Cargando…
Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis
BACKGROUND: Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09589-w |
_version_ | 1785068830363484160 |
---|---|
author | Cho, Chae Yun Veerapong, Jula Baumgartner, Joel M. Murphy, James D. Lowy, Andrew M. Kelly, Kaitlyn J. |
author_facet | Cho, Chae Yun Veerapong, Jula Baumgartner, Joel M. Murphy, James D. Lowy, Andrew M. Kelly, Kaitlyn J. |
author_sort | Cho, Chae Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a single institution prospective clinical trial and comparative study using historical controls. Patients with histologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or primary peritoneal origin, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) [Formula: see text] 10 were eligible. RESULTS: Clinical trial: 18 patients (median age 57 years, 39% female) with appendiceal (15) or colorectal (3) primary PSM underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. Median and range outcomes were: operative time 219 min (134–378), EBL 10 mL (0–100), time to return to bowel function 3 days (1–7), duration IV narcotic use 3 days (1–8), length of stay 6 days (3–11). All patients had a complete cytoreduction (CC-score 0). Three (17%) experienced minor morbidity, with no major morbidity or mortality. Median DFS and OS were not reached with median follow-up of 48 months. Comparative analysis: Laparoscopic approach associated with reduced time to return of bowel function (3 versus 4 days, p = 0.001), length of stay (8 versus 5 days, p < 0.001), and morbidity (16% versus 42%, p = 0.008). Independent predictors of DFS included prior chemotherapy (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.85, 13.89; p = 0.002), and CC-score > 0 (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19, 9.41; p = 0.025), but not surgical approach. CC-score > 0 was the only independent predictor of OS (HR 10.12, 95% CI 2.16, 47.30, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC should be considered for patients with PSM with low-volume disease, including those with adenocarcinoma histology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02463877. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10322763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103227632023-07-07 Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis Cho, Chae Yun Veerapong, Jula Baumgartner, Joel M. Murphy, James D. Lowy, Andrew M. Kelly, Kaitlyn J. Surg Endosc 2022 SAGES Oral BACKGROUND: Open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with high morbidity, which limits the degree to which patients may benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a single institution prospective clinical trial and comparative study using historical controls. Patients with histologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) of appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or primary peritoneal origin, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) [Formula: see text] 10 were eligible. RESULTS: Clinical trial: 18 patients (median age 57 years, 39% female) with appendiceal (15) or colorectal (3) primary PSM underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC. Median and range outcomes were: operative time 219 min (134–378), EBL 10 mL (0–100), time to return to bowel function 3 days (1–7), duration IV narcotic use 3 days (1–8), length of stay 6 days (3–11). All patients had a complete cytoreduction (CC-score 0). Three (17%) experienced minor morbidity, with no major morbidity or mortality. Median DFS and OS were not reached with median follow-up of 48 months. Comparative analysis: Laparoscopic approach associated with reduced time to return of bowel function (3 versus 4 days, p = 0.001), length of stay (8 versus 5 days, p < 0.001), and morbidity (16% versus 42%, p = 0.008). Independent predictors of DFS included prior chemotherapy (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.85, 13.89; p = 0.002), and CC-score > 0 (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19, 9.41; p = 0.025), but not surgical approach. CC-score > 0 was the only independent predictor of OS (HR 10.12, 95% CI 2.16, 47.30, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC should be considered for patients with PSM with low-volume disease, including those with adenocarcinoma histology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02463877. Springer US 2022-12-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10322763/ /pubmed/36477643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09589-w Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | 2022 SAGES Oral Cho, Chae Yun Veerapong, Jula Baumgartner, Joel M. Murphy, James D. Lowy, Andrew M. Kelly, Kaitlyn J. Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis |
title | Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis |
title_full | Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis |
title_short | Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis |
title_sort | laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective clinical trial and comparative analysis |
topic | 2022 SAGES Oral |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09589-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chochaeyun laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis AT veerapongjula laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis AT baumgartnerjoelm laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis AT murphyjamesd laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis AT lowyandrewm laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis AT kellykaitlynj laparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyaprospectiveclinicaltrialandcomparativeanalysis |