Cargando…
Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Although cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is common, lymph node metastases are relatively rare and are usually treated with lymph node dissection (LND). The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course and prognosis after LND for cSCC at all anatomical locations. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13306-9 |
_version_ | 1785068286770151424 |
---|---|
author | Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A. Boere, Thomas Zuur, Charlotte L. Wouters, Michel W. van Akkooi, Alexander C. J. Haanen, John B. A. G. Crijns, Marianne B. Smith, Myles J. Mooyaart, Antien Wakkee, Marlies Sewnaik, Aniel Strauss, Dirk C. Grunhagen, Dirk J. Verhoef, Cornelis Hayes, Andrew J. van Houdt, Winan J. |
author_facet | Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A. Boere, Thomas Zuur, Charlotte L. Wouters, Michel W. van Akkooi, Alexander C. J. Haanen, John B. A. G. Crijns, Marianne B. Smith, Myles J. Mooyaart, Antien Wakkee, Marlies Sewnaik, Aniel Strauss, Dirk C. Grunhagen, Dirk J. Verhoef, Cornelis Hayes, Andrew J. van Houdt, Winan J. |
author_sort | Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is common, lymph node metastases are relatively rare and are usually treated with lymph node dissection (LND). The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course and prognosis after LND for cSCC at all anatomical locations. METHODS: A retrospective search at three centres was performed to identify patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC who were treated with LND. Prognostic factors were identified by uni- and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were identified with a median age of 74. All lymph node metastases were treated with LND, and 65% of the patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. After LND, 35% developed recurrent disease both locoregionally and distantly. Patients with more than one positive lymph node had an increased risk for recurrent disease. 165 (62%) patients died during follow-up of whom 77 (29%) due to cSCC. The 5-year OS- and DSS rate were 36% and 52%, respectively. Disease-specific survival was significantly worse in immunosuppressed patients, patients with primary tumors >2cm and patients with more than one positive lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that LND for patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC leads to a 5-year DSS of 52%. After LND, approximately one-third of the patients develop recurrent disease (locoregional and/or distant), which underscores the need for better systemic treatment options for locally advanced cSCC. The size of the primary tumor, more than one positive lymph node, and immunosuppression are independent predictors for risk of recurrence and disease-specific survival after LND for cSCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10319664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103196642023-07-06 Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A. Boere, Thomas Zuur, Charlotte L. Wouters, Michel W. van Akkooi, Alexander C. J. Haanen, John B. A. G. Crijns, Marianne B. Smith, Myles J. Mooyaart, Antien Wakkee, Marlies Sewnaik, Aniel Strauss, Dirk C. Grunhagen, Dirk J. Verhoef, Cornelis Hayes, Andrew J. van Houdt, Winan J. Ann Surg Oncol Melanoma BACKGROUND: Although cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is common, lymph node metastases are relatively rare and are usually treated with lymph node dissection (LND). The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course and prognosis after LND for cSCC at all anatomical locations. METHODS: A retrospective search at three centres was performed to identify patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC who were treated with LND. Prognostic factors were identified by uni- and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were identified with a median age of 74. All lymph node metastases were treated with LND, and 65% of the patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. After LND, 35% developed recurrent disease both locoregionally and distantly. Patients with more than one positive lymph node had an increased risk for recurrent disease. 165 (62%) patients died during follow-up of whom 77 (29%) due to cSCC. The 5-year OS- and DSS rate were 36% and 52%, respectively. Disease-specific survival was significantly worse in immunosuppressed patients, patients with primary tumors >2cm and patients with more than one positive lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that LND for patients with lymph node metastases of cSCC leads to a 5-year DSS of 52%. After LND, approximately one-third of the patients develop recurrent disease (locoregional and/or distant), which underscores the need for better systemic treatment options for locally advanced cSCC. The size of the primary tumor, more than one positive lymph node, and immunosuppression are independent predictors for risk of recurrence and disease-specific survival after LND for cSCC. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10319664/ /pubmed/36991168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13306-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Melanoma Huis in ’t Veld, Eva A. Boere, Thomas Zuur, Charlotte L. Wouters, Michel W. van Akkooi, Alexander C. J. Haanen, John B. A. G. Crijns, Marianne B. Smith, Myles J. Mooyaart, Antien Wakkee, Marlies Sewnaik, Aniel Strauss, Dirk C. Grunhagen, Dirk J. Verhoef, Cornelis Hayes, Andrew J. van Houdt, Winan J. Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title | Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full | Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_short | Oncological Outcome After Lymph Node Dissection for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_sort | oncological outcome after lymph node dissection for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Melanoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13306-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huisintveldevaa oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT boerethomas oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT zuurcharlottel oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT woutersmichelw oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT vanakkooialexandercj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT haanenjohnbag oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT crijnsmarianneb oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT smithmylesj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT mooyaartantien oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT wakkeemarlies oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT sewnaikaniel oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT straussdirkc oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT grunhagendirkj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT verhoefcornelis oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT hayesandrewj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma AT vanhoudtwinanj oncologicaloutcomeafterlymphnodedissectionforcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma |