Cargando…
Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The most common functional complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is the delayed emptying of the gastric conduit (DGCE) for which several diagnostic tools are available, e.g. chest X-ray, upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and water-soluble contrast radiogram. Howeve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09714-9 |
_version_ | 1785068829425008640 |
---|---|
author | Brunner, Stefanie Lorenz, Florian Dratsch, Thomas Schröder, Lorenz Toex, Ulrich Babic, Benjamin Fuchs, Hans Friedrich Schmidt, Thomas Bruns, Christiane Josephine Goeser, Tobias Chon, Seung-Hun |
author_facet | Brunner, Stefanie Lorenz, Florian Dratsch, Thomas Schröder, Lorenz Toex, Ulrich Babic, Benjamin Fuchs, Hans Friedrich Schmidt, Thomas Bruns, Christiane Josephine Goeser, Tobias Chon, Seung-Hun |
author_sort | Brunner, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The most common functional complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is the delayed emptying of the gastric conduit (DGCE) for which several diagnostic tools are available, e.g. chest X-ray, upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and water-soluble contrast radiogram. However, none of these diagnostic tools evaluate the pylorus itself. Our study demonstrates the successful measurement of pyloric distensibility in patients with DGCE after esophagectomy and in those without it. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Between May 2021 and October 2021, we performed a retrospective single-centre study of all patients who had an oncological Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and underwent our post-surgery follow-up programme with surveillance endoscopies and computed tomography scans. EndoFlip™ was used to perform measurements of the pylorus under endoscopic control, and distensibility was measured at 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml balloon filling. RESULTS: We included 70 patients, and EndoFlip™ measurement was feasible in all patients. Successful application of EndoFlip™ was achieved in all interventions (n = 70, 100%). 51 patients showed a normal postoperative course, whereas 19 patients suffered from DGCE. Distensibility proved to be smaller in patients with symptoms of DGCE compared to asymptomatic patients. For 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml, the mean distensibility was 6.4 vs 10.1, 5.7 vs 7.9 and 4.5 vs 6.3 mm(2)/mmHg. The differences were significant for all three balloon fillings. No severe EndoFlip™ treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Measurement with EndoFlip™ is a safe and technically feasible endoscopic option for measuring the distensibility of the pylorus. Our study shows that the distensibility in asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy is significantly higher than that in patients suffering from DGCE. However, more studies need to be conducted to demonstrate the general use of EndoFlip™ measurement of the pylorus after esophagectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10322758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103227582023-07-07 Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe Brunner, Stefanie Lorenz, Florian Dratsch, Thomas Schröder, Lorenz Toex, Ulrich Babic, Benjamin Fuchs, Hans Friedrich Schmidt, Thomas Bruns, Christiane Josephine Goeser, Tobias Chon, Seung-Hun Surg Endosc 2022 SAGES Oral OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The most common functional complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is the delayed emptying of the gastric conduit (DGCE) for which several diagnostic tools are available, e.g. chest X-ray, upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and water-soluble contrast radiogram. However, none of these diagnostic tools evaluate the pylorus itself. Our study demonstrates the successful measurement of pyloric distensibility in patients with DGCE after esophagectomy and in those without it. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Between May 2021 and October 2021, we performed a retrospective single-centre study of all patients who had an oncological Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and underwent our post-surgery follow-up programme with surveillance endoscopies and computed tomography scans. EndoFlip™ was used to perform measurements of the pylorus under endoscopic control, and distensibility was measured at 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml balloon filling. RESULTS: We included 70 patients, and EndoFlip™ measurement was feasible in all patients. Successful application of EndoFlip™ was achieved in all interventions (n = 70, 100%). 51 patients showed a normal postoperative course, whereas 19 patients suffered from DGCE. Distensibility proved to be smaller in patients with symptoms of DGCE compared to asymptomatic patients. For 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml, the mean distensibility was 6.4 vs 10.1, 5.7 vs 7.9 and 4.5 vs 6.3 mm(2)/mmHg. The differences were significant for all three balloon fillings. No severe EndoFlip™ treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Measurement with EndoFlip™ is a safe and technically feasible endoscopic option for measuring the distensibility of the pylorus. Our study shows that the distensibility in asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy is significantly higher than that in patients suffering from DGCE. However, more studies need to be conducted to demonstrate the general use of EndoFlip™ measurement of the pylorus after esophagectomy. Springer US 2022-12-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10322758/ /pubmed/36454290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09714-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | 2022 SAGES Oral Brunner, Stefanie Lorenz, Florian Dratsch, Thomas Schröder, Lorenz Toex, Ulrich Babic, Benjamin Fuchs, Hans Friedrich Schmidt, Thomas Bruns, Christiane Josephine Goeser, Tobias Chon, Seung-Hun Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe |
title | Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe |
title_full | Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe |
title_fullStr | Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe |
title_short | Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe |
title_sort | assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after ivor-lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe |
topic | 2022 SAGES Oral |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09714-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunnerstefanie assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT lorenzflorian assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT dratschthomas assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT schroderlorenz assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT toexulrich assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT babicbenjamin assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT fuchshansfriedrich assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT schmidtthomas assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT brunschristianejosephine assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT goesertobias assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe AT chonseunghun assessmentofpyloricsphincterphysiologyafterivorlewisesophagectomyusinganendoluminalfunctionallumenimagingprobe |