Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The role of molnupiravir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review until 1 November 2022 searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving COVID-19 patients comparing molnupiravir [±standard of care (SoC)] versus SoC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malin, Jakob J, Weibel, Stephanie, Gruell, Henning, Kreuzberger, Nina, Stegemann, Miriam, Skoetz, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad132
_version_ 1785068394412769280
author Malin, Jakob J
Weibel, Stephanie
Gruell, Henning
Kreuzberger, Nina
Stegemann, Miriam
Skoetz, Nicole
author_facet Malin, Jakob J
Weibel, Stephanie
Gruell, Henning
Kreuzberger, Nina
Stegemann, Miriam
Skoetz, Nicole
author_sort Malin, Jakob J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of molnupiravir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review until 1 November 2022 searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving COVID-19 patients comparing molnupiravir [±standard of care (SoC)] versus SoC and/or placebo. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were identified, eight investigated outpatients (29 254 participants) and one inpatients (304 participants). Compared with placebo/SoC, molnupiravir does not reduce mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% CI 0.07–1.02, high-certainty evidence] and probably does not reduce the risk for ‘hospitalization or death’ (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55–1.20, moderate-certainty evidence) by Day 28 in COVID-19 outpatients. We are uncertain whether molnupiravir increases symptom resolution by Day 14 (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.41, very-low-certainty evidence) but it may make no difference by Day 28 (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.19, low-certainty evidence). In inpatients, molnupiravir may increase mortality by Day 28 compared with placebo (RR 3.78, 95% CI 0.50–28.82, low-certainty evidence). There is little to no difference in serious adverse and adverse events during the study period in COVID-19 inpatients/outpatients treated with molnupiravir compared with placebo/SoC (moderate- to high-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: In a predominantly immunized population of COVID-19 outpatients, molnupiravir has no effect on mortality, probably none on ‘hospitalization or death’ and effects on symptom resolution are uncertain. Molnupiravir was safe during the study period in outpatients although a potential increase in inpatient mortality requires careful monitoring in ongoing clinical research. Our analysis does not support routine use of molnupiravir for COVID-19 treatment in immunocompetent individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10320168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103201682023-07-06 Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Malin, Jakob J Weibel, Stephanie Gruell, Henning Kreuzberger, Nina Stegemann, Miriam Skoetz, Nicole J Antimicrob Chemother Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The role of molnupiravir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review until 1 November 2022 searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving COVID-19 patients comparing molnupiravir [±standard of care (SoC)] versus SoC and/or placebo. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were identified, eight investigated outpatients (29 254 participants) and one inpatients (304 participants). Compared with placebo/SoC, molnupiravir does not reduce mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% CI 0.07–1.02, high-certainty evidence] and probably does not reduce the risk for ‘hospitalization or death’ (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55–1.20, moderate-certainty evidence) by Day 28 in COVID-19 outpatients. We are uncertain whether molnupiravir increases symptom resolution by Day 14 (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.41, very-low-certainty evidence) but it may make no difference by Day 28 (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.19, low-certainty evidence). In inpatients, molnupiravir may increase mortality by Day 28 compared with placebo (RR 3.78, 95% CI 0.50–28.82, low-certainty evidence). There is little to no difference in serious adverse and adverse events during the study period in COVID-19 inpatients/outpatients treated with molnupiravir compared with placebo/SoC (moderate- to high-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: In a predominantly immunized population of COVID-19 outpatients, molnupiravir has no effect on mortality, probably none on ‘hospitalization or death’ and effects on symptom resolution are uncertain. Molnupiravir was safe during the study period in outpatients although a potential increase in inpatient mortality requires careful monitoring in ongoing clinical research. Our analysis does not support routine use of molnupiravir for COVID-19 treatment in immunocompetent individuals. Oxford University Press 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10320168/ /pubmed/37170886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad132 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Malin, Jakob J
Weibel, Stephanie
Gruell, Henning
Kreuzberger, Nina
Stegemann, Miriam
Skoetz, Nicole
Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for the treatment of sars-cov-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad132
work_keys_str_mv AT malinjakobj efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weibelstephanie efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gruellhenning efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kreuzbergernina efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stegemannmiriam efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT skoetznicole efficacyandsafetyofmolnupiravirforthetreatmentofsarscov2infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis