Cargando…

Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?

Post-mortem imaging for the investigation of perinatal deaths is an acceptable tool amongst parents and religious groups, enabling a less invasive autopsy examination. Nevertheless, availability is scarce nationwide, and there is some debate amongst radiologists regarding the best practice and optim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shelmerdine, Susan C, Arthurs, Owen J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211078
_version_ 1785068588539838464
author Shelmerdine, Susan C
Arthurs, Owen J
author_facet Shelmerdine, Susan C
Arthurs, Owen J
author_sort Shelmerdine, Susan C
collection PubMed
description Post-mortem imaging for the investigation of perinatal deaths is an acceptable tool amongst parents and religious groups, enabling a less invasive autopsy examination. Nevertheless, availability is scarce nationwide, and there is some debate amongst radiologists regarding the best practice and optimal protocols for performing such studies. Much of the published literature to date focusses on single centre experiences or interesting case reports. Diagnostic accuracy studies are available for a variety of individual imaging modalities (e.g. post-mortem CT, MRI, ultrasound and micro-CT), however, assimilating this information is important when attempting to start a local service. In this article, we present a comprehensive review summarising the latest research, recently published international guidelines, and describe which imaging modalities are best suited for specific indications. When the antenatal clinical findings are not supported by the post-mortem imaging, we also suggest how and when an invasive autopsy may be considered. In general, a collaborative working relationship within a multidisciplinary team (consisting of radiologists, radiographers, the local pathology department, mortuary staff, foetal medicine specialists, obstetricians and bereavement midwives) is vital for a successful service.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10321257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103212572023-07-06 Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? Shelmerdine, Susan C Arthurs, Owen J Br J Radiol Prenatal Imaging Advances: Physiology and Function to Motion Correction and Ai: Review Article Post-mortem imaging for the investigation of perinatal deaths is an acceptable tool amongst parents and religious groups, enabling a less invasive autopsy examination. Nevertheless, availability is scarce nationwide, and there is some debate amongst radiologists regarding the best practice and optimal protocols for performing such studies. Much of the published literature to date focusses on single centre experiences or interesting case reports. Diagnostic accuracy studies are available for a variety of individual imaging modalities (e.g. post-mortem CT, MRI, ultrasound and micro-CT), however, assimilating this information is important when attempting to start a local service. In this article, we present a comprehensive review summarising the latest research, recently published international guidelines, and describe which imaging modalities are best suited for specific indications. When the antenatal clinical findings are not supported by the post-mortem imaging, we also suggest how and when an invasive autopsy may be considered. In general, a collaborative working relationship within a multidisciplinary team (consisting of radiologists, radiographers, the local pathology department, mortuary staff, foetal medicine specialists, obstetricians and bereavement midwives) is vital for a successful service. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-07-01 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10321257/ /pubmed/35451852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211078 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Prenatal Imaging Advances: Physiology and Function to Motion Correction and Ai: Review Article
Shelmerdine, Susan C
Arthurs, Owen J
Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
title Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
title_full Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
title_fullStr Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
title_short Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
title_sort post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
topic Prenatal Imaging Advances: Physiology and Function to Motion Correction and Ai: Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211078
work_keys_str_mv AT shelmerdinesusanc postmortemperinatalimagingwhatistheevidence
AT arthursowenj postmortemperinatalimagingwhatistheevidence