Cargando…

Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?

BACKGROUND: Surgical mortality indicators should be risk-adjusted when evaluating the performance of organisations. This study evaluated the performance of risk-adjustment models that used English hospital administrative data for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wahba, Adam J, Phillips, Nick, Mathew, Ryan K, Hutchinson, Peter J, Helmy, Adel, Cromwell, David A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05623-5
_version_ 1785068294652297216
author Wahba, Adam J
Phillips, Nick
Mathew, Ryan K
Hutchinson, Peter J
Helmy, Adel
Cromwell, David A
author_facet Wahba, Adam J
Phillips, Nick
Mathew, Ryan K
Hutchinson, Peter J
Helmy, Adel
Cromwell, David A
author_sort Wahba, Adam J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical mortality indicators should be risk-adjusted when evaluating the performance of organisations. This study evaluated the performance of risk-adjustment models that used English hospital administrative data for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2018. Organisational-level 30-day mortality was calculated for selected subspecialties (neuro-oncology, neurovascular and trauma neurosurgery) and the overall cohort. Risk adjustment models were developed using multivariable logistic regression and incorporated various patient variables: age, sex, admission method, social deprivation, comorbidity and frailty indices. Performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: The cohort included 49,044 patients. Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 4.9%, with unadjusted organisational rates ranging from 3.2 to 9.3%. The variables in the best performing models varied for the subspecialties; for trauma neurosurgery, a model that included deprivation and frailty had the best calibration, while for neuro-oncology a model with these variables plus comorbidity performed best. For neurovascular surgery, a simple model of age, sex and admission method performed best. Levels of discrimination varied for the subspecialties (range: 0.583 for trauma and 0.740 for neurovascular). The models were generally well calibrated. Application of the models to the organisation figures produced an average (median) absolute change in mortality of 0.33% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.15–0.72) for the overall cohort model. Median changes for the subspecialty models were 0.29% (neuro-oncology, IQR 0.15–0.42), 0.40% (neurovascular, IQR 0.24–0.78) and 0.49% (trauma neurosurgery, IQR 0.23–1.68). CONCLUSIONS: Reasonable risk-adjustment models for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery procedures were possible using variables from HES, although the models for trauma neurosurgery performed less well. Including a measure of frailty often improved model performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05623-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10319696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103196962023-07-06 Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment? Wahba, Adam J Phillips, Nick Mathew, Ryan K Hutchinson, Peter J Helmy, Adel Cromwell, David A Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article BACKGROUND: Surgical mortality indicators should be risk-adjusted when evaluating the performance of organisations. This study evaluated the performance of risk-adjustment models that used English hospital administrative data for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2018. Organisational-level 30-day mortality was calculated for selected subspecialties (neuro-oncology, neurovascular and trauma neurosurgery) and the overall cohort. Risk adjustment models were developed using multivariable logistic regression and incorporated various patient variables: age, sex, admission method, social deprivation, comorbidity and frailty indices. Performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: The cohort included 49,044 patients. Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 4.9%, with unadjusted organisational rates ranging from 3.2 to 9.3%. The variables in the best performing models varied for the subspecialties; for trauma neurosurgery, a model that included deprivation and frailty had the best calibration, while for neuro-oncology a model with these variables plus comorbidity performed best. For neurovascular surgery, a simple model of age, sex and admission method performed best. Levels of discrimination varied for the subspecialties (range: 0.583 for trauma and 0.740 for neurovascular). The models were generally well calibrated. Application of the models to the organisation figures produced an average (median) absolute change in mortality of 0.33% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.15–0.72) for the overall cohort model. Median changes for the subspecialty models were 0.29% (neuro-oncology, IQR 0.15–0.42), 0.40% (neurovascular, IQR 0.24–0.78) and 0.49% (trauma neurosurgery, IQR 0.23–1.68). CONCLUSIONS: Reasonable risk-adjustment models for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery procedures were possible using variables from HES, although the models for trauma neurosurgery performed less well. Including a measure of frailty often improved model performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05623-5. Springer Vienna 2023-05-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10319696/ /pubmed/37243824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05623-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wahba, Adam J
Phillips, Nick
Mathew, Ryan K
Hutchinson, Peter J
Helmy, Adel
Cromwell, David A
Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
title Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
title_full Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
title_fullStr Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
title_short Benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
title_sort benchmarking short-term postoperative mortality across neurosurgery units: is hospital administrative data good enough for risk-adjustment?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05623-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wahbaadamj benchmarkingshorttermpostoperativemortalityacrossneurosurgeryunitsishospitaladministrativedatagoodenoughforriskadjustment
AT phillipsnick benchmarkingshorttermpostoperativemortalityacrossneurosurgeryunitsishospitaladministrativedatagoodenoughforriskadjustment
AT mathewryank benchmarkingshorttermpostoperativemortalityacrossneurosurgeryunitsishospitaladministrativedatagoodenoughforriskadjustment
AT hutchinsonpeterj benchmarkingshorttermpostoperativemortalityacrossneurosurgeryunitsishospitaladministrativedatagoodenoughforriskadjustment
AT helmyadel benchmarkingshorttermpostoperativemortalityacrossneurosurgeryunitsishospitaladministrativedatagoodenoughforriskadjustment
AT cromwelldavida benchmarkingshorttermpostoperativemortalityacrossneurosurgeryunitsishospitaladministrativedatagoodenoughforriskadjustment