The accuracy of simplified calculation of mechanical power: a simulation study

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important life-saving method in the intensive care unit (ICU). A lower mechanical power (MP) is associated with a better MV strategy. However, traditional MP calculating methods are complicated, and algebraic formulas seem to be rather practical. The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy and application of different algebraic formulas calculating MP. METHODS: A lung simulator, TestChest, was used to simulate pulmonary compliance variations. Using the TestChest system software, the parameters, including compliance and airway resistance, were set to simulate various acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) lungs. Ventilator was also set to volume- and pressure-controlled modes with various parameter values (respiratory rate, RR, time of inspiration, T(insp), positive end-expiratory pressure, PEEP) to ventilate the simulated lung of ARDS (with various respiratory system compliance, C(rs)). For the lung simulator, resistance of airway (R(aw)) was fixed to 5 cmH(2)O/L/s. C(rs) below lower inflation point (LIP) or above upper inflation point (UIP) was set to 10 mL/cmH(2)O. The reference standard geometric method was calculated offline with a customized software. Three algebraic formulas for volume-controlled and three for pressure-controlled were used to calculate MP. RESULTS: The performances of the formulas were different, although the derived MP were significantly correlated with that derived from the reference method (R(2)>0.80, P<0.001). Under volume-controlled ventilation, medians of MP calculated with one equation was significantly lower than that with the reference method (P<0.001). Under pressure-controlled ventilation, median of MP calculated with two equations were significantly higher (P<0.001). The maximum difference was over 70% of the MP value calculated with the reference method. CONCLUSIONS: The algebraic formulas may introduce considerably large bias under the presented lung conditions, especially in moderate to severe ARDS. Cautious is required when selecting adequate algebraic formulas to calculate MP based on the formula’s premises, ventilation mode, and patients’ status. In clinical practice, the trend rather than the value of MP calculated by formulas should require more attention.