Cargando…

Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF combined with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF), and OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF) in the treatment of single-level or 2-level degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Between Jan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiangyu, Wang, Yutian, Zhang, Weikang, Liu, Shaocheng, Liu, Zhenlei, Wang, Kai, Wu, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37401071
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244954.477
_version_ 1785068949974548480
author Zhang, Xiangyu
Wang, Yutian
Zhang, Weikang
Liu, Shaocheng
Liu, Zhenlei
Wang, Kai
Wu, Hao
author_facet Zhang, Xiangyu
Wang, Yutian
Zhang, Weikang
Liu, Shaocheng
Liu, Zhenlei
Wang, Kai
Wu, Hao
author_sort Zhang, Xiangyu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF combined with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF), and OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF) in the treatment of single-level or 2-level degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Between January 2017 and 2021, 71 patients were treated with OLIF and combined OLIF. The demographic data, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups were lower than in the OLIF-PF group. Posterior disk height improvement in the OLIF-PF group was better than in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups. In terms of foraminal height (FH), the OLIF-PF group was significantly better than the OLIF group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the OLIF-PF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05) or between the OLIF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in fusion rates, the incidence of complications, lumbar lordosis, anterior disc height, and cross-sectional area among the 3 groups (p>0.05). The OLIF-PF group had significantly lower rates of subsidence than the OLIF group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: OLIF remains a viable option with similar patient-reported outcomes and fusion rates compared with surgeries that include lateral and posterior internal fixation while greatly reducing the financial burden, intraoperative time, and intraoperative blood loss. OLIF has a higher subsidence rate than lateral and posterior internal fixation, but most subsidence is mild and has no adverse effect on clinical and radiographic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10323359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103233592023-07-07 Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease Zhang, Xiangyu Wang, Yutian Zhang, Weikang Liu, Shaocheng Liu, Zhenlei Wang, Kai Wu, Hao Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF combined with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF), and OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF) in the treatment of single-level or 2-level degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Between January 2017 and 2021, 71 patients were treated with OLIF and combined OLIF. The demographic data, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups were lower than in the OLIF-PF group. Posterior disk height improvement in the OLIF-PF group was better than in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups. In terms of foraminal height (FH), the OLIF-PF group was significantly better than the OLIF group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the OLIF-PF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05) or between the OLIF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in fusion rates, the incidence of complications, lumbar lordosis, anterior disc height, and cross-sectional area among the 3 groups (p>0.05). The OLIF-PF group had significantly lower rates of subsidence than the OLIF group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: OLIF remains a viable option with similar patient-reported outcomes and fusion rates compared with surgeries that include lateral and posterior internal fixation while greatly reducing the financial burden, intraoperative time, and intraoperative blood loss. OLIF has a higher subsidence rate than lateral and posterior internal fixation, but most subsidence is mild and has no adverse effect on clinical and radiographic outcomes. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2023-06 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10323359/ /pubmed/37401071 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244954.477 Text en Copyright © 2023 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Xiangyu
Wang, Yutian
Zhang, Weikang
Liu, Shaocheng
Liu, Zhenlei
Wang, Kai
Wu, Hao
Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_full Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_fullStr Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_short Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_sort perioperative clinical features and long-term prognosis after oblique lateral interbody fusion (olif), olif with anterolateral screw fixation, or olif with percutaneous pedicle fixation: a comprehensive treatment strategy for patients with lumbar degenerative disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37401071
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244954.477
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiangyu perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT wangyutian perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT zhangweikang perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT liushaocheng perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT liuzhenlei perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT wangkai perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT wuhao perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease