Cargando…
Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
BACKGROUND: Mesh augmentation is a highly controversial adjunct of hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. The current scientific evidence remains unclear and even experts disagree on indications and surgical techniques. With an aim to avoid the downsides of both non-resorbable synthetic and biological material...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0 |
_version_ | 1785068871320862720 |
---|---|
author | Ukegjini, Kristjan Vetter, Diana Dirr, Valerian Gutschow, Christian A. |
author_facet | Ukegjini, Kristjan Vetter, Diana Dirr, Valerian Gutschow, Christian A. |
author_sort | Ukegjini, Kristjan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mesh augmentation is a highly controversial adjunct of hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. The current scientific evidence remains unclear and even experts disagree on indications and surgical techniques. With an aim to avoid the downsides of both non-resorbable synthetic and biological materials, biosynthetic long-term resorbable meshes (BSM) have recently been developed and are becoming increasingly popular. In this context, we aimed at assessing outcomes after HH repair with this new generation of mesh at our institution. METHODS: From a prospective database, we identified all consecutive patients that underwent HH repair with BSM augmentation. Data was extracted from electronic patient charts of our hospital information system. Endpoints of this analysis included perioperative morbidity, functional results and recurrence rates at follow-up. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and July 2022, 97 patients (elective primary cases n = 76, redo cases n = 13, emergency cases n = 8) underwent HH with BSM augmentation. Indications in elective and emergency cases were paraesophageal (Type II–IV) HH in 83%, and large Type I HH in 4%. There was no perioperative mortality, and overall (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2) and severe (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3b) postoperative morbidity was 15% and 3%, respectively. An outcome without postoperative complications was achieved in 85% of cases (elective primary surgery 88%, redo cases 100%, emergencies cases 25%). After a median (IQR) postoperative follow-up of 12 months, 69 patients (74%) were asymptomatic, 15 (16%) reported improvement, and 9 (10%) had clinical failure, of which 2 patients (2%) required revisional surgery. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HH repair with BSM augmentation is feasible and safe with low perioperative morbidity and acceptable postoperative failure rates at early to mid-term follow-up. BSM may be a useful alternative to non-resorbable materials in HH surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10322952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103229522023-07-07 Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience Ukegjini, Kristjan Vetter, Diana Dirr, Valerian Gutschow, Christian A. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Mesh augmentation is a highly controversial adjunct of hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. The current scientific evidence remains unclear and even experts disagree on indications and surgical techniques. With an aim to avoid the downsides of both non-resorbable synthetic and biological materials, biosynthetic long-term resorbable meshes (BSM) have recently been developed and are becoming increasingly popular. In this context, we aimed at assessing outcomes after HH repair with this new generation of mesh at our institution. METHODS: From a prospective database, we identified all consecutive patients that underwent HH repair with BSM augmentation. Data was extracted from electronic patient charts of our hospital information system. Endpoints of this analysis included perioperative morbidity, functional results and recurrence rates at follow-up. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and July 2022, 97 patients (elective primary cases n = 76, redo cases n = 13, emergency cases n = 8) underwent HH with BSM augmentation. Indications in elective and emergency cases were paraesophageal (Type II–IV) HH in 83%, and large Type I HH in 4%. There was no perioperative mortality, and overall (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2) and severe (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3b) postoperative morbidity was 15% and 3%, respectively. An outcome without postoperative complications was achieved in 85% of cases (elective primary surgery 88%, redo cases 100%, emergencies cases 25%). After a median (IQR) postoperative follow-up of 12 months, 69 patients (74%) were asymptomatic, 15 (16%) reported improvement, and 9 (10%) had clinical failure, of which 2 patients (2%) required revisional surgery. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HH repair with BSM augmentation is feasible and safe with low perioperative morbidity and acceptable postoperative failure rates at early to mid-term follow-up. BSM may be a useful alternative to non-resorbable materials in HH surgery. Springer US 2023-03-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10322952/ /pubmed/36976420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ukegjini, Kristjan Vetter, Diana Dirr, Valerian Gutschow, Christian A. Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience |
title | Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience |
title_full | Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience |
title_fullStr | Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience |
title_short | Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience |
title_sort | hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ukegjinikristjan hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience AT vetterdiana hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience AT dirrvalerian hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience AT gutschowchristiana hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience |