Cargando…

Performance evaluation of the UMIC(®) Cefiderocol to determine MIC in Gram-negative bacteria

BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is a catechol-substituted cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Cefiderocol susceptibility testing is complex because iron concentrations need to be taken into consideration. Here, we assessed the clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dortet, Laurent, Niccolai, Claudia, Pfennigwerth, Niels, Frisch, Stefanie, Gonzalez, Camille, Antonelli, Alberto, Giani, Tommaso, Hoenings, Robert, Gatermann, Soeren, Rossolini, Gian Maria, Naas, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37209112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad149
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is a catechol-substituted cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Cefiderocol susceptibility testing is complex because iron concentrations need to be taken into consideration. Here, we assessed the clinical performance of Bruker’s UMIC(®) Cefiderocol and corresponding iron-depleted CAMHB to determine MIC by broth microdilution (BMD) for clinically relevant GNB. METHODS: MICs of cefiderocol for 283 GN clinical isolates were determined by BMD using iron-depleted CAMHB. Frozen panels were used as a reference. The concentration range of cefiderocol was 0.03–32 mg/L. The isolates, with different degrees of susceptibility to cefiderocol, included Enterobacterales (n = 180), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 49), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 44) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 10). RESULTS: The rates of categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA) and bias were calculated to evaluate the performance of the UMIC(®) Cefiderocol, as compared with the reference method. Overall, the UMIC(®) Cefiderocol showed 90.8% EA (95% CI: 86.9%–93.7%) with a bias of −14.5% and a CA of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.1%–93.1%). For Enterobacterales, the UMIC(®) Cefiderocol showed 91.7% EA (95% CI: 86.7%–94.9%) with a bias of −25.0% and a CA of 87.8% (95% CI: 82.2%–91.8%). For non-fermenters, the UMIC(®) Cefiderocol showed 89.3% EA (95% CI: 81.9%–93.9%) (not significantly different from 90.0%, Student t-test) with a bias of −3.9% and a CA of 94.2% (95% CI: 87.7%–97.3%). CONCLUSIONS: UMIC(®) Cefiderocol is a valid method for the determination of cefiderocol MICs even if higher than expected discrepancies were observed with NDM-producing Enterobacterales, which presented in most cases MIC values close to the breakpoint.