Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study

Background and objective Low flexural strength (FS) and impact strength (IS) are major drawbacks in removable prostheses made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Attempts to enhance the strength and longevity of these prostheses have been of keen interest among researchers. Nanofillers are new and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swaroop, Neeranshi, Katiyar, Pratibha, Pandey, Kaushik Kumar, Tarannum, Fauzia, Umar, Mohd, Paul, Swarupa, V. Dayama, Nikhil, Ahmed, Asra, Singh, Ragini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425571
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40024
_version_ 1785069006352285696
author Swaroop, Neeranshi
Katiyar, Pratibha
Pandey, Kaushik Kumar
Tarannum, Fauzia
Umar, Mohd
Paul, Swarupa
V. Dayama, Nikhil
Ahmed, Asra
Singh, Ragini
author_facet Swaroop, Neeranshi
Katiyar, Pratibha
Pandey, Kaushik Kumar
Tarannum, Fauzia
Umar, Mohd
Paul, Swarupa
V. Dayama, Nikhil
Ahmed, Asra
Singh, Ragini
author_sort Swaroop, Neeranshi
collection PubMed
description Background and objective Low flexural strength (FS) and impact strength (IS) are major drawbacks in removable prostheses made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Attempts to enhance the strength and longevity of these prostheses have been of keen interest among researchers. Nanofillers are new and advanced reinforcements that can chemically modify PMMA. Graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were used in this study to evaluate FS and IS when added to polymer and monomer individually. Method Four groups were created based on the addition of nanofillers: no nanofillers - control; 0.5% by weight of graphene; 0.5% by weight of MWCNT; and 0.25% by weight of both. These groups were further subdivided into two according to the nanofiller being added to polymer and monomer each. The samples were then subjected to a 3-point bending test to assess FS, and an Izod impact tester was used to test IS. Results Decreased FS and FS were seen in all groups with the addition of nanofillers in the polymer (p<0.001). With the addition of nanofillers in monomer, increased FS and IS were seen in groups with MWCNTs whereas a decrease was seen with the addition of graphene (p<0.001). Conclusion Nanofillers should be added to the monomer of heat-cure PMMA instead of polymer; 0.5% by weight of MWCNT has shown the highest FS and IS when added to the monomer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10323708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103237082023-07-07 A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study Swaroop, Neeranshi Katiyar, Pratibha Pandey, Kaushik Kumar Tarannum, Fauzia Umar, Mohd Paul, Swarupa V. Dayama, Nikhil Ahmed, Asra Singh, Ragini Cureus Other Background and objective Low flexural strength (FS) and impact strength (IS) are major drawbacks in removable prostheses made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Attempts to enhance the strength and longevity of these prostheses have been of keen interest among researchers. Nanofillers are new and advanced reinforcements that can chemically modify PMMA. Graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were used in this study to evaluate FS and IS when added to polymer and monomer individually. Method Four groups were created based on the addition of nanofillers: no nanofillers - control; 0.5% by weight of graphene; 0.5% by weight of MWCNT; and 0.25% by weight of both. These groups were further subdivided into two according to the nanofiller being added to polymer and monomer each. The samples were then subjected to a 3-point bending test to assess FS, and an Izod impact tester was used to test IS. Results Decreased FS and FS were seen in all groups with the addition of nanofillers in the polymer (p<0.001). With the addition of nanofillers in monomer, increased FS and IS were seen in groups with MWCNTs whereas a decrease was seen with the addition of graphene (p<0.001). Conclusion Nanofillers should be added to the monomer of heat-cure PMMA instead of polymer; 0.5% by weight of MWCNT has shown the highest FS and IS when added to the monomer. Cureus 2023-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10323708/ /pubmed/37425571 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40024 Text en Copyright © 2023, Swaroop et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Other
Swaroop, Neeranshi
Katiyar, Pratibha
Pandey, Kaushik Kumar
Tarannum, Fauzia
Umar, Mohd
Paul, Swarupa
V. Dayama, Nikhil
Ahmed, Asra
Singh, Ragini
A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Reinforced With Graphene and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of flexural and impact strength of polymethyl methacrylate (pmma) reinforced with graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes: an in vitro study
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425571
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40024
work_keys_str_mv AT swaroopneeranshi acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT katiyarpratibha acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT pandeykaushikkumar acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT tarannumfauzia acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT umarmohd acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT paulswarupa acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT vdayamanikhil acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT ahmedasra acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT singhragini acomparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT swaroopneeranshi comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT katiyarpratibha comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT pandeykaushikkumar comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT tarannumfauzia comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT umarmohd comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT paulswarupa comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT vdayamanikhil comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT ahmedasra comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy
AT singhragini comparativeevaluationofflexuralandimpactstrengthofpolymethylmethacrylatepmmareinforcedwithgrapheneandmultiwalledcarbonnanotubesaninvitrostudy