Cargando…

Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer

The present study compared the thickness and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners (CAs) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and evaluated their translucency using spectrophotometer. Four groups of CAs were tested: thermoformed with polyethylene terephthalate glycol (TS) or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, So Yeon, Choi, Sung-Hwan, Yu, Hyung-Seog, Kim, Su-Jung, Kim, Hoon, Kim, Ki Beom, Cha, Jung-Yul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36851-5
_version_ 1785068847588442112
author Park, So Yeon
Choi, Sung-Hwan
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Kim, Su-Jung
Kim, Hoon
Kim, Ki Beom
Cha, Jung-Yul
author_facet Park, So Yeon
Choi, Sung-Hwan
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Kim, Su-Jung
Kim, Hoon
Kim, Ki Beom
Cha, Jung-Yul
author_sort Park, So Yeon
collection PubMed
description The present study compared the thickness and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners (CAs) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and evaluated their translucency using spectrophotometer. Four groups of CAs were tested: thermoformed with polyethylene terephthalate glycol (TS) or copolyester-elastomer combination (TM), and 3D-printed TC-85 cleaned with alcohol (PA) or with centrifuge (PC). CIELab coordinates were measured (n = 10) to evaluate translucency. CAs (n = 10) were fitted onto respective models and micro-CT was performed to evaluate the thickness and gap width. Thickness and gap width were measured for different tooth type and location in sagittal sections on all sides. The PC group showed significantly higher translucency than the PA group, which was similar to the TS and TM groups (p < 0.01). After the manufacturing process, thickness reduction was observed in the thermoformed groups, whereas thickness increase was observed in the 3D printed-groups. The TM group showed the least gap width amongst the groups (p < 0.01). Thermoformed and 3D-printed CAs had significantly varied thicknesses and regions of best fit depending on the tooth type and location. Differences in the translucency and thickness of the 3D-printed CAs were observed depending on the cleaning methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10322848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103228482023-07-07 Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer Park, So Yeon Choi, Sung-Hwan Yu, Hyung-Seog Kim, Su-Jung Kim, Hoon Kim, Ki Beom Cha, Jung-Yul Sci Rep Article The present study compared the thickness and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners (CAs) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and evaluated their translucency using spectrophotometer. Four groups of CAs were tested: thermoformed with polyethylene terephthalate glycol (TS) or copolyester-elastomer combination (TM), and 3D-printed TC-85 cleaned with alcohol (PA) or with centrifuge (PC). CIELab coordinates were measured (n = 10) to evaluate translucency. CAs (n = 10) were fitted onto respective models and micro-CT was performed to evaluate the thickness and gap width. Thickness and gap width were measured for different tooth type and location in sagittal sections on all sides. The PC group showed significantly higher translucency than the PA group, which was similar to the TS and TM groups (p < 0.01). After the manufacturing process, thickness reduction was observed in the thermoformed groups, whereas thickness increase was observed in the 3D printed-groups. The TM group showed the least gap width amongst the groups (p < 0.01). Thermoformed and 3D-printed CAs had significantly varied thicknesses and regions of best fit depending on the tooth type and location. Differences in the translucency and thickness of the 3D-printed CAs were observed depending on the cleaning methods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10322848/ /pubmed/37407694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36851-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Park, So Yeon
Choi, Sung-Hwan
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Kim, Su-Jung
Kim, Hoon
Kim, Ki Beom
Cha, Jung-Yul
Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer
title Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer
title_full Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer
title_fullStr Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer
title_short Comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners using micro-CT and spectrophotometer
title_sort comparison of translucency, thickness, and gap width of thermoformed and 3d-printed clear aligners using micro-ct and spectrophotometer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36851-5
work_keys_str_mv AT parksoyeon comparisonoftranslucencythicknessandgapwidthofthermoformedand3dprintedclearalignersusingmicroctandspectrophotometer
AT choisunghwan comparisonoftranslucencythicknessandgapwidthofthermoformedand3dprintedclearalignersusingmicroctandspectrophotometer
AT yuhyungseog comparisonoftranslucencythicknessandgapwidthofthermoformedand3dprintedclearalignersusingmicroctandspectrophotometer
AT kimsujung comparisonoftranslucencythicknessandgapwidthofthermoformedand3dprintedclearalignersusingmicroctandspectrophotometer
AT kimhoon comparisonoftranslucencythicknessandgapwidthofthermoformedand3dprintedclearalignersusingmicroctandspectrophotometer
AT kimkibeom comparisonoftranslucencythicknessandgapwidthofthermoformedand3dprintedclearalignersusingmicroctandspectrophotometer
AT chajungyul comparisonoftranslucencythicknessandgapwidthofthermoformedand3dprintedclearalignersusingmicroctandspectrophotometer