Cargando…
Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study
BACKGROUND: In Ireland, the agriculture sector reports the highest number of fatalities even though farmers constitute only 6% of the working population. Tractor-related behaviours are implicated in 55% of all vehicle work-related fatalities and 25% of reported injuries, and many of these occur in f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01319-w |
_version_ | 1785068097920565248 |
---|---|
author | Surendran, Aswathi McSharry, Jenny Meredith, David McNamara, John Bligh, Francis Meade, Oonagh O’Hora, Denis |
author_facet | Surendran, Aswathi McSharry, Jenny Meredith, David McNamara, John Bligh, Francis Meade, Oonagh O’Hora, Denis |
author_sort | Surendran, Aswathi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Ireland, the agriculture sector reports the highest number of fatalities even though farmers constitute only 6% of the working population. Tractor-related behaviours are implicated in 55% of all vehicle work-related fatalities and 25% of reported injuries, and many of these occur in farmyards. There is limited research on the feasibility and acceptability of behaviour change interventions to improve tractor safety. Target behaviours that promote safe operation in farmyards, determining and addressing blind spots of tractors, were identified, and an intervention was developed following the Behaviour Change Wheel Approach. The objective of the study is to examine the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to enhance the safe operation of tractors in farmyards with a particular focus on tractor blind spots. METHOD: A single group feasibility study will be undertaken. Approximately 16 farmers from four major farm types will be recruited for the study between August and September 2022. The intervention involves an in-person demo session, facilitated discussion and personalised safety training procedure with safety goals. The study will collect data from participants at three time points: baseline (3–10 days prior to the intervention), during the intervention and at the follow-up session (7–30 days post-intervention). Quantitative data will be collected through a pre-intervention interview and feedback surveys. A pre- and post-intervention qualitative interview will also be conducted with the participants and will be supplemented with qualitative data from recruitment logs, observational memos and logs and feedback from recruiters. Evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of the intervention will be guided by a pre-determined feasibility checklist, fidelity framework and theoretical framework of acceptability, respectively. Interviews will be analysed using the content analysis. DISCUSSION: The current study can determine the feasibility and fidelity of delivering a systematic, theoretically driven, tailored behaviour change intervention. It will also assess whether the intervention, its ingredients and delivery are acceptable to the farming population. This study will also inform the development of a future larger trial to test the effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN22219089. Date applied 29 July 2022 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01319-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10318716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103187162023-07-05 Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study Surendran, Aswathi McSharry, Jenny Meredith, David McNamara, John Bligh, Francis Meade, Oonagh O’Hora, Denis Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In Ireland, the agriculture sector reports the highest number of fatalities even though farmers constitute only 6% of the working population. Tractor-related behaviours are implicated in 55% of all vehicle work-related fatalities and 25% of reported injuries, and many of these occur in farmyards. There is limited research on the feasibility and acceptability of behaviour change interventions to improve tractor safety. Target behaviours that promote safe operation in farmyards, determining and addressing blind spots of tractors, were identified, and an intervention was developed following the Behaviour Change Wheel Approach. The objective of the study is to examine the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to enhance the safe operation of tractors in farmyards with a particular focus on tractor blind spots. METHOD: A single group feasibility study will be undertaken. Approximately 16 farmers from four major farm types will be recruited for the study between August and September 2022. The intervention involves an in-person demo session, facilitated discussion and personalised safety training procedure with safety goals. The study will collect data from participants at three time points: baseline (3–10 days prior to the intervention), during the intervention and at the follow-up session (7–30 days post-intervention). Quantitative data will be collected through a pre-intervention interview and feedback surveys. A pre- and post-intervention qualitative interview will also be conducted with the participants and will be supplemented with qualitative data from recruitment logs, observational memos and logs and feedback from recruiters. Evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of the intervention will be guided by a pre-determined feasibility checklist, fidelity framework and theoretical framework of acceptability, respectively. Interviews will be analysed using the content analysis. DISCUSSION: The current study can determine the feasibility and fidelity of delivering a systematic, theoretically driven, tailored behaviour change intervention. It will also assess whether the intervention, its ingredients and delivery are acceptable to the farming population. This study will also inform the development of a future larger trial to test the effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN22219089. Date applied 29 July 2022 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01319-w. BioMed Central 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10318716/ /pubmed/37403177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01319-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Surendran, Aswathi McSharry, Jenny Meredith, David McNamara, John Bligh, Francis Meade, Oonagh O’Hora, Denis Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study |
title | Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study |
title_full | Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study |
title_short | Assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the BeSafe tractor safety feasibility study |
title_sort | assessing the feasibility, fidelity and acceptability of a behaviour change intervention to improve tractor safety on farms: protocol for the besafe tractor safety feasibility study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01319-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT surendranaswathi assessingthefeasibilityfidelityandacceptabilityofabehaviourchangeinterventiontoimprovetractorsafetyonfarmsprotocolforthebesafetractorsafetyfeasibilitystudy AT mcsharryjenny assessingthefeasibilityfidelityandacceptabilityofabehaviourchangeinterventiontoimprovetractorsafetyonfarmsprotocolforthebesafetractorsafetyfeasibilitystudy AT meredithdavid assessingthefeasibilityfidelityandacceptabilityofabehaviourchangeinterventiontoimprovetractorsafetyonfarmsprotocolforthebesafetractorsafetyfeasibilitystudy AT mcnamarajohn assessingthefeasibilityfidelityandacceptabilityofabehaviourchangeinterventiontoimprovetractorsafetyonfarmsprotocolforthebesafetractorsafetyfeasibilitystudy AT blighfrancis assessingthefeasibilityfidelityandacceptabilityofabehaviourchangeinterventiontoimprovetractorsafetyonfarmsprotocolforthebesafetractorsafetyfeasibilitystudy AT meadeoonagh assessingthefeasibilityfidelityandacceptabilityofabehaviourchangeinterventiontoimprovetractorsafetyonfarmsprotocolforthebesafetractorsafetyfeasibilitystudy AT ohoradenis assessingthefeasibilityfidelityandacceptabilityofabehaviourchangeinterventiontoimprovetractorsafetyonfarmsprotocolforthebesafetractorsafetyfeasibilitystudy |