Cargando…

Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics

Quantification of a researcher's productivity relies on objective bibliometric measurements, such as the Hirsch index (h-index). However, h-index is not field and time-normalized and possesses bias against newer researchers. Our study is the first to compare the relative citation ratio (RCR), a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herzog, Isabel, Mendiratta, Dhruv, Liggio, Daniel F., Ahn, David B., Vosbikian, Michael, Kaushal, Neil K., Chu, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37406178
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00080
_version_ 1785068664557404160
author Herzog, Isabel
Mendiratta, Dhruv
Liggio, Daniel F.
Ahn, David B.
Vosbikian, Michael
Kaushal, Neil K.
Chu, Alice
author_facet Herzog, Isabel
Mendiratta, Dhruv
Liggio, Daniel F.
Ahn, David B.
Vosbikian, Michael
Kaushal, Neil K.
Chu, Alice
author_sort Herzog, Isabel
collection PubMed
description Quantification of a researcher's productivity relies on objective bibliometric measurements, such as the Hirsch index (h-index). However, h-index is not field and time-normalized and possesses bias against newer researchers. Our study is the first to compare the relative citation ratio (RCR), a new article-level metric developed by the National Institutes of Health, with h-index in academic orthopaedics. METHODS: Academic orthopaedic programs in the United States were identified using the 2022 Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Available demographic and training data for surgeons were collected. RCR was calculated using the National Institutes of Health iCite tool, and h-index was calculated using Scopus. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred twelve academic orthopaedic surgeons were identified from 131 residency programs. H-index, weighted RCR (w-RCR), and mean RCR (m-RCR) all significantly differed by faculty rank and career duration. However, while h-index and w-RCR varied between sexes (P < 0.001), m-RCR did not (P = 0.066), despite men having a longer career duration (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We propose that m-RCR be used in conjunction with w-RCR or h-index to promote a fairer, comprehensive depiction of an orthopaedic surgeon's academic effect and productivity. Use of m-RCR may reduce the historic bias against women and younger surgeons in orthopaedics, which has implications in employment, promotion, and tenure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10321680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103216802023-07-06 Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics Herzog, Isabel Mendiratta, Dhruv Liggio, Daniel F. Ahn, David B. Vosbikian, Michael Kaushal, Neil K. Chu, Alice J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Quantification of a researcher's productivity relies on objective bibliometric measurements, such as the Hirsch index (h-index). However, h-index is not field and time-normalized and possesses bias against newer researchers. Our study is the first to compare the relative citation ratio (RCR), a new article-level metric developed by the National Institutes of Health, with h-index in academic orthopaedics. METHODS: Academic orthopaedic programs in the United States were identified using the 2022 Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Available demographic and training data for surgeons were collected. RCR was calculated using the National Institutes of Health iCite tool, and h-index was calculated using Scopus. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred twelve academic orthopaedic surgeons were identified from 131 residency programs. H-index, weighted RCR (w-RCR), and mean RCR (m-RCR) all significantly differed by faculty rank and career duration. However, while h-index and w-RCR varied between sexes (P < 0.001), m-RCR did not (P = 0.066), despite men having a longer career duration (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: We propose that m-RCR be used in conjunction with w-RCR or h-index to promote a fairer, comprehensive depiction of an orthopaedic surgeon's academic effect and productivity. Use of m-RCR may reduce the historic bias against women and younger surgeons in orthopaedics, which has implications in employment, promotion, and tenure. Wolters Kluwer 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10321680/ /pubmed/37406178 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00080 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Herzog, Isabel
Mendiratta, Dhruv
Liggio, Daniel F.
Ahn, David B.
Vosbikian, Michael
Kaushal, Neil K.
Chu, Alice
Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics
title Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics
title_full Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics
title_fullStr Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics
title_full_unstemmed Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics
title_short Use of the Relative Citation Ratio in Conjunction With H-Index to Promote Equity in Academic Orthopaedics
title_sort use of the relative citation ratio in conjunction with h-index to promote equity in academic orthopaedics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37406178
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00080
work_keys_str_mv AT herzogisabel useoftherelativecitationratioinconjunctionwithhindextopromoteequityinacademicorthopaedics
AT mendirattadhruv useoftherelativecitationratioinconjunctionwithhindextopromoteequityinacademicorthopaedics
AT liggiodanielf useoftherelativecitationratioinconjunctionwithhindextopromoteequityinacademicorthopaedics
AT ahndavidb useoftherelativecitationratioinconjunctionwithhindextopromoteequityinacademicorthopaedics
AT vosbikianmichael useoftherelativecitationratioinconjunctionwithhindextopromoteequityinacademicorthopaedics
AT kaushalneilk useoftherelativecitationratioinconjunctionwithhindextopromoteequityinacademicorthopaedics
AT chualice useoftherelativecitationratioinconjunctionwithhindextopromoteequityinacademicorthopaedics