Cargando…

Burnout Among Chinese Anesthesiologists After the COVID-19 Pandemic Peak: A National Survey

Evidence has shown that large-scale pandemics can have prolonged psychological impacts on health care professionals. The current study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of burnout after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic peak and to explore the prolonged impact of COVID-19 on burnout am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Che, Lu, Ma, Shuang, Zhang, Yue Lun, Huang, Yuguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
53
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36729947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006298
Descripción
Sumario:Evidence has shown that large-scale pandemics can have prolonged psychological impacts on health care professionals. The current study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of burnout after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic peak and to explore the prolonged impact of COVID-19 on burnout among Chinese anesthesiologists. METHODS: From August 2021 to October 2021, a nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey. Basic demographic information, exposure to COVID-19, and perceived institutional support were documented. Validated tools measuring mental health status, including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and resilience, were also used to provide additional information on psychological distress. RESULTS: Of the 8850 anesthesiologists from the 218 institutions who were invited to participate, 6331 (74.93%) completed the surveys and were included in the analysis. A total of 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.5–53.9) met the criteria for burnout. Depression, anxiety, and PTSD were positively associated with burnout. After pooled multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounding factors, among the COVID-19 exposure parameters, redeployment outside normal professional boundaries remained associated with an increased risk of burnout (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72–0.92; P = .039). Higher perceived institutional support and resilience could act as protective factors against burnout. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the psychological well-being of anesthesiologists still exists more than 1 year after the outbreak. Building better institutional support and cultivating stronger resilience may be helpful future intervention measures.