Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening

The first biomarker-based cervical cancer screening test, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS), has been clinically validated and approved in the United States for triage of women being screened for cervical cancer who test positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). The primary aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harper, Diane M., Anderson, Rye J., Baker, Ed, Yu, Tiffany M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0455
_version_ 1785068454872612864
author Harper, Diane M.
Anderson, Rye J.
Baker, Ed
Yu, Tiffany M.
author_facet Harper, Diane M.
Anderson, Rye J.
Baker, Ed
Yu, Tiffany M.
author_sort Harper, Diane M.
collection PubMed
description The first biomarker-based cervical cancer screening test, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS), has been clinically validated and approved in the United States for triage of women being screened for cervical cancer who test positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). The primary aim of this work is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DS triage after co-testing findings of positive non-16/18 HPV types and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cytology. A payer-perspective Markov microsimulation model was developed to assess the impact of DS reflex testing. Each comparison simulated 12,250 screening-eligible women through health states defined by hrHPV status and genotype, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1–3, invasive cervical cancer (ICC) by stage, and cancer-related or non-cancer death. Screening test performance data were from the IMPACT clinical validation trial. Transition probabilities were from population and natural history studies. Costs of baseline medical care, screening visits, tests, procedures, and ICC were included. DS reflex after co-testing was cost-effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life-year gained of $15,231 [95% confidence interval (CI), $10,717–$25,400] compared with co-testing with hrHPV pooled primary and genotyped reflex testing, and $23,487 (95% CI, $15,745–$46,175) compared with co-testing with hrHPV genotyping with no reflex test. Screening and medical costs and life-years increased, while ICC costs and risk of ICC death decreased. Incorporating DS reflex into co-testing cervical cancer screening algorithms is projected to be cost-effective. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: The p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS) test was recently approved in the United States as a reflex test for cervical cancer screening following positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test results. Adding DS reflex to hrHPV and cervical cytology co-testing strategies in the United States is expected to be cost-effective per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10320467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103204672023-07-06 Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening Harper, Diane M. Anderson, Rye J. Baker, Ed Yu, Tiffany M. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Research Articles The first biomarker-based cervical cancer screening test, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS), has been clinically validated and approved in the United States for triage of women being screened for cervical cancer who test positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). The primary aim of this work is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DS triage after co-testing findings of positive non-16/18 HPV types and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cytology. A payer-perspective Markov microsimulation model was developed to assess the impact of DS reflex testing. Each comparison simulated 12,250 screening-eligible women through health states defined by hrHPV status and genotype, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1–3, invasive cervical cancer (ICC) by stage, and cancer-related or non-cancer death. Screening test performance data were from the IMPACT clinical validation trial. Transition probabilities were from population and natural history studies. Costs of baseline medical care, screening visits, tests, procedures, and ICC were included. DS reflex after co-testing was cost-effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life-year gained of $15,231 [95% confidence interval (CI), $10,717–$25,400] compared with co-testing with hrHPV pooled primary and genotyped reflex testing, and $23,487 (95% CI, $15,745–$46,175) compared with co-testing with hrHPV genotyping with no reflex test. Screening and medical costs and life-years increased, while ICC costs and risk of ICC death decreased. Incorporating DS reflex into co-testing cervical cancer screening algorithms is projected to be cost-effective. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: The p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS) test was recently approved in the United States as a reflex test for cervical cancer screening following positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test results. Adding DS reflex to hrHPV and cervical cytology co-testing strategies in the United States is expected to be cost-effective per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained. American Association for Cancer Research 2023-07-05 2023-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10320467/ /pubmed/37210751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0455 Text en ©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Harper, Diane M.
Anderson, Rye J.
Baker, Ed
Yu, Tiffany M.
Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening
title Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_full Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_short Cost-effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_sort cost-effectiveness of p16/ki-67 dual-stained cytology reflex following co-testing with hrhpv genotyping for cervical cancer screening
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0455
work_keys_str_mv AT harperdianem costeffectivenessofp16ki67dualstainedcytologyreflexfollowingcotestingwithhrhpvgenotypingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT andersonryej costeffectivenessofp16ki67dualstainedcytologyreflexfollowingcotestingwithhrhpvgenotypingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT bakered costeffectivenessofp16ki67dualstainedcytologyreflexfollowingcotestingwithhrhpvgenotypingforcervicalcancerscreening
AT yutiffanym costeffectivenessofp16ki67dualstainedcytologyreflexfollowingcotestingwithhrhpvgenotypingforcervicalcancerscreening