Cargando…
How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review
PURPOSE: The macrogeometry of a dental implant plays a decisive role in its primary stability. A larger diameter, a conical shape, and a roughened surface increase the contact area of the implant with the surrounding bone and thus improve primary stability. This is considered the basis for successfu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z |
_version_ | 1785068888929599488 |
---|---|
author | Heimes, Diana Becker, Philipp Pabst, Andreas Smeets, Ralf Kraus, Annika Hartmann, Amely Sagheb, Keyvan Kämmerer, Peer W. |
author_facet | Heimes, Diana Becker, Philipp Pabst, Andreas Smeets, Ralf Kraus, Annika Hartmann, Amely Sagheb, Keyvan Kämmerer, Peer W. |
author_sort | Heimes, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The macrogeometry of a dental implant plays a decisive role in its primary stability. A larger diameter, a conical shape, and a roughened surface increase the contact area of the implant with the surrounding bone and thus improve primary stability. This is considered the basis for successful implant osseointegration that different factors, such as implant design, can influence. This narrative review aims to critically review macro-geometric features affecting the primary stability of dental implants. METHODS: For this review, a comprehensive literature search and review of relevant studies was conducted based on formulating a research question, searching the literature using keywords and electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to search for relevant studies. These studies were screened and selected, the study quality was assessed, data were extracted, the results were summarized, and conclusions were drawn. RESULTS: The macrogeometry of a dental implant includes its surface characteristics, size, and shape, all of which play a critical role in its primary stability. At the time of placement, the initial stability of an implant is determined by its contact area with the surrounding bone. Larger diameter and a conical shape of an implant result in a larger contact area and better primary stability. But the linear relationship between implant length and primary stability ends at 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors must be considered when choosing the ideal implant geometry, including local factors such as the condition of the bone and soft tissues at the implant site and systemic and patient-specific factors such as osteoporosis, diabetes, or autoimmune diseases. These factors can affect the success of the implant procedure and the long-term stability of an implant. By considering these factors, the surgeon can ensure the greatest possible therapeutic success and minimize the risk of implant failure. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10323072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103230722023-07-07 How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review Heimes, Diana Becker, Philipp Pabst, Andreas Smeets, Ralf Kraus, Annika Hartmann, Amely Sagheb, Keyvan Kämmerer, Peer W. Int J Implant Dent Review PURPOSE: The macrogeometry of a dental implant plays a decisive role in its primary stability. A larger diameter, a conical shape, and a roughened surface increase the contact area of the implant with the surrounding bone and thus improve primary stability. This is considered the basis for successful implant osseointegration that different factors, such as implant design, can influence. This narrative review aims to critically review macro-geometric features affecting the primary stability of dental implants. METHODS: For this review, a comprehensive literature search and review of relevant studies was conducted based on formulating a research question, searching the literature using keywords and electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to search for relevant studies. These studies were screened and selected, the study quality was assessed, data were extracted, the results were summarized, and conclusions were drawn. RESULTS: The macrogeometry of a dental implant includes its surface characteristics, size, and shape, all of which play a critical role in its primary stability. At the time of placement, the initial stability of an implant is determined by its contact area with the surrounding bone. Larger diameter and a conical shape of an implant result in a larger contact area and better primary stability. But the linear relationship between implant length and primary stability ends at 12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors must be considered when choosing the ideal implant geometry, including local factors such as the condition of the bone and soft tissues at the implant site and systemic and patient-specific factors such as osteoporosis, diabetes, or autoimmune diseases. These factors can affect the success of the implant procedure and the long-term stability of an implant. By considering these factors, the surgeon can ensure the greatest possible therapeutic success and minimize the risk of implant failure. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10323072/ /pubmed/37405709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Heimes, Diana Becker, Philipp Pabst, Andreas Smeets, Ralf Kraus, Annika Hartmann, Amely Sagheb, Keyvan Kämmerer, Peer W. How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review |
title | How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review |
title_full | How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review |
title_fullStr | How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review |
title_short | How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review |
title_sort | how does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heimesdiana howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview AT beckerphilipp howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview AT pabstandreas howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview AT smeetsralf howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview AT krausannika howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview AT hartmannamely howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview AT saghebkeyvan howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview AT kammererpeerw howdoesdentalimplantmacrogeometryaffectprimaryimplantstabilityanarrativereview |