Cargando…

Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival outcomes, posttreatment complications, and quality of life (QoL) of early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors between those who received adjuvant pelvic radiation and those without adjuvant treatment. METHODS: Stages IB–IIA cervical cancer pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa, Muangmool, Tanarat, Charoenkwan, Kittipat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e42
_version_ 1785068937647489024
author Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa
Muangmool, Tanarat
Charoenkwan, Kittipat
author_facet Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa
Muangmool, Tanarat
Charoenkwan, Kittipat
author_sort Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare survival outcomes, posttreatment complications, and quality of life (QoL) of early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors between those who received adjuvant pelvic radiation and those without adjuvant treatment. METHODS: Stages IB–IIA cervical cancer patients classified as having intermediate-risk following primary radical surgery were included. After propensity score weighted adjustment, all baseline demographic and pathological characteristics of 108 women who received adjuvant radiation and 111 women who had no adjuvant treatment were compared. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included treatment-related complications and QoL. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 76.1 months in the adjuvant radiation group and 95.4 months in the observation group. The 5-year PFS (91.6% in the adjuvant radiation group and 88.4% in the observation group, p=0.42) and OS (90.1% in the adjuvant radiation group and 93.5% in the observation group, p=0.36) were not significantly different between the groups. There was no significant association between adjuvant treatment and overall recurrence/death in the Cox proportional hazard model. However, a substantial reduction in pelvic recurrence was observed in participants with adjuvant radiation (hazard ratio=0.15; 95% confidence interval=0.03–0.71). Grade 3/4 treatment-related morbidities and QoL scores were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiation was associated with a lower risk of pelvic recurrence. However, its significant benefit in reducing overall recurrence and improving survival in early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors could not be demonstrated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10323307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103233072023-07-07 Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa Muangmool, Tanarat Charoenkwan, Kittipat J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare survival outcomes, posttreatment complications, and quality of life (QoL) of early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors between those who received adjuvant pelvic radiation and those without adjuvant treatment. METHODS: Stages IB–IIA cervical cancer patients classified as having intermediate-risk following primary radical surgery were included. After propensity score weighted adjustment, all baseline demographic and pathological characteristics of 108 women who received adjuvant radiation and 111 women who had no adjuvant treatment were compared. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included treatment-related complications and QoL. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 76.1 months in the adjuvant radiation group and 95.4 months in the observation group. The 5-year PFS (91.6% in the adjuvant radiation group and 88.4% in the observation group, p=0.42) and OS (90.1% in the adjuvant radiation group and 93.5% in the observation group, p=0.36) were not significantly different between the groups. There was no significant association between adjuvant treatment and overall recurrence/death in the Cox proportional hazard model. However, a substantial reduction in pelvic recurrence was observed in participants with adjuvant radiation (hazard ratio=0.15; 95% confidence interval=0.03–0.71). Grade 3/4 treatment-related morbidities and QoL scores were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiation was associated with a lower risk of pelvic recurrence. However, its significant benefit in reducing overall recurrence and improving survival in early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors could not be demonstrated. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10323307/ /pubmed/36807745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e42 Text en © 2023. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa
Muangmool, Tanarat
Charoenkwan, Kittipat
Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis
title Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis
title_full Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis
title_fullStr Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis
title_short Adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis
title_sort adjuvant pelvic radiation versus observation in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following primary radical surgery: a propensity score-adjusted analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e42
work_keys_str_mv AT tuscharoenpornthunwipa adjuvantpelvicradiationversusobservationinintermediateriskearlystagecervicalcancerpatientsfollowingprimaryradicalsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis
AT muangmooltanarat adjuvantpelvicradiationversusobservationinintermediateriskearlystagecervicalcancerpatientsfollowingprimaryradicalsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis
AT charoenkwankittipat adjuvantpelvicradiationversusobservationinintermediateriskearlystagecervicalcancerpatientsfollowingprimaryradicalsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis