Cargando…
Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?
Post-mortem imaging for the investigation of perinatal deaths is an acceptable tool amongst parents and religious groups, enabling a less invasive autopsy examination. Nevertheless, availability is scarce nationwide, and there is some debate amongst radiologists regarding the best practice and optim...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211078 |
_version_ | 1785068588539838464 |
---|---|
author | Shelmerdine, Susan C Arthurs, Owen J |
author_facet | Shelmerdine, Susan C Arthurs, Owen J |
author_sort | Shelmerdine, Susan C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post-mortem imaging for the investigation of perinatal deaths is an acceptable tool amongst parents and religious groups, enabling a less invasive autopsy examination. Nevertheless, availability is scarce nationwide, and there is some debate amongst radiologists regarding the best practice and optimal protocols for performing such studies. Much of the published literature to date focusses on single centre experiences or interesting case reports. Diagnostic accuracy studies are available for a variety of individual imaging modalities (e.g. post-mortem CT, MRI, ultrasound and micro-CT), however, assimilating this information is important when attempting to start a local service. In this article, we present a comprehensive review summarising the latest research, recently published international guidelines, and describe which imaging modalities are best suited for specific indications. When the antenatal clinical findings are not supported by the post-mortem imaging, we also suggest how and when an invasive autopsy may be considered. In general, a collaborative working relationship within a multidisciplinary team (consisting of radiologists, radiographers, the local pathology department, mortuary staff, foetal medicine specialists, obstetricians and bereavement midwives) is vital for a successful service. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10321257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103212572023-07-06 Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? Shelmerdine, Susan C Arthurs, Owen J Br J Radiol Prenatal Imaging Advances: Physiology and Function to Motion Correction and Ai: Review Article Post-mortem imaging for the investigation of perinatal deaths is an acceptable tool amongst parents and religious groups, enabling a less invasive autopsy examination. Nevertheless, availability is scarce nationwide, and there is some debate amongst radiologists regarding the best practice and optimal protocols for performing such studies. Much of the published literature to date focusses on single centre experiences or interesting case reports. Diagnostic accuracy studies are available for a variety of individual imaging modalities (e.g. post-mortem CT, MRI, ultrasound and micro-CT), however, assimilating this information is important when attempting to start a local service. In this article, we present a comprehensive review summarising the latest research, recently published international guidelines, and describe which imaging modalities are best suited for specific indications. When the antenatal clinical findings are not supported by the post-mortem imaging, we also suggest how and when an invasive autopsy may be considered. In general, a collaborative working relationship within a multidisciplinary team (consisting of radiologists, radiographers, the local pathology department, mortuary staff, foetal medicine specialists, obstetricians and bereavement midwives) is vital for a successful service. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-07-01 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10321257/ /pubmed/35451852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211078 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Prenatal Imaging Advances: Physiology and Function to Motion Correction and Ai: Review Article Shelmerdine, Susan C Arthurs, Owen J Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? |
title | Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? |
title_full | Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? |
title_fullStr | Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? |
title_short | Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? |
title_sort | post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence? |
topic | Prenatal Imaging Advances: Physiology and Function to Motion Correction and Ai: Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shelmerdinesusanc postmortemperinatalimagingwhatistheevidence AT arthursowenj postmortemperinatalimagingwhatistheevidence |