Cargando…

Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin

Compared to rifampicin (600 mg/day), standard doses of rifabutin (300 mg/day) have a lower risk of drug–drug interactions due to induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1) mediated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR). However, clinical comparisons with equal rifamycin doses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilles, Julie, Weiss, Johanna, Sauter, Max, Haefeli, Walter E., Ruez, Stephanie, Theile, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03531-2
_version_ 1785068834427764736
author Nilles, Julie
Weiss, Johanna
Sauter, Max
Haefeli, Walter E.
Ruez, Stephanie
Theile, Dirk
author_facet Nilles, Julie
Weiss, Johanna
Sauter, Max
Haefeli, Walter E.
Ruez, Stephanie
Theile, Dirk
author_sort Nilles, Julie
collection PubMed
description Compared to rifampicin (600 mg/day), standard doses of rifabutin (300 mg/day) have a lower risk of drug–drug interactions due to induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1) mediated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR). However, clinical comparisons with equal rifamycin doses or in vitro experiments respecting actual intracellular concentrations are lacking. Thus, the genuine pharmacological differences and the potential molecular mechanisms of the discordant perpetrator effects are unknown. Consequently, the cellular uptake kinetics (mass spectrometry), PXR activation (luciferase reporter gene assays), and impact on CYP3A4 and Pgp/ABCB1 expression and activity (polymerase chain reaction, enzymatic assays, flow cytometry) were evaluated in LS180 cells after treatment with different rifampicin or rifabutin concentrations for variable exposure times and eventually normalized to actual intracellular concentrations. In addition, inhibitory effects on CYP3A4 and Pgp activities were investigated. While rifampicin is poorly taken up by LS180 cells, it strongly activates PXR and leads to enhanced expression and activity of CYP3A4 and Pgp. In contrast, rifabutin is a significantly less potent and less efficient PXR activator and gene inducer, despite sixfold to eightfold higher intracellular accumulation. Finally, rifabutin is a potent inhibitor of Pgp (IC(50) = 0.3 µM) compared to rifampicin (IC(50) = 12.9 µM). Together, rifampicin and rifabutin significantly differ by their effects on the regulation and function of CYP3A4 and Pgp, even when controlled for intracellular concentrations. Rifabutin’s concurrent Pgp inhibitory action might partly compensate the inducing effects, explaining its weaker clinical perpetrator characteristics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00204-023-03531-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10322781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103227812023-07-07 Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin Nilles, Julie Weiss, Johanna Sauter, Max Haefeli, Walter E. Ruez, Stephanie Theile, Dirk Arch Toxicol Organ Toxicity and Mechanisms Compared to rifampicin (600 mg/day), standard doses of rifabutin (300 mg/day) have a lower risk of drug–drug interactions due to induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1) mediated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR). However, clinical comparisons with equal rifamycin doses or in vitro experiments respecting actual intracellular concentrations are lacking. Thus, the genuine pharmacological differences and the potential molecular mechanisms of the discordant perpetrator effects are unknown. Consequently, the cellular uptake kinetics (mass spectrometry), PXR activation (luciferase reporter gene assays), and impact on CYP3A4 and Pgp/ABCB1 expression and activity (polymerase chain reaction, enzymatic assays, flow cytometry) were evaluated in LS180 cells after treatment with different rifampicin or rifabutin concentrations for variable exposure times and eventually normalized to actual intracellular concentrations. In addition, inhibitory effects on CYP3A4 and Pgp activities were investigated. While rifampicin is poorly taken up by LS180 cells, it strongly activates PXR and leads to enhanced expression and activity of CYP3A4 and Pgp. In contrast, rifabutin is a significantly less potent and less efficient PXR activator and gene inducer, despite sixfold to eightfold higher intracellular accumulation. Finally, rifabutin is a potent inhibitor of Pgp (IC(50) = 0.3 µM) compared to rifampicin (IC(50) = 12.9 µM). Together, rifampicin and rifabutin significantly differ by their effects on the regulation and function of CYP3A4 and Pgp, even when controlled for intracellular concentrations. Rifabutin’s concurrent Pgp inhibitory action might partly compensate the inducing effects, explaining its weaker clinical perpetrator characteristics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00204-023-03531-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10322781/ /pubmed/37285043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03531-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Organ Toxicity and Mechanisms
Nilles, Julie
Weiss, Johanna
Sauter, Max
Haefeli, Walter E.
Ruez, Stephanie
Theile, Dirk
Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin
title Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin
title_full Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin
title_fullStr Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin
title_short Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin
title_sort comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug–drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin
topic Organ Toxicity and Mechanisms
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03531-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nillesjulie comprehensiveinvitroanalysisevaluatingthevariabledrugdruginteractionriskofrifampicincomparedtorifabutin
AT weissjohanna comprehensiveinvitroanalysisevaluatingthevariabledrugdruginteractionriskofrifampicincomparedtorifabutin
AT sautermax comprehensiveinvitroanalysisevaluatingthevariabledrugdruginteractionriskofrifampicincomparedtorifabutin
AT haefeliwaltere comprehensiveinvitroanalysisevaluatingthevariabledrugdruginteractionriskofrifampicincomparedtorifabutin
AT ruezstephanie comprehensiveinvitroanalysisevaluatingthevariabledrugdruginteractionriskofrifampicincomparedtorifabutin
AT theiledirk comprehensiveinvitroanalysisevaluatingthevariabledrugdruginteractionriskofrifampicincomparedtorifabutin