Cargando…
Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction
BACKGROUND: ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biomech...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
NASMI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415672 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.77362 |
_version_ | 1785068683573329920 |
---|---|
author | Singleton, Steven Scofield, Harrison Davis, Brittany Waller, Alexandra Garrison, Craig Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph |
author_facet | Singleton, Steven Scofield, Harrison Davis, Brittany Waller, Alexandra Garrison, Craig Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph |
author_sort | Singleton, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biomechanics and decrease in osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in metrics of knee joint loading during a single limb squat task between individuals following a primary ACL-r versus those who underwent a standard ACL-R with a patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. STUDY TYPE: Case Control Study METHODS: The ACL-r group [n: 15, age(yrs): 38.8±13.9] sustained a proximal ACL disruption that was amenable to repair, while the ACL-R group [n: 15, age(yrs): 25.60±1.7] underwent primary reconstruction with patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. At 12-weeks post-operation, both groups completed the IKDC questionnaire and biomechanical testing during performance of the single limb squat. Bilateral peak knee extension moment and total knee joint power as a measure of eccentric loading (contraction) during the descent phase of the squat were calculated on the surgical and non-surgical limb and averaged across the middle three of five trials. Participants also completed quadriceps strength testing on both limbs three months after surgery on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec. LSI (Limb Strength Index) was calculated for all variables. Separate ANCOVAs were performed on each biomechanical variable to examine differences between groups. RESULTS: The ACL-r had a significantly greater peak knee extension moment LSI (ACL-r: 78.46±5.79%; ACL-R: 56.86±5.79%; p=0.019, ηp2=.186) and total knee joint power LSI (ACL-r: 72.47±7.39%; ACL-R: 39.70±7.39%, p=0.006, ηp2=.245) than the ACL-R group. The ACL-r also had a significantly greater quadriceps LSI than the ACL-R group (ACL-r: 66.318±4.61%, ACL-R: 48.03±4.61%, p=0.013, ηp2=.206). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals following ACL-r demonstrate increased knee joint loading symmetry during a single leg squat task and greater quadriceps strength symmetry at 12 weeks post-surgery compared to those who underwent ACL-R. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10321778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | NASMI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103217782023-07-06 Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction Singleton, Steven Scofield, Harrison Davis, Brittany Waller, Alexandra Garrison, Craig Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph Int J Sports Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biomechanics and decrease in osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in metrics of knee joint loading during a single limb squat task between individuals following a primary ACL-r versus those who underwent a standard ACL-R with a patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. STUDY TYPE: Case Control Study METHODS: The ACL-r group [n: 15, age(yrs): 38.8±13.9] sustained a proximal ACL disruption that was amenable to repair, while the ACL-R group [n: 15, age(yrs): 25.60±1.7] underwent primary reconstruction with patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. At 12-weeks post-operation, both groups completed the IKDC questionnaire and biomechanical testing during performance of the single limb squat. Bilateral peak knee extension moment and total knee joint power as a measure of eccentric loading (contraction) during the descent phase of the squat were calculated on the surgical and non-surgical limb and averaged across the middle three of five trials. Participants also completed quadriceps strength testing on both limbs three months after surgery on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec. LSI (Limb Strength Index) was calculated for all variables. Separate ANCOVAs were performed on each biomechanical variable to examine differences between groups. RESULTS: The ACL-r had a significantly greater peak knee extension moment LSI (ACL-r: 78.46±5.79%; ACL-R: 56.86±5.79%; p=0.019, ηp2=.186) and total knee joint power LSI (ACL-r: 72.47±7.39%; ACL-R: 39.70±7.39%, p=0.006, ηp2=.245) than the ACL-R group. The ACL-r also had a significantly greater quadriceps LSI than the ACL-R group (ACL-r: 66.318±4.61%, ACL-R: 48.03±4.61%, p=0.013, ηp2=.206). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals following ACL-r demonstrate increased knee joint loading symmetry during a single leg squat task and greater quadriceps strength symmetry at 12 weeks post-surgery compared to those who underwent ACL-R. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 NASMI 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10321778/ /pubmed/37415672 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.77362 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Singleton, Steven Scofield, Harrison Davis, Brittany Waller, Alexandra Garrison, Craig Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction |
title | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL
Reconstruction |
title_full | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL
Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL
Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL
Reconstruction |
title_short | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL
Reconstruction |
title_sort | altered knee loading following primary acl repair versus acl
reconstruction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415672 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.77362 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singletonsteven alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT scofieldharrison alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT davisbrittany alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT walleralexandra alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT garrisoncraig alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT gotoshiho alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT hannonjoseph alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction |