Cargando…

Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position

BACKGROUND: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Man, Leoni, Wentzel, Mari, van Rooyen, Cornel, Turton, Edwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416693
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587
_version_ 1785068346294665216
author de Man, Leoni
Wentzel, Mari
van Rooyen, Cornel
Turton, Edwin
author_facet de Man, Leoni
Wentzel, Mari
van Rooyen, Cornel
Turton, Edwin
author_sort de Man, Leoni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a ‘bubble test’ to detect malposition and pneumothorax. METHOD: Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the ‘bubble test’ and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR. RESULTS: Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18–56 min) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition. CONTRIBUTION: Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10319935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103199352023-07-06 Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position de Man, Leoni Wentzel, Mari van Rooyen, Cornel Turton, Edwin SA J Radiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a ‘bubble test’ to detect malposition and pneumothorax. METHOD: Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the ‘bubble test’ and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR. RESULTS: Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18–56 min) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition. CONTRIBUTION: Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition. AOSIS 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10319935/ /pubmed/37416693 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587 Text en © 2023. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Man, Leoni
Wentzel, Mari
van Rooyen, Cornel
Turton, Edwin
Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
title Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
title_full Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
title_fullStr Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
title_short Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
title_sort comparison between ultrasound and chest x-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416693
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587
work_keys_str_mv AT demanleoni comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition
AT wentzelmari comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition
AT vanrooyencornel comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition
AT turtonedwin comparisonbetweenultrasoundandchestxraytoconfirmcentralvenouscathetertipposition