Cargando…
Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
BACKGROUND: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accura...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587 |
_version_ | 1785068346294665216 |
---|---|
author | de Man, Leoni Wentzel, Mari van Rooyen, Cornel Turton, Edwin |
author_facet | de Man, Leoni Wentzel, Mari van Rooyen, Cornel Turton, Edwin |
author_sort | de Man, Leoni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a ‘bubble test’ to detect malposition and pneumothorax. METHOD: Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the ‘bubble test’ and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR. RESULTS: Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18–56 min) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition. CONTRIBUTION: Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10319935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103199352023-07-06 Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position de Man, Leoni Wentzel, Mari van Rooyen, Cornel Turton, Edwin SA J Radiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a ‘bubble test’ to detect malposition and pneumothorax. METHOD: Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the ‘bubble test’ and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR. RESULTS: Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18–56 min) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition. CONTRIBUTION: Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition. AOSIS 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10319935/ /pubmed/37416693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587 Text en © 2023. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research de Man, Leoni Wentzel, Mari van Rooyen, Cornel Turton, Edwin Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position |
title | Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position |
title_full | Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position |
title_fullStr | Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position |
title_short | Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position |
title_sort | comparison between ultrasound and chest x-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demanleoni comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition AT wentzelmari comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition AT vanrooyencornel comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition AT turtonedwin comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition |