Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The role of molnupiravir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review until 1 November 2022 searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving COVID-19 patients comparing molnupiravir [±standard of care (SoC)] versus SoC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad132 |
_version_ | 1785068394412769280 |
---|---|
author | Malin, Jakob J Weibel, Stephanie Gruell, Henning Kreuzberger, Nina Stegemann, Miriam Skoetz, Nicole |
author_facet | Malin, Jakob J Weibel, Stephanie Gruell, Henning Kreuzberger, Nina Stegemann, Miriam Skoetz, Nicole |
author_sort | Malin, Jakob J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of molnupiravir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review until 1 November 2022 searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving COVID-19 patients comparing molnupiravir [±standard of care (SoC)] versus SoC and/or placebo. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were identified, eight investigated outpatients (29 254 participants) and one inpatients (304 participants). Compared with placebo/SoC, molnupiravir does not reduce mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% CI 0.07–1.02, high-certainty evidence] and probably does not reduce the risk for ‘hospitalization or death’ (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55–1.20, moderate-certainty evidence) by Day 28 in COVID-19 outpatients. We are uncertain whether molnupiravir increases symptom resolution by Day 14 (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.41, very-low-certainty evidence) but it may make no difference by Day 28 (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.19, low-certainty evidence). In inpatients, molnupiravir may increase mortality by Day 28 compared with placebo (RR 3.78, 95% CI 0.50–28.82, low-certainty evidence). There is little to no difference in serious adverse and adverse events during the study period in COVID-19 inpatients/outpatients treated with molnupiravir compared with placebo/SoC (moderate- to high-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: In a predominantly immunized population of COVID-19 outpatients, molnupiravir has no effect on mortality, probably none on ‘hospitalization or death’ and effects on symptom resolution are uncertain. Molnupiravir was safe during the study period in outpatients although a potential increase in inpatient mortality requires careful monitoring in ongoing clinical research. Our analysis does not support routine use of molnupiravir for COVID-19 treatment in immunocompetent individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10320168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103201682023-07-06 Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Malin, Jakob J Weibel, Stephanie Gruell, Henning Kreuzberger, Nina Stegemann, Miriam Skoetz, Nicole J Antimicrob Chemother Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The role of molnupiravir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review until 1 November 2022 searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving COVID-19 patients comparing molnupiravir [±standard of care (SoC)] versus SoC and/or placebo. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were identified, eight investigated outpatients (29 254 participants) and one inpatients (304 participants). Compared with placebo/SoC, molnupiravir does not reduce mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% CI 0.07–1.02, high-certainty evidence] and probably does not reduce the risk for ‘hospitalization or death’ (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55–1.20, moderate-certainty evidence) by Day 28 in COVID-19 outpatients. We are uncertain whether molnupiravir increases symptom resolution by Day 14 (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.41, very-low-certainty evidence) but it may make no difference by Day 28 (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.19, low-certainty evidence). In inpatients, molnupiravir may increase mortality by Day 28 compared with placebo (RR 3.78, 95% CI 0.50–28.82, low-certainty evidence). There is little to no difference in serious adverse and adverse events during the study period in COVID-19 inpatients/outpatients treated with molnupiravir compared with placebo/SoC (moderate- to high-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: In a predominantly immunized population of COVID-19 outpatients, molnupiravir has no effect on mortality, probably none on ‘hospitalization or death’ and effects on symptom resolution are uncertain. Molnupiravir was safe during the study period in outpatients although a potential increase in inpatient mortality requires careful monitoring in ongoing clinical research. Our analysis does not support routine use of molnupiravir for COVID-19 treatment in immunocompetent individuals. Oxford University Press 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10320168/ /pubmed/37170886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad132 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Malin, Jakob J Weibel, Stephanie Gruell, Henning Kreuzberger, Nina Stegemann, Miriam Skoetz, Nicole Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of sars-cov-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malinjakobj efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weibelstephanie efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gruellhenning efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kreuzbergernina efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stegemannmiriam efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT skoetznicole efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |