Cargando…
Meta-analyses in psychology often overestimate evidence for and size of effects
Adjusting for publication bias is essential when drawing meta-analytic inferences. However, most methods that adjust for publication bias do not perform well across a range of research conditions, such as the degree of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies. Sladekova et al. 2022 (Estimating t...
Autores principales: | Bartoš, František, Maier, Maximilian, Shanks, David R., Stanley, T. D., Sladekova, Martina, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230224 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Bayesian bird's eye view of ‘Replications of important results in social psychology’
por: Marsman, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias
por: Maier, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Published correlational effect sizes in social and developmental psychology
por: Weinerová, Josefína, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A survey on how preregistration affects the research workflow: better science but more work
por: Sarafoglou, Alexandra, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology
por: Boyce, Veronica, et al.
Publicado: (2023)