Cargando…

Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors

INTRODUCTION: A major share of poisoning cases are perpetrated intentionally, but this varies depending on different geographical regions, age spectrums, and gender distribution. The present study was conducted to determine the most important factors affecting intentional and unintentional poisoning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veisani, Yousef, Sayyadi, Hojjat, Sahebi, Ali, Moradi, Ghobad, Mohamadian, Fathola, Delpisheh, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17337
_version_ 1785068417189937152
author Veisani, Yousef
Sayyadi, Hojjat
Sahebi, Ali
Moradi, Ghobad
Mohamadian, Fathola
Delpisheh, Ali
author_facet Veisani, Yousef
Sayyadi, Hojjat
Sahebi, Ali
Moradi, Ghobad
Mohamadian, Fathola
Delpisheh, Ali
author_sort Veisani, Yousef
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A major share of poisoning cases are perpetrated intentionally, but this varies depending on different geographical regions, age spectrums, and gender distribution. The present study was conducted to determine the most important factors affecting intentional and unintentional poisonings using machine learning algorithms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current cross-sectional study was conducted on 658 people hospitalized due to poisoning. The enrollment and follow-up of patients were carried out during 2020–2021. The data obtained from patients’ files and during follow-up were recorded by a physician and entered into SPSS software by the registration expert. Different machine learning algorithms were used to analyze the data. Fit models of the training data were assessed by determining accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-measure, and the area under the rock curve (AUC). Finally, after analyzing the models, the data of the Gradient boosted trees (GBT) model were finalized. RESULTS: The GBT model rendered the highest accuracy (91.5 ± 3.4) among other models tested. Also, the GBT model had significantly higher sensitivity (94.7 ± 1.7) and specificity (93.2 ± 4.1) compared to other models (P < 0.001). The most prominent predictors based on the GBT model were the route of poison entry (weight = 0.583), place of residence (weight = 0.137), history of psychiatric diseases (weight = 0.087), and age (weight = 0.085). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests the GBT model as a reliable predictor model for identifying the factors affecting intentional and unintentional poisoning. According to our results, the determinants of intentional poisoning included the route of poison entry into the body, place of residence, and the heart rate. The most important predictors of unintentional poisoning were age, exposure to benzodiazepine, creatinine levels, and occupation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10320267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103202672023-07-06 Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors Veisani, Yousef Sayyadi, Hojjat Sahebi, Ali Moradi, Ghobad Mohamadian, Fathola Delpisheh, Ali Heliyon Research Article INTRODUCTION: A major share of poisoning cases are perpetrated intentionally, but this varies depending on different geographical regions, age spectrums, and gender distribution. The present study was conducted to determine the most important factors affecting intentional and unintentional poisonings using machine learning algorithms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current cross-sectional study was conducted on 658 people hospitalized due to poisoning. The enrollment and follow-up of patients were carried out during 2020–2021. The data obtained from patients’ files and during follow-up were recorded by a physician and entered into SPSS software by the registration expert. Different machine learning algorithms were used to analyze the data. Fit models of the training data were assessed by determining accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-measure, and the area under the rock curve (AUC). Finally, after analyzing the models, the data of the Gradient boosted trees (GBT) model were finalized. RESULTS: The GBT model rendered the highest accuracy (91.5 ± 3.4) among other models tested. Also, the GBT model had significantly higher sensitivity (94.7 ± 1.7) and specificity (93.2 ± 4.1) compared to other models (P < 0.001). The most prominent predictors based on the GBT model were the route of poison entry (weight = 0.583), place of residence (weight = 0.137), history of psychiatric diseases (weight = 0.087), and age (weight = 0.085). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests the GBT model as a reliable predictor model for identifying the factors affecting intentional and unintentional poisoning. According to our results, the determinants of intentional poisoning included the route of poison entry into the body, place of residence, and the heart rate. The most important predictors of unintentional poisoning were age, exposure to benzodiazepine, creatinine levels, and occupation. Elsevier 2023-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10320267/ /pubmed/37416637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17337 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Veisani, Yousef
Sayyadi, Hojjat
Sahebi, Ali
Moradi, Ghobad
Mohamadian, Fathola
Delpisheh, Ali
Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors
title Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors
title_full Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors
title_fullStr Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors
title_short Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors
title_sort comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17337
work_keys_str_mv AT veisaniyousef comparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmstopredictintentionalandunintentionalpoisoningriskfactors
AT sayyadihojjat comparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmstopredictintentionalandunintentionalpoisoningriskfactors
AT sahebiali comparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmstopredictintentionalandunintentionalpoisoningriskfactors
AT moradighobad comparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmstopredictintentionalandunintentionalpoisoningriskfactors
AT mohamadianfathola comparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmstopredictintentionalandunintentionalpoisoningriskfactors
AT delpishehali comparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmstopredictintentionalandunintentionalpoisoningriskfactors