Cargando…
Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting
OBJECTIVE: The Electronic Chronic Pain Questions (eCPQ) has been developed to help healthcare providers systematically capture chronic pain data. This study evaluated the impact of using the eCPQ on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in a primary care setting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.933975 |
_version_ | 1785069015144595456 |
---|---|
author | Lamerato, Lois Shah, Vinay Abraham, Lucy Cappelleri, Joseph C. DeLor, Bonnie Ellsworth, Stacy R. Hegeman-Dingle, Rozelle Park, Peter W. |
author_facet | Lamerato, Lois Shah, Vinay Abraham, Lucy Cappelleri, Joseph C. DeLor, Bonnie Ellsworth, Stacy R. Hegeman-Dingle, Rozelle Park, Peter W. |
author_sort | Lamerato, Lois |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Electronic Chronic Pain Questions (eCPQ) has been developed to help healthcare providers systematically capture chronic pain data. This study evaluated the impact of using the eCPQ on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in a primary care setting, and patient and physician perceptions regarding use of, and satisfaction with, the eCPQ. METHODS: This was a prospective pragmatic study conducted at the Internal Medicine clinic within the Henry Ford Health (HFH) Detroit campus between June 2017 and April 2020. Patients (aged ≥18 years) attending the clinic for chronic pain were allocated to an Intervention Group to complete the eCPQ in addition to regular care, or a control group to receive regular care only. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and a Patient Global Assessment were assessed at baseline, 6-months, and 12-months study visits. HCRU data were extracted from the HFH database. Telephone qualitative interviews were conducted with randomly selected patients and physicians who used the eCPQ. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled, 79 in each treatment group completed all 3 study visits. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in PROs and HCRU between the 2 groups. In qualitative interviews, physicians and patients reported the eCPQ as useful, and using the eCPQ improved patient-clinician interactions. CONCLUSION: Adding the eCPQ to regular care for patients with chronic pain did not significantly impact the PROs assessed in this study. However, qualitative interviews suggested that the eCPQ was a well-accepted and potentially useful tool from a patient and physician perspective. By using the eCPQ, patients were better prepared when they attended a primary care visit for their chronic pain and the quality of patient-physician communication was increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10323749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103237492023-07-07 Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting Lamerato, Lois Shah, Vinay Abraham, Lucy Cappelleri, Joseph C. DeLor, Bonnie Ellsworth, Stacy R. Hegeman-Dingle, Rozelle Park, Peter W. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVE: The Electronic Chronic Pain Questions (eCPQ) has been developed to help healthcare providers systematically capture chronic pain data. This study evaluated the impact of using the eCPQ on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in a primary care setting, and patient and physician perceptions regarding use of, and satisfaction with, the eCPQ. METHODS: This was a prospective pragmatic study conducted at the Internal Medicine clinic within the Henry Ford Health (HFH) Detroit campus between June 2017 and April 2020. Patients (aged ≥18 years) attending the clinic for chronic pain were allocated to an Intervention Group to complete the eCPQ in addition to regular care, or a control group to receive regular care only. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and a Patient Global Assessment were assessed at baseline, 6-months, and 12-months study visits. HCRU data were extracted from the HFH database. Telephone qualitative interviews were conducted with randomly selected patients and physicians who used the eCPQ. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled, 79 in each treatment group completed all 3 study visits. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in PROs and HCRU between the 2 groups. In qualitative interviews, physicians and patients reported the eCPQ as useful, and using the eCPQ improved patient-clinician interactions. CONCLUSION: Adding the eCPQ to regular care for patients with chronic pain did not significantly impact the PROs assessed in this study. However, qualitative interviews suggested that the eCPQ was a well-accepted and potentially useful tool from a patient and physician perspective. By using the eCPQ, patients were better prepared when they attended a primary care visit for their chronic pain and the quality of patient-physician communication was increased. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10323749/ /pubmed/37425316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.933975 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lamerato, Shah, Abraham, Cappelleri, DeLor, Ellsworth, Hegeman-Dingle and Park. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Lamerato, Lois Shah, Vinay Abraham, Lucy Cappelleri, Joseph C. DeLor, Bonnie Ellsworth, Stacy R. Hegeman-Dingle, Rozelle Park, Peter W. Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting |
title | Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting |
title_full | Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting |
title_fullStr | Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting |
title_short | Impact of Electronic Chronic Pain Questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward eCPQ use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a US general practice setting |
title_sort | impact of electronic chronic pain questions on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization, and attitudes toward ecpq use among patients and physicians: prospective pragmatic study in a us general practice setting |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.933975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lameratolois impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting AT shahvinay impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting AT abrahamlucy impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting AT cappellerijosephc impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting AT delorbonnie impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting AT ellsworthstacyr impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting AT hegemandinglerozelle impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting AT parkpeterw impactofelectronicchronicpainquestionsonpatientreportedoutcomesandhealthcareutilizationandattitudestowardecpquseamongpatientsandphysiciansprospectivepragmaticstudyinausgeneralpracticesetting |