Cargando…
Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: a cross-sectional study (part 1)
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews that assess the benefits of interventions often do not completely capture all dimensions of the adverse effects. This cross-sectional study (part 1 of 2 studies) assessed whether adverse effects were sought, whether the findings on these effects were reported, and what...
Autores principales: | Steegmans, Pauline A. J., Di Girolamo, Nicola, Bipat, Shandra, Reynders, Reint A. Meursinge |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37400925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02273-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study
por: Steegmans, Pauline A. J., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Spin on adverse effects in abstracts of systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: a cross-sectional study (part 2)
por: Steegmans, Pauline A. J., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews
por: Steegmans, Pauline A. J., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals
por: Di Girolamo, Nicola, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey
por: Meursinge Reynders, Reint, et al.
Publicado: (2017)