Cargando…

Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis

BACKGROUND: Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Chae Yun, Veerapong, Jula, Baumgartner, Joel M., Murphy, James D., Lowy, Andrew M., Kelly, Kaitlyn J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09589-w
_version_ 1785068830363484160
author Cho, Chae Yun
Veerapong, Jula
Baumgartner, Joel M.
Murphy, James D.
Lowy, Andrew M.
Kelly, Kaitlyn J.
author_facet Cho, Chae Yun
Veerapong, Jula
Baumgartner, Joel M.
Murphy, James D.
Lowy, Andrew M.
Kelly, Kaitlyn J.
author_sort Cho, Chae Yun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a single institution prospective clinical trial and comparative study using historical controls. Patients with histologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or primary peritoneal origin, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) [Formula: see text] 10 were eligible. RESULTS: Clinical trial: 18 patients (median age 57 years, 39% female) with appendiceal (15) or colorectal (3) primary PSM underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. Median and range outcomes were: operative time 219 min (134–378), EBL 10 mL (0–100), time to return to bowel function 3 days (1–7), duration IV narcotic use 3 days (1–8), length of stay 6 days (3–11). All patients had a complete cytoreduction (CC-score 0). Three (17%) experienced minor morbidity, with no major morbidity or mortality. Median DFS and OS were not reached with median follow-up of 48 months. Comparative analysis: Laparoscopic approach associated with reduced time to return of bowel function (3 versus 4 days, p = 0.001), length of stay (8 versus 5 days, p < 0.001), and morbidity (16% versus 42%, p = 0.008). Independent predictors of DFS included prior chemotherapy (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.85, 13.89; p = 0.002), and CC-score > 0 (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19, 9.41; p = 0.025), but not surgical approach. CC-score > 0 was the only independent predictor of OS (HR 10.12, 95% CI 2.16, 47.30, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC should be considered for patients with PSM with low-volume disease, including those with adenocarcinoma histology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02463877.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10322763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103227632023-07-07 Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis Cho, Chae Yun Veerapong, Jula Baumgartner, Joel M. Murphy, James D. Lowy, Andrew M. Kelly, Kaitlyn J. Surg Endosc 2022 SAGES Oral BACKGROUND: Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a single institution prospective clinical trial and comparative study using historical controls. Patients with histologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or primary peritoneal origin, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) [Formula: see text] 10 were eligible. RESULTS: Clinical trial: 18 patients (median age 57 years, 39% female) with appendiceal (15) or colorectal (3) primary PSM underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. Median and range outcomes were: operative time 219 min (134–378), EBL 10 mL (0–100), time to return to bowel function 3 days (1–7), duration IV narcotic use 3 days (1–8), length of stay 6 days (3–11). All patients had a complete cytoreduction (CC-score 0). Three (17%) experienced minor morbidity, with no major morbidity or mortality. Median DFS and OS were not reached with median follow-up of 48 months. Comparative analysis: Laparoscopic approach associated with reduced time to return of bowel function (3 versus 4 days, p = 0.001), length of stay (8 versus 5 days, p < 0.001), and morbidity (16% versus 42%, p = 0.008). Independent predictors of DFS included prior chemotherapy (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.85, 13.89; p = 0.002), and CC-score > 0 (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19, 9.41; p = 0.025), but not surgical approach. CC-score > 0 was the only independent predictor of OS (HR 10.12, 95% CI 2.16, 47.30, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC should be considered for patients with PSM with low-volume disease, including those with adenocarcinoma histology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02463877. Springer US 2022-12-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10322763/ /pubmed/36477643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09589-w Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle 2022 SAGES Oral
Cho, Chae Yun
Veerapong, Jula
Baumgartner, Joel M.
Murphy, James D.
Lowy, Andrew M.
Kelly, Kaitlyn J.
Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
title Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
title_full Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
title_short Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
title_sort laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
topic 2022 SAGES Oral
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09589-w
work_keys_str_mv AT chochaeyun laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis
AT veerapongjula laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis
AT baumgartnerjoelm laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis
AT murphyjamesd laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis
AT lowyandrewm laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis
AT kellykaitlynj laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis