Cargando…
Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method that has been used to alter cognition in hundreds of experiments. During tDCS, a low-amplitude current is delivered via scalp electrodes to create a weak electric field in the brain. The weak electric field cause...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1101490 |
_version_ | 1785068406294183936 |
---|---|
author | Majdi, Alireza Asamoah, Boateng Mc Laughlin, Myles |
author_facet | Majdi, Alireza Asamoah, Boateng Mc Laughlin, Myles |
author_sort | Majdi, Alireza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method that has been used to alter cognition in hundreds of experiments. During tDCS, a low-amplitude current is delivered via scalp electrodes to create a weak electric field in the brain. The weak electric field causes membrane polarization in cortical neurons directly under the scalp electrodes. It is generally assumed that this mechanism causes the observed effects of tDCS on cognition. However, it was recently shown that some tDCS effects are not caused by the electric field in the brain but rather via co-stimulation of cranial and cervical nerves in the scalp that also have neuromodulatory effects that can influence cognition. This peripheral nerve co-stimulation mechanism is not controlled for in tDCS experiments that use the standard sham condition. In light of this new evidence, results from previous tDCS experiments could be reinterpreted in terms of a peripheral nerve co-stimulation mechanism. Here, we selected six publications that reported tDCS effects on cognition and attributed the effects to the electric field in the brain directly under the electrode. We then posed the question: given the known neuromodulatory effects of cranial and cervical nerve stimulation, could the reported results also be understood in terms of tDCS peripheral nerve co-stimulation? We present our re-interpretation of these results as a way to stimulate debate within the neuromodulation field and as a food-for-thought for researchers designing new tDCS experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10320219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103202192023-07-06 Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism Majdi, Alireza Asamoah, Boateng Mc Laughlin, Myles Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method that has been used to alter cognition in hundreds of experiments. During tDCS, a low-amplitude current is delivered via scalp electrodes to create a weak electric field in the brain. The weak electric field causes membrane polarization in cortical neurons directly under the scalp electrodes. It is generally assumed that this mechanism causes the observed effects of tDCS on cognition. However, it was recently shown that some tDCS effects are not caused by the electric field in the brain but rather via co-stimulation of cranial and cervical nerves in the scalp that also have neuromodulatory effects that can influence cognition. This peripheral nerve co-stimulation mechanism is not controlled for in tDCS experiments that use the standard sham condition. In light of this new evidence, results from previous tDCS experiments could be reinterpreted in terms of a peripheral nerve co-stimulation mechanism. Here, we selected six publications that reported tDCS effects on cognition and attributed the effects to the electric field in the brain directly under the electrode. We then posed the question: given the known neuromodulatory effects of cranial and cervical nerve stimulation, could the reported results also be understood in terms of tDCS peripheral nerve co-stimulation? We present our re-interpretation of these results as a way to stimulate debate within the neuromodulation field and as a food-for-thought for researchers designing new tDCS experiments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10320219/ /pubmed/37415857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1101490 Text en Copyright © 2023 Majdi, Asamoah and Mc Laughlin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Majdi, Alireza Asamoah, Boateng Mc Laughlin, Myles Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism |
title | Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism |
title_full | Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism |
title_fullStr | Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism |
title_full_unstemmed | Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism |
title_short | Reinterpreting published tDCS results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism |
title_sort | reinterpreting published tdcs results in terms of a cranial and cervical nerve co-stimulation mechanism |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1101490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majdialireza reinterpretingpublishedtdcsresultsintermsofacranialandcervicalnervecostimulationmechanism AT asamoahboateng reinterpretingpublishedtdcsresultsintermsofacranialandcervicalnervecostimulationmechanism AT mclaughlinmyles reinterpretingpublishedtdcsresultsintermsofacranialandcervicalnervecostimulationmechanism |