Cargando…

Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory

Researchers working in the field, the places where research-relevant activity happens, are essential to recruitment and data collection in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to understand the nature of this often invisible work. Data were generated through an RCT of a pharmacist-l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalgarno, Lindsay, Birt, Linda, Bond, Christine, Blacklock, Jeanette, Blyth, Annie, Inch, Jacqueline, Notman, Frances, Daffu-O’Reilly, Amrit, Spargo, Maureen, Watts, Laura, Wright, David, Poland, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100254
_version_ 1785069007555002368
author Dalgarno, Lindsay
Birt, Linda
Bond, Christine
Blacklock, Jeanette
Blyth, Annie
Inch, Jacqueline
Notman, Frances
Daffu-O’Reilly, Amrit
Spargo, Maureen
Watts, Laura
Wright, David
Poland, Fiona
author_facet Dalgarno, Lindsay
Birt, Linda
Bond, Christine
Blacklock, Jeanette
Blyth, Annie
Inch, Jacqueline
Notman, Frances
Daffu-O’Reilly, Amrit
Spargo, Maureen
Watts, Laura
Wright, David
Poland, Fiona
author_sort Dalgarno, Lindsay
collection PubMed
description Researchers working in the field, the places where research-relevant activity happens, are essential to recruitment and data collection in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to understand the nature of this often invisible work. Data were generated through an RCT of a pharmacist-led medication management service for older people in care homes. The study was conducted over three years and employed seven Research Associates (RA) working in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and England. Weekly research team meetings and Programme Management Group meetings naturally generated 129 sets of minutes. This documentary data was supplemented with two end-of-study RA debriefing meetings. Data were coded to sort the work being done in the field, then deductively explored through the lens of Normalization Process Theory to enable a greater understanding of the depth, breadth and complexity of work carried out by these trial delivery RAs. Results indicate RAs helped stakeholders and participants make sense of the research, they built relationships with participants to support retention, operationalised complex data collection procedures and reflected on their own work contexts to reach agreement on changes to trial procedures. The debrief discussions enabled RAs to explore and reflect on experiences from the field which had affected their day-to-day work. The learning from the challenges faced in facilitating care home research may be useful to inform future research team preparation for complex interventions. Scrutinising these data sources through the lens of NPT enabled us to identify RAs as linchpins in the successful conduct of a complex RCT study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10323713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103237132023-07-07 Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory Dalgarno, Lindsay Birt, Linda Bond, Christine Blacklock, Jeanette Blyth, Annie Inch, Jacqueline Notman, Frances Daffu-O’Reilly, Amrit Spargo, Maureen Watts, Laura Wright, David Poland, Fiona SSM Qual Res Health Article Researchers working in the field, the places where research-relevant activity happens, are essential to recruitment and data collection in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to understand the nature of this often invisible work. Data were generated through an RCT of a pharmacist-led medication management service for older people in care homes. The study was conducted over three years and employed seven Research Associates (RA) working in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and England. Weekly research team meetings and Programme Management Group meetings naturally generated 129 sets of minutes. This documentary data was supplemented with two end-of-study RA debriefing meetings. Data were coded to sort the work being done in the field, then deductively explored through the lens of Normalization Process Theory to enable a greater understanding of the depth, breadth and complexity of work carried out by these trial delivery RAs. Results indicate RAs helped stakeholders and participants make sense of the research, they built relationships with participants to support retention, operationalised complex data collection procedures and reflected on their own work contexts to reach agreement on changes to trial procedures. The debrief discussions enabled RAs to explore and reflect on experiences from the field which had affected their day-to-day work. The learning from the challenges faced in facilitating care home research may be useful to inform future research team preparation for complex interventions. Scrutinising these data sources through the lens of NPT enabled us to identify RAs as linchpins in the successful conduct of a complex RCT study. Elsevier Ltd 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10323713/ /pubmed/37426703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100254 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dalgarno, Lindsay
Birt, Linda
Bond, Christine
Blacklock, Jeanette
Blyth, Annie
Inch, Jacqueline
Notman, Frances
Daffu-O’Reilly, Amrit
Spargo, Maureen
Watts, Laura
Wright, David
Poland, Fiona
Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory
title Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory
title_full Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory
title_fullStr Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory
title_full_unstemmed Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory
title_short Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory
title_sort why the trial researcher matters: day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100254
work_keys_str_mv AT dalgarnolindsay whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT birtlinda whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT bondchristine whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT blacklockjeanette whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT blythannie whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT inchjacqueline whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT notmanfrances whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT daffuoreillyamrit whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT spargomaureen whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT wattslaura whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT wrightdavid whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory
AT polandfiona whythetrialresearchermattersdaytodayworkviewedthroughthelensofnormalizationprocesstheory