Cargando…
Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach
BACKGROUND: Precision oncology medicines represent a paradigm shift compared to non-precision oncology medicines in cancer therapy, in some situations delivering more clinical benefit, and potentially lowering healthcare costs. We determined whether employing a companion diagnostic (CDx) approach du...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00590-9 |
_version_ | 1785068516252057600 |
---|---|
author | Henderson, Raymond H. French, Declan Stewart, Elaine Smart, Dave Idica, Adam Redmond, Sandra Eckstein, Markus Clark, Jordan Sullivan, Richard Keeling, Peter Lawler, Mark |
author_facet | Henderson, Raymond H. French, Declan Stewart, Elaine Smart, Dave Idica, Adam Redmond, Sandra Eckstein, Markus Clark, Jordan Sullivan, Richard Keeling, Peter Lawler, Mark |
author_sort | Henderson, Raymond H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Precision oncology medicines represent a paradigm shift compared to non-precision oncology medicines in cancer therapy, in some situations delivering more clinical benefit, and potentially lowering healthcare costs. We determined whether employing a companion diagnostic (CDx) approach during oncology medicines development delivers effective therapies that are within the cost constraints of current health systems. R&D costs of developing a medicine are subject to debate, with average estimates ranging from $765 million (m) to $4.6 billion (b). Our aim was to determine whether precision oncology medicines are cheaper to bring from R&D to market; a secondary goal was to determine whether precision oncology medicines have a greater return on investment (ROI). METHOD: Data on oncology medicines approved between 1997 and 2020 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were analysed from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. Data were compiled from 10-K, 10-Q, and 20-F financial performance filings on medicines’ development costs through their R&D lifetime. Clinical trial data were split into clinical trial phases 1–3 and probability of success (POS) of trials was calculated, along with preclinical costs. Cost-of-capital (CoC) approach was applied and, if appropriate, a tax rebate was subtracted from the total. RESULTS: Data on 42 precision and 29 non-precision oncology medicines from 56 companies listed by the National Cancer Institute which had complete data available were analysed. Estimated mean cost to deliver a new oncology medicine was $4.4b (95% CI, $3.6–5.2b). Costs to bring a precision oncology medicine to market were $1.1b less ($3.5b; 95% CI, $2.7–4.5b) compared to non-precision oncology medicines ($4.6b; 95% CI, $3.5–6.1b). The key driver of costs was POS of clinical trials, accounting for a difference of $591.3 m. Additional data analysis illustrated that there was a 27% increase in return on investment (ROI) of precision oncology medicines over non-precision oncology medicines. CONCLUSION: Our results provide an accurate estimate of the R&D spend required to bring an oncology medicine to market. Deployment of a CDx at the earliest stage substantially lowers the cost associated with oncology medicines development, potentially making them available to more patients, while staying within the cost constraints of cancer health systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-023-00590-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10320864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103208642023-07-06 Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach Henderson, Raymond H. French, Declan Stewart, Elaine Smart, Dave Idica, Adam Redmond, Sandra Eckstein, Markus Clark, Jordan Sullivan, Richard Keeling, Peter Lawler, Mark J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: Precision oncology medicines represent a paradigm shift compared to non-precision oncology medicines in cancer therapy, in some situations delivering more clinical benefit, and potentially lowering healthcare costs. We determined whether employing a companion diagnostic (CDx) approach during oncology medicines development delivers effective therapies that are within the cost constraints of current health systems. R&D costs of developing a medicine are subject to debate, with average estimates ranging from $765 million (m) to $4.6 billion (b). Our aim was to determine whether precision oncology medicines are cheaper to bring from R&D to market; a secondary goal was to determine whether precision oncology medicines have a greater return on investment (ROI). METHOD: Data on oncology medicines approved between 1997 and 2020 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were analysed from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. Data were compiled from 10-K, 10-Q, and 20-F financial performance filings on medicines’ development costs through their R&D lifetime. Clinical trial data were split into clinical trial phases 1–3 and probability of success (POS) of trials was calculated, along with preclinical costs. Cost-of-capital (CoC) approach was applied and, if appropriate, a tax rebate was subtracted from the total. RESULTS: Data on 42 precision and 29 non-precision oncology medicines from 56 companies listed by the National Cancer Institute which had complete data available were analysed. Estimated mean cost to deliver a new oncology medicine was $4.4b (95% CI, $3.6–5.2b). Costs to bring a precision oncology medicine to market were $1.1b less ($3.5b; 95% CI, $2.7–4.5b) compared to non-precision oncology medicines ($4.6b; 95% CI, $3.5–6.1b). The key driver of costs was POS of clinical trials, accounting for a difference of $591.3 m. Additional data analysis illustrated that there was a 27% increase in return on investment (ROI) of precision oncology medicines over non-precision oncology medicines. CONCLUSION: Our results provide an accurate estimate of the R&D spend required to bring an oncology medicine to market. Deployment of a CDx at the earliest stage substantially lowers the cost associated with oncology medicines development, potentially making them available to more patients, while staying within the cost constraints of cancer health systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-023-00590-9. BioMed Central 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10320864/ /pubmed/37408046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00590-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Henderson, Raymond H. French, Declan Stewart, Elaine Smart, Dave Idica, Adam Redmond, Sandra Eckstein, Markus Clark, Jordan Sullivan, Richard Keeling, Peter Lawler, Mark Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach |
title | Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach |
title_full | Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach |
title_fullStr | Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach |
title_short | Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach |
title_sort | delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced r&d costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10320864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00590-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendersonraymondh deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT frenchdeclan deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT stewartelaine deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT smartdave deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT idicaadam deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT redmondsandra deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT ecksteinmarkus deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT clarkjordan deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT sullivanrichard deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT keelingpeter deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach AT lawlermark deliveringtheprecisiononcologyparadigmreducedrdcostsandgreaterreturnoninvestmentthroughacompaniondiagnosticinformedprecisiononcologymedicinesapproach |