Cargando…

Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral injury is a common sports injury, and hyaline cartilage does not regenerate spontaneously when injured. However, there is currently no gold standard for treating osteochondral defects. Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is widely used in clinical practice and is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Rongmao, Wang, Gang, Chen, Zhian, Yuan, Libo, Zhou, Tianhua, Tan, Hongbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03964-6
_version_ 1785068550153568256
author Shi, Rongmao
Wang, Gang
Chen, Zhian
Yuan, Libo
Zhou, Tianhua
Tan, Hongbo
author_facet Shi, Rongmao
Wang, Gang
Chen, Zhian
Yuan, Libo
Zhou, Tianhua
Tan, Hongbo
author_sort Shi, Rongmao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Osteochondral injury is a common sports injury, and hyaline cartilage does not regenerate spontaneously when injured. However, there is currently no gold standard for treating osteochondral defects. Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is widely used in clinical practice and is best used to treat small osteochondral lesions in the knee that are < 2 cm(2) in size. Autologous dual-tissue transplantation (ADTT) is a promising method with wider indications for osteochondral injuries; however, ADTT has not been evaluated in many studies. This study aimed to compare the radiographic and histological results of ADTT and OAT for treating osteochondral defects in a porcine model. METHODS: Osteochondral defects were made in the bilateral medial condyles of the knees of 12 Dian-nan small-ear pigs. The 24 knees were divided into the ADTT group (n = 8), OAT group (n = 8), and empty control group (n = 8). At 2 and 4 months postoperatively, the knees underwent gross evaluation based on the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score, radiographic assessment based on CT findings and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score, and histological evaluation based on the O'Driscoll histological score of the repair tissue. RESULTS: At 2 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score were significantly better in the OAT group than the ADTT group (all P < 0.05). At 4 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score tended to be better in the OAT group than the ADTT group, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, ADTT and OAT are both effective treatments for osteochondral defects in weight bearing areas. ADTT may be useful as an alternative procedure to OAT for treating osteochondral defects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03964-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10321008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103210082023-07-06 Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study Shi, Rongmao Wang, Gang Chen, Zhian Yuan, Libo Zhou, Tianhua Tan, Hongbo J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Osteochondral injury is a common sports injury, and hyaline cartilage does not regenerate spontaneously when injured. However, there is currently no gold standard for treating osteochondral defects. Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is widely used in clinical practice and is best used to treat small osteochondral lesions in the knee that are < 2 cm(2) in size. Autologous dual-tissue transplantation (ADTT) is a promising method with wider indications for osteochondral injuries; however, ADTT has not been evaluated in many studies. This study aimed to compare the radiographic and histological results of ADTT and OAT for treating osteochondral defects in a porcine model. METHODS: Osteochondral defects were made in the bilateral medial condyles of the knees of 12 Dian-nan small-ear pigs. The 24 knees were divided into the ADTT group (n = 8), OAT group (n = 8), and empty control group (n = 8). At 2 and 4 months postoperatively, the knees underwent gross evaluation based on the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score, radiographic assessment based on CT findings and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score, and histological evaluation based on the O'Driscoll histological score of the repair tissue. RESULTS: At 2 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score were significantly better in the OAT group than the ADTT group (all P < 0.05). At 4 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score tended to be better in the OAT group than the ADTT group, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, ADTT and OAT are both effective treatments for osteochondral defects in weight bearing areas. ADTT may be useful as an alternative procedure to OAT for treating osteochondral defects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03964-6. BioMed Central 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10321008/ /pubmed/37403163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03964-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shi, Rongmao
Wang, Gang
Chen, Zhian
Yuan, Libo
Zhou, Tianhua
Tan, Hongbo
Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study
title Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study
title_full Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study
title_fullStr Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study
title_full_unstemmed Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study
title_short Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study
title_sort dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03964-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shirongmao dualtissuetransplantationversusosteochondralautografttransplantationinthetreatmentofosteochondraldefectsaporcinemodelstudy
AT wanggang dualtissuetransplantationversusosteochondralautografttransplantationinthetreatmentofosteochondraldefectsaporcinemodelstudy
AT chenzhian dualtissuetransplantationversusosteochondralautografttransplantationinthetreatmentofosteochondraldefectsaporcinemodelstudy
AT yuanlibo dualtissuetransplantationversusosteochondralautografttransplantationinthetreatmentofosteochondraldefectsaporcinemodelstudy
AT zhoutianhua dualtissuetransplantationversusosteochondralautografttransplantationinthetreatmentofosteochondraldefectsaporcinemodelstudy
AT tanhongbo dualtissuetransplantationversusosteochondralautografttransplantationinthetreatmentofosteochondraldefectsaporcinemodelstudy