Cargando…
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. BACKGROUND: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36205129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709 |
_version_ | 1785068629247655936 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Benedict R. H. Machin, Matthew Jasionowska, Sara Salim, Safa Onida, Sarah Shalhoub, Joseph Davies, Alun H. |
author_facet | Turner, Benedict R. H. Machin, Matthew Jasionowska, Sara Salim, Safa Onida, Sarah Shalhoub, Joseph Davies, Alun H. |
author_sort | Turner, Benedict R. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. BACKGROUND: The VTE rate after endovenous procedures for varicose veins is higher than other day-case procedures and could be reduced with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines with a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42021274963). Studies of endovenous intervention for superficial venous incompetence reporting the predefined outcomes with at least 30 patients were eligible. Data were pooled with a fixed effects model. RESULTS: There were 221 trials included in the review (47 randomized trial arms, 105 prospective cohort studies, and 69 retrospective studies). In randomized trial arms, the rate of deep venous thrombosis with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.23%–1.19%) (9 studies, 1095 patients, 2 events) versus 2.26% (95% CI, 1.81%–2.82%) (38 studies, 6951 patients, 69 events) with mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The rate of pulmonary embolism in randomized trial arms with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.09–2.35) (5 studies, 460 participants, 1 event) versus 0.23% (95% CI, 0.1%–0.52%) (28 studies, 4834 participants, 3 events) for mechanical measures alone. The rate of EHIT grade III to IV was 0.35% (95% CI, 0.09–1.40) versus 0.88% (95% CI, 0.28%–2.70%). There was 1 VTE-related mortality and 1 instance of major bleeding, with low rates of minor bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant reduction in the rate of DVT with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and routine prescription of anticoagulation after endovenous varicose vein intervention should be considered. VTE risk for individual study participants is heterogeneous and risk stratification in future randomized interventional studies is critical to establish the clinical effectiveness and safety of additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10321513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103215132023-07-06 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions Turner, Benedict R. H. Machin, Matthew Jasionowska, Sara Salim, Safa Onida, Sarah Shalhoub, Joseph Davies, Alun H. Ann Surg Meta-Analysis The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. BACKGROUND: The VTE rate after endovenous procedures for varicose veins is higher than other day-case procedures and could be reduced with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines with a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42021274963). Studies of endovenous intervention for superficial venous incompetence reporting the predefined outcomes with at least 30 patients were eligible. Data were pooled with a fixed effects model. RESULTS: There were 221 trials included in the review (47 randomized trial arms, 105 prospective cohort studies, and 69 retrospective studies). In randomized trial arms, the rate of deep venous thrombosis with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.23%–1.19%) (9 studies, 1095 patients, 2 events) versus 2.26% (95% CI, 1.81%–2.82%) (38 studies, 6951 patients, 69 events) with mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The rate of pulmonary embolism in randomized trial arms with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.09–2.35) (5 studies, 460 participants, 1 event) versus 0.23% (95% CI, 0.1%–0.52%) (28 studies, 4834 participants, 3 events) for mechanical measures alone. The rate of EHIT grade III to IV was 0.35% (95% CI, 0.09–1.40) versus 0.88% (95% CI, 0.28%–2.70%). There was 1 VTE-related mortality and 1 instance of major bleeding, with low rates of minor bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant reduction in the rate of DVT with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and routine prescription of anticoagulation after endovenous varicose vein intervention should be considered. VTE risk for individual study participants is heterogeneous and risk stratification in future randomized interventional studies is critical to establish the clinical effectiveness and safety of additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10321513/ /pubmed/36205129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Turner, Benedict R. H. Machin, Matthew Jasionowska, Sara Salim, Safa Onida, Sarah Shalhoub, Joseph Davies, Alun H. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions |
title | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions |
title_full | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions |
title_short | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of the additional benefit of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for endovenous varicose vein interventions |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36205129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnerbenedictrh systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheadditionalbenefitofpharmacologicalthromboprophylaxisforendovenousvaricoseveininterventions AT machinmatthew systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheadditionalbenefitofpharmacologicalthromboprophylaxisforendovenousvaricoseveininterventions AT jasionowskasara systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheadditionalbenefitofpharmacologicalthromboprophylaxisforendovenousvaricoseveininterventions AT salimsafa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheadditionalbenefitofpharmacologicalthromboprophylaxisforendovenousvaricoseveininterventions AT onidasarah systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheadditionalbenefitofpharmacologicalthromboprophylaxisforendovenousvaricoseveininterventions AT shalhoubjoseph systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheadditionalbenefitofpharmacologicalthromboprophylaxisforendovenousvaricoseveininterventions AT daviesalunh systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheadditionalbenefitofpharmacologicalthromboprophylaxisforendovenousvaricoseveininterventions |