Cargando…

Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up

AIMS: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. METHODS: In this case-control study,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jørgensen, Peter B., Jakobsen, Stig S., Vainorius, Dovydas, Homilius, Morten, Hansen, Torben B., Stilling, Maiken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1
_version_ 1785068706583281664
author Jørgensen, Peter B.
Jakobsen, Stig S.
Vainorius, Dovydas
Homilius, Morten
Hansen, Torben B.
Stilling, Maiken
author_facet Jørgensen, Peter B.
Jakobsen, Stig S.
Vainorius, Dovydas
Homilius, Morten
Hansen, Torben B.
Stilling, Maiken
author_sort Jørgensen, Peter B.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. METHODS: In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up. RESULTS: At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness. CONCLUSION: The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):507–515.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10322230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103222302023-07-06 Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up Jørgensen, Peter B. Jakobsen, Stig S. Vainorius, Dovydas Homilius, Morten Hansen, Torben B. Stilling, Maiken Bone Jt Open Hip AIMS: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. METHODS: In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up. RESULTS: At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness. CONCLUSION: The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):507–515. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10322230/ /pubmed/37407021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1 Text en © 2023 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDMThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Hip
Jørgensen, Peter B.
Jakobsen, Stig S.
Vainorius, Dovydas
Homilius, Morten
Hansen, Torben B.
Stilling, Maiken
Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_full Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_fullStr Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_short Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
title_sort less early subsidence of cemented exeter short stems compared with cemented exeter standard stems in dorr type a femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT jørgensenpeterb lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT jakobsenstigs lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT vainoriusdovydas lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT homiliusmorten lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT hansentorbenb lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup
AT stillingmaiken lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup