matteo Simonelli, Claudia Zanuzzi, Matteo Cicoira, Marco Lasala, Ruggero Russoniello, Francesco Attanasio, Francesco Donati, Caterina Roni, Chiara Gemmi, Fabrizio Mennini, Francesco Saverio Russo, Pierluigi Scroccaro, Giovanna Canonico, Pier Luigi |
author_facet | Marcellusi, Andrea Ragonese, Angela Marinozzi, Andrea Bortolami, Alberto Mucherino, Sara Moreno, Carolina Antenori, Amalia Ferrario, Matteo Simonelli, Claudia Zanuzzi, Matteo Cicoira, Marco Lasala, Ruggero Russoniello, Francesco Attanasio, Francesco Donati, Caterina Roni, Chiara Gemmi, Fabrizio Mennini, Francesco Saverio Russo, Pierluigi Scroccaro, Giovanna Canonico, Pier Luigi |
author_sort | Marcellusi, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The present work aims to discuss the current scenario of procedures and regulations regarding budget impact analysis/models (BIA/BIM) at regional level in Italy and to provide a standardized approach and detailed recommendations for developing these analyses. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to collect existing guidelines or specific regional procedures for budget impact analysis in Italy. All the records were analysed in qualitative terms according to a pre-specified analytical framework, based on the ISPOR BIA guidelines. At the end of the analysis, a consensus questionnaire was developed to establish agreed approaches and to provide possible solutions to any critical issues. A list of 39 statements was developed. The survey was distributed to 69 experts who rated their level of agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined as more than 66% of the panel agreeing/disagreeing with any given statement. RESULTS: Sisty-nine experts answered the questionnaire; a total of 30/39 statements achieved consensus. There was agreement on most of the statements. Time horizon to consider and costs were the issues on which no agreement was found. The results allowed the working group to define a list of good practices. CONCLUSION: While the structure and development of BIM are now well-known and well-applied at national level, there remains a great diversity of management of BIM tools at regional level. Consensus was reached among participating experts, as to the main characteristics, determinants and features of regional BIA/BIM in the perspective of the Italian payer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10318586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AboutScience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103185862023-07-05 Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale Marcellusi, Andrea Ragonese, Angela Marinozzi, Andrea Bortolami, Alberto Mucherino, Sara Moreno, Carolina Antenori, Amalia Ferrario, Matteo Simonelli, Claudia Zanuzzi, Matteo Cicoira, Marco Lasala, Ruggero Russoniello, Francesco Attanasio, Francesco Donati, Caterina Roni, Chiara Gemmi, Fabrizio Mennini, Francesco Saverio Russo, Pierluigi Scroccaro, Giovanna Canonico, Pier Luigi Glob Reg Health Technol Assess Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The present work aims to discuss the current scenario of procedures and regulations regarding budget impact analysis/models (BIA/BIM) at regional level in Italy and to provide a standardized approach and detailed recommendations for developing these analyses. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to collect existing guidelines or specific regional procedures for budget impact analysis in Italy. All the records were analysed in qualitative terms according to a pre-specified analytical framework, based on the ISPOR BIA guidelines. At the end of the analysis, a consensus questionnaire was developed to establish agreed approaches and to provide possible solutions to any critical issues. A list of 39 statements was developed. The survey was distributed to 69 experts who rated their level of agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined as more than 66% of the panel agreeing/disagreeing with any given statement. RESULTS: Sisty-nine experts answered the questionnaire; a total of 30/39 statements achieved consensus. There was agreement on most of the statements. Time horizon to consider and costs were the issues on which no agreement was found. The results allowed the working group to define a list of good practices. CONCLUSION: While the structure and development of BIM are now well-known and well-applied at national level, there remains a great diversity of management of BIM tools at regional level. Consensus was reached among participating experts, as to the main characteristics, determinants and features of regional BIA/BIM in the perspective of the Italian payer. AboutScience 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10318586/ /pubmed/37408853 http://dx.doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2582 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment - www.aboutscience.eu/grhta (http://www.aboutscience.eu/grhta) © 2023 The Authors. This article is published by AboutScience and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Commercial use is not permitted and is subject to Publisher’s permissions. Full information is available at www.aboutscience.eu (http://www.aboutscience.eu) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Marcellusi, Andrea Ragonese, Angela Marinozzi, Andrea Bortolami, Alberto Mucherino, Sara Moreno, Carolina Antenori, Amalia Ferrario, Matteo Simonelli, Claudia Zanuzzi, Matteo Cicoira, Marco Lasala, Ruggero Russoniello, Francesco Attanasio, Francesco Donati, Caterina Roni, Chiara Gemmi, Fabrizio Mennini, Francesco Saverio Russo, Pierluigi Scroccaro, Giovanna Canonico, Pier Luigi Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale |
title | Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale |
title_full | Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale |
title_fullStr | Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale |
title_full_unstemmed | Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale |
title_short | Buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale |
title_sort | buone pratiche per lo sviluppo dei modelli di budget impact a livello regionale |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408853 http://dx.doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2023.2582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcellusiandrea buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT ragoneseangela buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT marinozziandrea buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT bortolamialberto buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT mucherinosara buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT morenocarolina buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT antenoriamalia buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT ferrariomatteo buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT simonelliclaudia buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT zanuzzimatteo buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT cicoiramarco buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT lasalaruggero buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT russoniellofrancesco buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT attanasiofrancesco buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT donaticaterina buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT ronichiara buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT gemmifabrizio buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT menninifrancescosaverio buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT russopierluigi buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT scroccarogiovanna buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale AT canonicopierluigi buonepraticheperlosviluppodeimodellidibudgetimpactalivelloregionale |