Cargando…

Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial

BACKGROUND: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient's symptoms improvement after PAE and medical treatment. METHODS: A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sapoval, Marc, Thiounn, Nicolas, Descazeaud, Aurélien, Déan, Carole, Ruffion, Alain, Pagnoux, Gaële, Duarte, Ricardo Codas, Robert, Grégoire, Petitpierre, Francois, Karsenty, Gilles, Vidal, Vincent, Murez, Thibaut, Vernhet-Kovacsik, Hélène, de la Taille, Alexandre, Kobeiter, Hicham, Mathieu, Romain, Heautot, Jean-Francois, Droupy, Stéphane, Frandon, Julien, Barry Delongchamps, Nicolas, Korb-Savoldelli, Virginie, Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle, Pereira, Helena, Chatellier, Gilles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100672
_version_ 1785068479277170688
author Sapoval, Marc
Thiounn, Nicolas
Descazeaud, Aurélien
Déan, Carole
Ruffion, Alain
Pagnoux, Gaële
Duarte, Ricardo Codas
Robert, Grégoire
Petitpierre, Francois
Karsenty, Gilles
Vidal, Vincent
Murez, Thibaut
Vernhet-Kovacsik, Hélène
de la Taille, Alexandre
Kobeiter, Hicham
Mathieu, Romain
Heautot, Jean-Francois
Droupy, Stéphane
Frandon, Julien
Barry Delongchamps, Nicolas
Korb-Savoldelli, Virginie
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Pereira, Helena
Chatellier, Gilles
author_facet Sapoval, Marc
Thiounn, Nicolas
Descazeaud, Aurélien
Déan, Carole
Ruffion, Alain
Pagnoux, Gaële
Duarte, Ricardo Codas
Robert, Grégoire
Petitpierre, Francois
Karsenty, Gilles
Vidal, Vincent
Murez, Thibaut
Vernhet-Kovacsik, Hélène
de la Taille, Alexandre
Kobeiter, Hicham
Mathieu, Romain
Heautot, Jean-Francois
Droupy, Stéphane
Frandon, Julien
Barry Delongchamps, Nicolas
Korb-Savoldelli, Virginie
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Pereira, Helena
Chatellier, Gilles
author_sort Sapoval, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient's symptoms improvement after PAE and medical treatment. METHODS: A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French hospitals. Patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) defined by International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) > 11 and quality of life (QoL) > 3, and BPH ≥50 ml resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to PAE or Combined Therapy ([CT], oral dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg per day). Randomisation was stratified by centre, IPSS and prostate volume with a minimisation procedure. The primary outcome was the 9-month IPSS change. Primary and safety analysis were done according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle among patients with an evaluable primary outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869971. FINDINGS: Ninety patients were randomised from September 2016 to February 2020, and 44 and 43 patients assessed for primary endpoint in PAE and CT groups, respectively. The 9-month change of IPSS was −10.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −11.8 to −8.3) and −5.7 (95% CI: −7.5 to −3.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. This reduction was significantly greater in the PAE group than in the CT group (−4.4 [95% CI: −6.9 to −1.9], p = 0.0008). The IIEF-15 score change was 8.2 (95% CI: 2.9–13.5) and −2.8 (95% CI: −8.4 to 2.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. No treatment-related AE or hospitalisation was noticed. After 9 months, 5 and 18 patients had invasive prostate re-treatment in the PAE and CT group, respectively. INTERPRETATION: In patients with BPH ≥50 ml and bothersome LUTS resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy, PAE provides more urinary and sexual symptoms benefit than CT up to 24 months. FUNDING: French 10.13039/100009647Ministry of Health and a complementary grant from 10.13039/100019484Merit Medical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10320610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103206102023-07-06 Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial Sapoval, Marc Thiounn, Nicolas Descazeaud, Aurélien Déan, Carole Ruffion, Alain Pagnoux, Gaële Duarte, Ricardo Codas Robert, Grégoire Petitpierre, Francois Karsenty, Gilles Vidal, Vincent Murez, Thibaut Vernhet-Kovacsik, Hélène de la Taille, Alexandre Kobeiter, Hicham Mathieu, Romain Heautot, Jean-Francois Droupy, Stéphane Frandon, Julien Barry Delongchamps, Nicolas Korb-Savoldelli, Virginie Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle Pereira, Helena Chatellier, Gilles Lancet Reg Health Eur Articles BACKGROUND: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient's symptoms improvement after PAE and medical treatment. METHODS: A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French hospitals. Patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) defined by International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) > 11 and quality of life (QoL) > 3, and BPH ≥50 ml resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to PAE or Combined Therapy ([CT], oral dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg per day). Randomisation was stratified by centre, IPSS and prostate volume with a minimisation procedure. The primary outcome was the 9-month IPSS change. Primary and safety analysis were done according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle among patients with an evaluable primary outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869971. FINDINGS: Ninety patients were randomised from September 2016 to February 2020, and 44 and 43 patients assessed for primary endpoint in PAE and CT groups, respectively. The 9-month change of IPSS was −10.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −11.8 to −8.3) and −5.7 (95% CI: −7.5 to −3.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. This reduction was significantly greater in the PAE group than in the CT group (−4.4 [95% CI: −6.9 to −1.9], p = 0.0008). The IIEF-15 score change was 8.2 (95% CI: 2.9–13.5) and −2.8 (95% CI: −8.4 to 2.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. No treatment-related AE or hospitalisation was noticed. After 9 months, 5 and 18 patients had invasive prostate re-treatment in the PAE and CT group, respectively. INTERPRETATION: In patients with BPH ≥50 ml and bothersome LUTS resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy, PAE provides more urinary and sexual symptoms benefit than CT up to 24 months. FUNDING: French 10.13039/100009647Ministry of Health and a complementary grant from 10.13039/100019484Merit Medical. Elsevier 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10320610/ /pubmed/37415648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100672 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Sapoval, Marc
Thiounn, Nicolas
Descazeaud, Aurélien
Déan, Carole
Ruffion, Alain
Pagnoux, Gaële
Duarte, Ricardo Codas
Robert, Grégoire
Petitpierre, Francois
Karsenty, Gilles
Vidal, Vincent
Murez, Thibaut
Vernhet-Kovacsik, Hélène
de la Taille, Alexandre
Kobeiter, Hicham
Mathieu, Romain
Heautot, Jean-Francois
Droupy, Stéphane
Frandon, Julien
Barry Delongchamps, Nicolas
Korb-Savoldelli, Virginie
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Pereira, Helena
Chatellier, Gilles
Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial
title Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial
title_full Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial
title_fullStr Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial
title_short Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial
title_sort prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (partem): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100672
work_keys_str_mv AT sapovalmarc prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT thiounnnicolas prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT descazeaudaurelien prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT deancarole prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT ruffionalain prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT pagnouxgaele prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT duartericardocodas prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT robertgregoire prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT petitpierrefrancois prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT karsentygilles prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT vidalvincent prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT murezthibaut prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT vernhetkovacsikhelene prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT delataillealexandre prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT kobeiterhicham prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT mathieuromain prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT heautotjeanfrancois prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT droupystephane prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT frandonjulien prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT barrydelongchampsnicolas prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT korbsavoldellivirginie prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT durandzaleskiisabelle prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT pereirahelena prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT chatelliergilles prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial
AT prostaticarteryembolisationversusmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiapartemarandomisedmulticentreopenlabelphase3superioritytrial