Cargando…

How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review

PURPOSE: The macrogeometry of a dental implant plays a decisive role in its primary stability. A larger diameter, a conical shape, and a roughened surface increase the contact area of the implant with the surrounding bone and thus improve primary stability. This is considered the basis for successfu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heimes, Diana, Becker, Philipp, Pabst, Andreas, Smeets, Ralf, Kraus, Annika, Hartmann, Amely, Sagheb, Keyvan, Kämmerer, Peer W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z
_version_ 1785068888929599488
author Heimes, Diana
Becker, Philipp
Pabst, Andreas
Smeets, Ralf
Kraus, Annika
Hartmann, Amely
Sagheb, Keyvan
Kämmerer, Peer W.
author_facet Heimes, Diana
Becker, Philipp
Pabst, Andreas
Smeets, Ralf
Kraus, Annika
Hartmann, Amely
Sagheb, Keyvan
Kämmerer, Peer W.
author_sort Heimes, Diana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The macrogeometry of a dental implant plays a decisive role in its primary stability. A larger diameter, a conical shape, and a roughened surface increase the contact area of the implant with the surrounding bone and thus improve primary stability. This is considered the basis for successful implant osseointegration that different factors, such as implant design, can influence. This narrative review aims to critically review macro-geometric features affecting the primary stability of dental implants. METHODS: For this review, a comprehensive literature search and review of relevant studies was conducted based on formulating a research question, searching the literature using keywords and electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to search for relevant studies. These studies were screened and selected, the study quality was assessed, data were extracted, the results were summarized, and conclusions were drawn. RESULTS: The macrogeometry of a dental implant includes its surface characteristics, size, and shape, all of which play a critical role in its primary stability. At the time of placement, the initial stability of an implant is determined by its contact area with the surrounding bone. Larger diameter and a conical shape of an implant result in a larger contact area and better primary stability. But the linear relationship between implant length and primary stability ends at 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors must be considered when choosing the ideal implant geometry, including local factors such as the condition of the bone and soft tissues at the implant site and systemic and patient-specific factors such as osteoporosis, diabetes, or autoimmune diseases. These factors can affect the success of the implant procedure and the long-term stability of an implant. By considering these factors, the surgeon can ensure the greatest possible therapeutic success and minimize the risk of implant failure. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10323072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103230722023-07-07 How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review Heimes, Diana Becker, Philipp Pabst, Andreas Smeets, Ralf Kraus, Annika Hartmann, Amely Sagheb, Keyvan Kämmerer, Peer W. Int J Implant Dent Review PURPOSE: The macrogeometry of a dental implant plays a decisive role in its primary stability. A larger diameter, a conical shape, and a roughened surface increase the contact area of the implant with the surrounding bone and thus improve primary stability. This is considered the basis for successful implant osseointegration that different factors, such as implant design, can influence. This narrative review aims to critically review macro-geometric features affecting the primary stability of dental implants. METHODS: For this review, a comprehensive literature search and review of relevant studies was conducted based on formulating a research question, searching the literature using keywords and electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to search for relevant studies. These studies were screened and selected, the study quality was assessed, data were extracted, the results were summarized, and conclusions were drawn. RESULTS: The macrogeometry of a dental implant includes its surface characteristics, size, and shape, all of which play a critical role in its primary stability. At the time of placement, the initial stability of an implant is determined by its contact area with the surrounding bone. Larger diameter and a conical shape of an implant result in a larger contact area and better primary stability. But the linear relationship between implant length and primary stability ends at 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors must be considered when choosing the ideal implant geometry, including local factors such as the condition of the bone and soft tissues at the implant site and systemic and patient-specific factors such as osteoporosis, diabetes, or autoimmune diseases. These factors can affect the success of the implant procedure and the long-term stability of an implant. By considering these factors, the surgeon can ensure the greatest possible therapeutic success and minimize the risk of implant failure. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10323072/ /pubmed/37405709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Heimes, Diana
Becker, Philipp
Pabst, Andreas
Smeets, Ralf
Kraus, Annika
Hartmann, Amely
Sagheb, Keyvan
Kämmerer, Peer W.
How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review
title How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review
title_full How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review
title_fullStr How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review
title_full_unstemmed How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review
title_short How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review
title_sort how does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z
work_keys_str_mv AT heimesdiana howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview
AT beckerphilipp howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview
AT pabstandreas howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview
AT smeetsralf howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview
AT krausannika howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview
AT hartmannamely howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview
AT saghebkeyvan howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview
AT kammererpeerw howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview