Cargando…

Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Mesh augmentation is a highly controversial adjunct of hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. The current scientific evidence remains unclear and even experts disagree on indications and surgical techniques. With an aim to avoid the downsides of both non-resorbable synthetic and biological material...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ukegjini, Kristjan, Vetter, Diana, Dirr, Valerian, Gutschow, Christian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0
_version_ 1785068871320862720
author Ukegjini, Kristjan
Vetter, Diana
Dirr, Valerian
Gutschow, Christian A.
author_facet Ukegjini, Kristjan
Vetter, Diana
Dirr, Valerian
Gutschow, Christian A.
author_sort Ukegjini, Kristjan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mesh augmentation is a highly controversial adjunct of hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. The current scientific evidence remains unclear and even experts disagree on indications and surgical techniques. With an aim to avoid the downsides of both non-resorbable synthetic and biological materials, biosynthetic long-term resorbable meshes (BSM) have recently been developed and are becoming increasingly popular. In this context, we aimed at assessing outcomes after HH repair with this new generation of mesh at our institution. METHODS: From a prospective database, we identified all consecutive patients that underwent HH repair with BSM augmentation. Data was extracted from electronic patient charts of our hospital information system. Endpoints of this analysis included perioperative morbidity, functional results and recurrence rates at follow-up. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and July 2022, 97 patients (elective primary cases n = 76, redo cases n = 13, emergency cases n = 8) underwent HH with BSM augmentation. Indications in elective and emergency cases were paraesophageal (Type II–IV) HH in 83%, and large Type I HH in 4%. There was no perioperative mortality, and overall (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2) and severe (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3b) postoperative morbidity was 15% and 3%, respectively. An outcome without postoperative complications was achieved in 85% of cases (elective primary surgery 88%, redo cases 100%, emergencies cases 25%). After a median (IQR) postoperative follow-up of 12 months, 69 patients (74%) were asymptomatic, 15 (16%) reported improvement, and 9 (10%) had clinical failure, of which 2 patients (2%) required revisional surgery. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HH repair with BSM augmentation is feasible and safe with low perioperative morbidity and acceptable postoperative failure rates at early to mid-term follow-up. BSM may be a useful alternative to non-resorbable materials in HH surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10322952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103229522023-07-07 Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience Ukegjini, Kristjan Vetter, Diana Dirr, Valerian Gutschow, Christian A. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Mesh augmentation is a highly controversial adjunct of hiatus hernia (HH) surgery. The current scientific evidence remains unclear and even experts disagree on indications and surgical techniques. With an aim to avoid the downsides of both non-resorbable synthetic and biological materials, biosynthetic long-term resorbable meshes (BSM) have recently been developed and are becoming increasingly popular. In this context, we aimed at assessing outcomes after HH repair with this new generation of mesh at our institution. METHODS: From a prospective database, we identified all consecutive patients that underwent HH repair with BSM augmentation. Data was extracted from electronic patient charts of our hospital information system. Endpoints of this analysis included perioperative morbidity, functional results and recurrence rates at follow-up. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and July 2022, 97 patients (elective primary cases n = 76, redo cases n = 13, emergency cases n = 8) underwent HH with BSM augmentation. Indications in elective and emergency cases were paraesophageal (Type II–IV) HH in 83%, and large Type I HH in 4%. There was no perioperative mortality, and overall (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2) and severe (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3b) postoperative morbidity was 15% and 3%, respectively. An outcome without postoperative complications was achieved in 85% of cases (elective primary surgery 88%, redo cases 100%, emergencies cases 25%). After a median (IQR) postoperative follow-up of 12 months, 69 patients (74%) were asymptomatic, 15 (16%) reported improvement, and 9 (10%) had clinical failure, of which 2 patients (2%) required revisional surgery. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HH repair with BSM augmentation is feasible and safe with low perioperative morbidity and acceptable postoperative failure rates at early to mid-term follow-up. BSM may be a useful alternative to non-resorbable materials in HH surgery. Springer US 2023-03-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10322952/ /pubmed/36976420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ukegjini, Kristjan
Vetter, Diana
Dirr, Valerian
Gutschow, Christian A.
Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
title Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
title_full Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
title_fullStr Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
title_short Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
title_sort hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36976420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ukegjinikristjan hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience
AT vetterdiana hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience
AT dirrvalerian hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience
AT gutschowchristiana hiatusherniarepairwithanewgenerationbiosyntheticmesha4yearsinglecenterexperience