Cargando…
Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF combined with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF), and OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF) in the treatment of single-level or 2-level degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Between Jan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37401071 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244954.477 |
_version_ | 1785068949974548480 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiangyu Wang, Yutian Zhang, Weikang Liu, Shaocheng Liu, Zhenlei Wang, Kai Wu, Hao |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiangyu Wang, Yutian Zhang, Weikang Liu, Shaocheng Liu, Zhenlei Wang, Kai Wu, Hao |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiangyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF combined with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF), and OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF) in the treatment of single-level or 2-level degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Between January 2017 and 2021, 71 patients were treated with OLIF and combined OLIF. The demographic data, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups were lower than in the OLIF-PF group. Posterior disk height improvement in the OLIF-PF group was better than in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups. In terms of foraminal height (FH), the OLIF-PF group was significantly better than the OLIF group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the OLIF-PF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05) or between the OLIF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in fusion rates, the incidence of complications, lumbar lordosis, anterior disc height, and cross-sectional area among the 3 groups (p>0.05). The OLIF-PF group had significantly lower rates of subsidence than the OLIF group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: OLIF remains a viable option with similar patient-reported outcomes and fusion rates compared with surgeries that include lateral and posterior internal fixation while greatly reducing the financial burden, intraoperative time, and intraoperative blood loss. OLIF has a higher subsidence rate than lateral and posterior internal fixation, but most subsidence is mild and has no adverse effect on clinical and radiographic outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10323359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103233592023-07-07 Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease Zhang, Xiangyu Wang, Yutian Zhang, Weikang Liu, Shaocheng Liu, Zhenlei Wang, Kai Wu, Hao Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF combined with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF), and OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF) in the treatment of single-level or 2-level degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Between January 2017 and 2021, 71 patients were treated with OLIF and combined OLIF. The demographic data, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups were lower than in the OLIF-PF group. Posterior disk height improvement in the OLIF-PF group was better than in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups. In terms of foraminal height (FH), the OLIF-PF group was significantly better than the OLIF group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the OLIF-PF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05) or between the OLIF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in fusion rates, the incidence of complications, lumbar lordosis, anterior disc height, and cross-sectional area among the 3 groups (p>0.05). The OLIF-PF group had significantly lower rates of subsidence than the OLIF group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: OLIF remains a viable option with similar patient-reported outcomes and fusion rates compared with surgeries that include lateral and posterior internal fixation while greatly reducing the financial burden, intraoperative time, and intraoperative blood loss. OLIF has a higher subsidence rate than lateral and posterior internal fixation, but most subsidence is mild and has no adverse effect on clinical and radiographic outcomes. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2023-06 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10323359/ /pubmed/37401071 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244954.477 Text en Copyright © 2023 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Xiangyu Wang, Yutian Zhang, Weikang Liu, Shaocheng Liu, Zhenlei Wang, Kai Wu, Hao Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease |
title | Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease |
title_full | Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease |
title_fullStr | Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease |
title_short | Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease |
title_sort | perioperative clinical features and long-term prognosis after oblique lateral interbody fusion (olif), olif with anterolateral screw fixation, or olif with percutaneous pedicle fixation: a comprehensive treatment strategy for patients with lumbar degenerative disease |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37401071 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244954.477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiangyu perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease AT wangyutian perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease AT zhangweikang perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease AT liushaocheng perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease AT liuzhenlei perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease AT wangkai perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease AT wuhao perioperativeclinicalfeaturesandlongtermprognosisafterobliquelateralinterbodyfusionolifolifwithanterolateralscrewfixationorolifwithpercutaneouspediclefixationacomprehensivetreatmentstrategyforpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease |