Cargando…
Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up
AIMS: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. METHODS: In this case-control study,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1 |
_version_ | 1785068706583281664 |
---|---|
author | Jørgensen, Peter B. Jakobsen, Stig S. Vainorius, Dovydas Homilius, Morten Hansen, Torben B. Stilling, Maiken |
author_facet | Jørgensen, Peter B. Jakobsen, Stig S. Vainorius, Dovydas Homilius, Morten Hansen, Torben B. Stilling, Maiken |
author_sort | Jørgensen, Peter B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. METHODS: In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up. RESULTS: At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness. CONCLUSION: The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):507–515. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10322230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103222302023-07-06 Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up Jørgensen, Peter B. Jakobsen, Stig S. Vainorius, Dovydas Homilius, Morten Hansen, Torben B. Stilling, Maiken Bone Jt Open Hip AIMS: The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems. METHODS: In this case-control study, 25 patients (22 female) at mean age of 78 years (70 to 89) received cemented Exeter short stem (case group). Cases were selected based on Dorr type A femora and matched first by Dorr type A and then age to a control cohort of 21 patients (11 female) at mean age of 74 years (70 to 89) who received with cemented Exeter standard stems (control group). Preoperatively, all patients had primary hip osteoarthritis and no osteoporosis as confirmed by dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning. Patients were followed with radiostereometry for evaluation of stem migration (primary endpoint), evaluation of cement quality, and Oxford Hip Score. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at three, 12, and 24 months and a minimum five-year follow-up. RESULTS: At three months, subsidence of the short stem -0.87 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to -0.67) was lower compared to the standard stem -1.59 mm (95% CI -1.82 to -1.36; p < 0.001). Both stems continued a similar pattern of subsidence until five-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up, the short stem had subsided mean -1.67 mm (95% CI -1.98 to -1.36) compared to mean -2.67 mm (95% CI -3.03 to -2.32) for the standard stem (p < 0.001). Subsidence was not influenced by preoperative bone quality (osteopenia vs normal) or cement mantle thickness. CONCLUSION: The standard Exeter stem had more early subsidence compared with the short Exeter stem in patients with Dorr type A femora, but thereafter a similar migration pattern of subsidence until minimum five years follow-up. Both the standard and the short Exeter stems subside. The standard stem subsides more compared to the short stem in Dorr type A femurs. Subsidence of the Exeter stems was not affected by cement mantle thickness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):507–515. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10322230/ /pubmed/37407021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1 Text en © 2023 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDMThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Hip Jørgensen, Peter B. Jakobsen, Stig S. Vainorius, Dovydas Homilius, Morten Hansen, Torben B. Stilling, Maiken Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up |
title | Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up |
title_full | Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up |
title_fullStr | Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up |
title_short | Less early subsidence of cemented Exeter short stems compared with cemented Exeter standard stems in Dorr type A femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up |
title_sort | less early subsidence of cemented exeter short stems compared with cemented exeter standard stems in dorr type a femurs: a radiostereometry study with minimum five years’ follow-up |
topic | Hip |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.47.BJO-2023-0008.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jørgensenpeterb lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup AT jakobsenstigs lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup AT vainoriusdovydas lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup AT homiliusmorten lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup AT hansentorbenb lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup AT stillingmaiken lessearlysubsidenceofcementedexetershortstemscomparedwithcementedexeterstandardstemsindorrtypeafemursaradiostereometrystudywithminimumfiveyearsfollowup |