Cargando…

Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios

Timely follow-up care after an abnormal cervical cancer screening test result is critical to the prevention and early diagnosis of cervical cancer. The current inadequate and inequitable delivery of these potentially life-saving services is attributed to several factors, including patient out-of-poc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rockwell, Michelle S., Armbruster, Shannon D., Capucao, Jillian C., Russell, Kyle B., Rockwell, John A., Perkins, Karen E., Huffstetler, Alison N., Mafi, John N., Fendrick, A. Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0531
_version_ 1785068453694013440
author Rockwell, Michelle S.
Armbruster, Shannon D.
Capucao, Jillian C.
Russell, Kyle B.
Rockwell, John A.
Perkins, Karen E.
Huffstetler, Alison N.
Mafi, John N.
Fendrick, A. Mark
author_facet Rockwell, Michelle S.
Armbruster, Shannon D.
Capucao, Jillian C.
Russell, Kyle B.
Rockwell, John A.
Perkins, Karen E.
Huffstetler, Alison N.
Mafi, John N.
Fendrick, A. Mark
author_sort Rockwell, Michelle S.
collection PubMed
description Timely follow-up care after an abnormal cervical cancer screening test result is critical to the prevention and early diagnosis of cervical cancer. The current inadequate and inequitable delivery of these potentially life-saving services is attributed to several factors, including patient out-of-pocket costs. Waiving of consumer cost-sharing for follow-up testing (e.g., colposcopy and related cervical services) is likely to improve access and uptake, especially among underserved populations. One approach to defray the incremental costs of providing more generous coverage for follow-up testing is reducing expenditures on “low-value” cervical cancer screening services. To explore the potential fiscal implications of a policy that redirects cervical cancer screening resources from potentially low- to high-value clinical scenarios, we analyzed 2019 claims from the Virginia All-Payer Claims Database to quantify (i) total spending on low-value cervical cancer screening and (ii) out-of-pocket costs associated with colposcopy and related cervical services among commercially insured Virginians. In a cohort of 1,806,921 female patients (ages 48.1 ± 24.8 years), 295,193 claims for cervical cancer screening were reported, 100,567 (34.0%) of which were determined to be low-value ($4,394,361 total; $4,172,777 for payers and $221,584 out-of-pocket [$2/patient]). Claims for 52,369 colposcopy and related cervical services were reported ($40,994,016 total; $33,457,518 for payers and $7,536,498 out-of-pocket [$144/patient]). These findings suggest that reallocating savings incurred from unnecessary spending to fund more generous coverage of necessary follow-up care is a feasible approach to enhancing cervical cancer prevention equity and outcomes. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Out-of-pocket fees are a barrier to follow-up care after an abnormal cervical cancer screening test. Among commercially insured Virginians, out-of-pocket costs for follow-up services averaged $144/patient; 34% of cervical cancer screenings were classified as low value. Reallocating low-value cervical cancer screening expenditures to enhance coverage for follow-up care can improve screening outcomes. See related Spotlight, p. 363
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10320459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103204592023-07-06 Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios Rockwell, Michelle S. Armbruster, Shannon D. Capucao, Jillian C. Russell, Kyle B. Rockwell, John A. Perkins, Karen E. Huffstetler, Alison N. Mafi, John N. Fendrick, A. Mark Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Research Brief Timely follow-up care after an abnormal cervical cancer screening test result is critical to the prevention and early diagnosis of cervical cancer. The current inadequate and inequitable delivery of these potentially life-saving services is attributed to several factors, including patient out-of-pocket costs. Waiving of consumer cost-sharing for follow-up testing (e.g., colposcopy and related cervical services) is likely to improve access and uptake, especially among underserved populations. One approach to defray the incremental costs of providing more generous coverage for follow-up testing is reducing expenditures on “low-value” cervical cancer screening services. To explore the potential fiscal implications of a policy that redirects cervical cancer screening resources from potentially low- to high-value clinical scenarios, we analyzed 2019 claims from the Virginia All-Payer Claims Database to quantify (i) total spending on low-value cervical cancer screening and (ii) out-of-pocket costs associated with colposcopy and related cervical services among commercially insured Virginians. In a cohort of 1,806,921 female patients (ages 48.1 ± 24.8 years), 295,193 claims for cervical cancer screening were reported, 100,567 (34.0%) of which were determined to be low-value ($4,394,361 total; $4,172,777 for payers and $221,584 out-of-pocket [$2/patient]). Claims for 52,369 colposcopy and related cervical services were reported ($40,994,016 total; $33,457,518 for payers and $7,536,498 out-of-pocket [$144/patient]). These findings suggest that reallocating savings incurred from unnecessary spending to fund more generous coverage of necessary follow-up care is a feasible approach to enhancing cervical cancer prevention equity and outcomes. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Out-of-pocket fees are a barrier to follow-up care after an abnormal cervical cancer screening test. Among commercially insured Virginians, out-of-pocket costs for follow-up services averaged $144/patient; 34% of cervical cancer screenings were classified as low value. Reallocating low-value cervical cancer screening expenditures to enhance coverage for follow-up care can improve screening outcomes. See related Spotlight, p. 363 American Association for Cancer Research 2023-07-05 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10320459/ /pubmed/36976753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0531 Text en ©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Research Brief
Rockwell, Michelle S.
Armbruster, Shannon D.
Capucao, Jillian C.
Russell, Kyle B.
Rockwell, John A.
Perkins, Karen E.
Huffstetler, Alison N.
Mafi, John N.
Fendrick, A. Mark
Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios
title Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios
title_full Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios
title_fullStr Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios
title_short Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios
title_sort reallocating cervical cancer preventive service spending from low- to high-value clinical scenarios
topic Research Brief
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0531
work_keys_str_mv AT rockwellmichelles reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT armbrustershannond reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT capucaojillianc reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT russellkyleb reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT rockwelljohna reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT perkinskarene reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT huffstetleralisonn reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT mafijohnn reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios
AT fendrickamark reallocatingcervicalcancerpreventiveservicespendingfromlowtohighvalueclinicalscenarios