Cargando…

Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention

Deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for functionally insignificant stenosis, defined as fractional flow reserve (FFR) > 0.80, is associated with favorable long-term prognoses. The lower-the-better strategy for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management is an establish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Takuro, Shimazaki, Kensuke, Moriyama, Tetsu, Murohashi, Akira, Iwanami, Yuji, Sasaki, Akihito, Saito, Katsumi, Jujo, Kentaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37988-z
_version_ 1785068841615753216
author Abe, Takuro
Shimazaki, Kensuke
Moriyama, Tetsu
Murohashi, Akira
Iwanami, Yuji
Sasaki, Akihito
Saito, Katsumi
Jujo, Kentaro
author_facet Abe, Takuro
Shimazaki, Kensuke
Moriyama, Tetsu
Murohashi, Akira
Iwanami, Yuji
Sasaki, Akihito
Saito, Katsumi
Jujo, Kentaro
author_sort Abe, Takuro
collection PubMed
description Deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for functionally insignificant stenosis, defined as fractional flow reserve (FFR) > 0.80, is associated with favorable long-term prognoses. The lower-the-better strategy for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management is an established non-angioplasty therapy to improve the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI. We examined the optimal LDL-C management in cases of intermediate coronary stenosis with deferred PCI on the basis of FFR values. This observational study included 273 consecutive patients with a single target vessel and deferred PCI with an FFR > 0.80. Patients with an FFR of 0.81–0.85 (n = 93) and those with FFR > 0.85 (n = 180) were classified into the lower (< 100 mg/dL) and higher (≥ 100 mg/dL) LDL-C groups. The endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and unplanned revascularization. Patients with an FFR of 0.81–0.85 had a significantly higher MACCE rate than those with an FFR > 0.85 (log-rank, p = 0.003). In patients with an FFR of 0.81–0.85, the lower LDL-C group showed a significantly lower MACCE rate than the higher LDL-C group (log-rank, p = 0.006). However, the event rate did not differ significantly between the two groups in patients with FFR > 0.85 (log-rank, p = 0.84). Uncontrolled LDL-C levels were associated with higher MACCE rates in cases with deferred PCI due to an FFR of 0.81–0.85. This high-risk population for adverse cardiovascular events should receive strict LDL-C-lowering therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10322823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103228232023-07-07 Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention Abe, Takuro Shimazaki, Kensuke Moriyama, Tetsu Murohashi, Akira Iwanami, Yuji Sasaki, Akihito Saito, Katsumi Jujo, Kentaro Sci Rep Article Deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for functionally insignificant stenosis, defined as fractional flow reserve (FFR) > 0.80, is associated with favorable long-term prognoses. The lower-the-better strategy for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management is an established non-angioplasty therapy to improve the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI. We examined the optimal LDL-C management in cases of intermediate coronary stenosis with deferred PCI on the basis of FFR values. This observational study included 273 consecutive patients with a single target vessel and deferred PCI with an FFR > 0.80. Patients with an FFR of 0.81–0.85 (n = 93) and those with FFR > 0.85 (n = 180) were classified into the lower (< 100 mg/dL) and higher (≥ 100 mg/dL) LDL-C groups. The endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and unplanned revascularization. Patients with an FFR of 0.81–0.85 had a significantly higher MACCE rate than those with an FFR > 0.85 (log-rank, p = 0.003). In patients with an FFR of 0.81–0.85, the lower LDL-C group showed a significantly lower MACCE rate than the higher LDL-C group (log-rank, p = 0.006). However, the event rate did not differ significantly between the two groups in patients with FFR > 0.85 (log-rank, p = 0.84). Uncontrolled LDL-C levels were associated with higher MACCE rates in cases with deferred PCI due to an FFR of 0.81–0.85. This high-risk population for adverse cardiovascular events should receive strict LDL-C-lowering therapy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10322823/ /pubmed/37407607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37988-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Abe, Takuro
Shimazaki, Kensuke
Moriyama, Tetsu
Murohashi, Akira
Iwanami, Yuji
Sasaki, Akihito
Saito, Katsumi
Jujo, Kentaro
Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention
title Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention
title_fullStr Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full_unstemmed Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention
title_short Optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention
title_sort optimal lipid-lowering therapy in patients who were functionally deferred percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37988-z
work_keys_str_mv AT abetakuro optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT shimazakikensuke optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT moriyamatetsu optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT murohashiakira optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT iwanamiyuji optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT sasakiakihito optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT saitokatsumi optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT jujokentaro optimallipidloweringtherapyinpatientswhowerefunctionallydeferredpercutaneouscoronaryintervention