Cargando…
Commentary on “Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies”
Autores principales: | Liu, Yanting, Suvithayasiri, Siravich, Kim, Jin-Sung |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37401064 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346488.244 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies
por: Patel, Neal A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Titanium‑coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis
por: Li, Songfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Fusion assessment in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages
por: Adl Amini, Dominik, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Standalone titanium/polyetheretherketone interbody cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiological results at 24 months
por: Mobbs, Ralph J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Endplate Changes with Polyetheretherketone Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
por: Elfiky, Tarek Anwar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)