Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis
PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to compare the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression (UBE) and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) in the treatment of elderly patients with single-level lumbar lateral recess stenosis (LRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409162 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S413502 |
_version_ | 1785068217311428608 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Xiaokang Wu, Yuxuan Chen, Bin Tang, Jiagang |
author_facet | Cheng, Xiaokang Wu, Yuxuan Chen, Bin Tang, Jiagang |
author_sort | Cheng, Xiaokang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to compare the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression (UBE) and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) in the treatment of elderly patients with single-level lumbar lateral recess stenosis (LRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from January 2020 to March 2022 were analyzed. Thirty-eight patients in the PTED group and thirty-nine patients in the UBE group completed the minimum 12-month follow-up. The demographic data and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the VAS for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. RESULTS: Both groups of patients completed surgery and a one-year follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups in demographics data. UBE has the advantage in operative duration and X-ray time; as far as incision length, blood loss, and drainage volume are concerned, PTED is advantageous. Under the modified MacNab criteria, UBE exhibited a good-to-excellent rate similar to that of PTED (84.6% vs 81.6%, P>0.05). There were no significant differences at any point in time between UBE and PTED with respect to ODI, VAS, or back pain scores (P>0.05). UBE and PTED did not differ significantly in terms of complications. CONCLUSION: Both PTED and UBE achieved favorable outcomes in single-level LRS. For operative time and X-ray times, UBE is more advantageous, while PTED offers better estimates of blood loss, incision length, and drainage volume. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10319288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103192882023-07-05 A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis Cheng, Xiaokang Wu, Yuxuan Chen, Bin Tang, Jiagang J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to compare the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression (UBE) and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) in the treatment of elderly patients with single-level lumbar lateral recess stenosis (LRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from January 2020 to March 2022 were analyzed. Thirty-eight patients in the PTED group and thirty-nine patients in the UBE group completed the minimum 12-month follow-up. The demographic data and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the VAS for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. RESULTS: Both groups of patients completed surgery and a one-year follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups in demographics data. UBE has the advantage in operative duration and X-ray time; as far as incision length, blood loss, and drainage volume are concerned, PTED is advantageous. Under the modified MacNab criteria, UBE exhibited a good-to-excellent rate similar to that of PTED (84.6% vs 81.6%, P>0.05). There were no significant differences at any point in time between UBE and PTED with respect to ODI, VAS, or back pain scores (P>0.05). UBE and PTED did not differ significantly in terms of complications. CONCLUSION: Both PTED and UBE achieved favorable outcomes in single-level LRS. For operative time and X-ray times, UBE is more advantageous, while PTED offers better estimates of blood loss, incision length, and drainage volume. Dove 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10319288/ /pubmed/37409162 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S413502 Text en © 2023 Cheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cheng, Xiaokang Wu, Yuxuan Chen, Bin Tang, Jiagang A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis |
title | A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis |
title_sort | comparative study of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for geriatric patients with lumbar lateral recess stenosis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409162 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S413502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengxiaokang acomparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis AT wuyuxuan acomparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis AT chenbin acomparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis AT tangjiagang acomparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis AT chengxiaokang comparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis AT wuyuxuan comparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis AT chenbin comparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis AT tangjiagang comparativestudyofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionandpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionforgeriatricpatientswithlumbarlateralrecessstenosis |