Cargando…

Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Although cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is common, lymph node metastases are relatively rare and are usually treated with lymph node dissection (LND). The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course and prognosis after LND for cSCC at all anatomical locations. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A., Boere, Thomas, Zuur, Charlotte L., Wouters, Michel W., van Akkooi, Alexander C. J., Haanen, John B. A. G., Crijns, Marianne B., Smith, Myles J., Mooyaart, Antien, Wakkee, Marlies, Sewnaik, Aniel, Strauss, Dirk C., Grunhagen, Dirk J., Verhoef, Cornelis, Hayes, Andrew J., van Houdt, Winan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13306-9
_version_ 1785068286770151424
author Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A.
Boere, Thomas
Zuur, Charlotte L.
Wouters, Michel W.
van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.
Haanen, John B. A. G.
Crijns, Marianne B.
Smith, Myles J.
Mooyaart, Antien
Wakkee, Marlies
Sewnaik, Aniel
Strauss, Dirk C.
Grunhagen, Dirk J.
Verhoef, Cornelis
Hayes, Andrew J.
van Houdt, Winan J.
author_facet Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A.
Boere, Thomas
Zuur, Charlotte L.
Wouters, Michel W.
van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.
Haanen, John B. A. G.
Crijns, Marianne B.
Smith, Myles J.
Mooyaart, Antien
Wakkee, Marlies
Sewnaik, Aniel
Strauss, Dirk C.
Grunhagen, Dirk J.
Verhoef, Cornelis
Hayes, Andrew J.
van Houdt, Winan J.
author_sort Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is common, lymph node metastases are relatively rare and are usually treated with lymph node dissection (LND). The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course and prognosis after LND for cSCC at all anatomical locations. METHODS: A retrospective search at three centres was performed to identify patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC who were treated with LND. Prognostic factors were identified by uni- and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were identified with a median age of 74. All lymph node metastases were treated with LND, and 65% of the patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. After LND, 35% developed recurrent disease both locoregionally and distantly. Patients with more than one positive lymph node had an increased risk for recurrent disease. 165 (62%) patients died during follow-up of whom 77 (29%) due to cSCC. The 5-year OS- and DSS rate were 36% and 52%, respectively. Disease-specific survival was significantly worse in immunosuppressed patients, patients with primary tumors >2cm and patients with more than one positive lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that LND for patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC leads to a 5-year DSS of 52%. After LND, approximately one-third of the patients develop recurrent disease (locoregional and/or distant), which underscores the need for better systemic treatment options for locally advanced cSCC. The size of the primary tumor, more than one positive lymph node, and immunosuppression are independent predictors for risk of recurrence and disease-specific survival after LND for cSCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10319664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103196642023-07-06 Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A. Boere, Thomas Zuur, Charlotte L. Wouters, Michel W. van Akkooi, Alexander C. J. Haanen, John B. A. G. Crijns, Marianne B. Smith, Myles J. Mooyaart, Antien Wakkee, Marlies Sewnaik, Aniel Strauss, Dirk C. Grunhagen, Dirk J. Verhoef, Cornelis Hayes, Andrew J. van Houdt, Winan J. Ann Surg Oncol Melanoma BACKGROUND: Although cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is common, lymph node metastases are relatively rare and are usually treated with lymph node dissection (LND). The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course and prognosis after LND for cSCC at all anatomical locations. METHODS: A retrospective search at three centres was performed to identify patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC who were treated with LND. Prognostic factors were identified by uni- and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were identified with a median age of 74. All lymph node metastases were treated with LND, and 65% of the patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. After LND, 35% developed recurrent disease both locoregionally and distantly. Patients with more than one positive lymph node had an increased risk for recurrent disease. 165 (62%) patients died during follow-up of whom 77 (29%) due to cSCC. The 5-year OS- and DSS rate were 36% and 52%, respectively. Disease-specific survival was significantly worse in immunosuppressed patients, patients with primary tumors >2cm and patients with more than one positive lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that LND for patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC leads to a 5-year DSS of 52%. After LND, approximately one-third of the patients develop recurrent disease (locoregional and/or distant), which underscores the need for better systemic treatment options for locally advanced cSCC. The size of the primary tumor, more than one positive lymph node, and immunosuppression are independent predictors for risk of recurrence and disease-specific survival after LND for cSCC. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10319664/ /pubmed/36991168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13306-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Melanoma
Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A.
Boere, Thomas
Zuur, Charlotte L.
Wouters, Michel W.
van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.
Haanen, John B. A. G.
Crijns, Marianne B.
Smith, Myles J.
Mooyaart, Antien
Wakkee, Marlies
Sewnaik, Aniel
Strauss, Dirk C.
Grunhagen, Dirk J.
Verhoef, Cornelis
Hayes, Andrew J.
van Houdt, Winan J.
Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_short Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_sort oncological outcome after lymph node dissection for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
topic Melanoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13306-9
work_keys_str_mv AT huisintveldevaa oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT boerethomas oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zuurcharlottel oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT woutersmichelw oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT vanakkooialexandercj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT haanenjohnbag oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT crijnsmarianneb oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT smithmylesj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT mooyaartantien oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wakkeemarlies oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT sewnaikaniel oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT straussdirkc oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT grunhagendirkj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT verhoefcornelis oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT hayesandrewj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT vanhoudtwinanj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma