Cargando…
Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases
[Image: see text] This study presents the findings of an investigation involving the absorption of SO(2) from flue gases, using three different sorbents, in a spray dryer. Experimentation involved the evaluation of three sorbents, i.e., hydrated lime (Ca[OH](2)), limestone (CaCO(3)), and trona (Na(2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00064 |
_version_ | 1785069050620018688 |
---|---|
author | Koech, Lawrence Everson, Raymond C. Hattingh, Burgert Rutto, Hilary Lerotholi, Letsabisa Neomagus, Hein WJP |
author_facet | Koech, Lawrence Everson, Raymond C. Hattingh, Burgert Rutto, Hilary Lerotholi, Letsabisa Neomagus, Hein WJP |
author_sort | Koech, Lawrence |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] This study presents the findings of an investigation involving the absorption of SO(2) from flue gases, using three different sorbents, in a spray dryer. Experimentation involved the evaluation of three sorbents, i.e., hydrated lime (Ca[OH](2)), limestone (CaCO(3)), and trona (Na(2)CO(3)·NaHCO(3)·2H(2)O), and their relevant properties, for flue gas desulfurization by spray dry scrubbing. Experiments were conducted to explore the effects of spray characteristics in the spray drying scrubber on SO(2) removal efficiency using the selected sorbents. The ranges of various operating parameters were considered, including the stoichiometric molar ratio of (1.0–2.5), the inlet gas phase temperature of (120–180 °C), and an inlet SO(2) concentration of 1000 ppm. The use of trona gave better SO(2) removal characteristics; a high SO(2) removal efficiency of 94% was recorded at an inlet gas phase temperature of 120 °C and a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.5. Under the same operating conditions, Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 82 and 76% SO(2) removal efficiency, respectively. Analysis of the desulfurization products by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed the presence of CaSO(3)/Na(2)SO(3), a product of the semidry desulfurization reaction. A significant proportion of unreacted sorbent was observed when Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) sorbents were used at a stoichiometric ratio of 2.0. Trona also gave the highest degree of conversion (96%) at a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.0. Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 63 and 59%, respectively, under the same operating conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10323963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103239632023-07-07 Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases Koech, Lawrence Everson, Raymond C. Hattingh, Burgert Rutto, Hilary Lerotholi, Letsabisa Neomagus, Hein WJP ACS Omega [Image: see text] This study presents the findings of an investigation involving the absorption of SO(2) from flue gases, using three different sorbents, in a spray dryer. Experimentation involved the evaluation of three sorbents, i.e., hydrated lime (Ca[OH](2)), limestone (CaCO(3)), and trona (Na(2)CO(3)·NaHCO(3)·2H(2)O), and their relevant properties, for flue gas desulfurization by spray dry scrubbing. Experiments were conducted to explore the effects of spray characteristics in the spray drying scrubber on SO(2) removal efficiency using the selected sorbents. The ranges of various operating parameters were considered, including the stoichiometric molar ratio of (1.0–2.5), the inlet gas phase temperature of (120–180 °C), and an inlet SO(2) concentration of 1000 ppm. The use of trona gave better SO(2) removal characteristics; a high SO(2) removal efficiency of 94% was recorded at an inlet gas phase temperature of 120 °C and a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.5. Under the same operating conditions, Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 82 and 76% SO(2) removal efficiency, respectively. Analysis of the desulfurization products by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed the presence of CaSO(3)/Na(2)SO(3), a product of the semidry desulfurization reaction. A significant proportion of unreacted sorbent was observed when Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) sorbents were used at a stoichiometric ratio of 2.0. Trona also gave the highest degree of conversion (96%) at a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.0. Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 63 and 59%, respectively, under the same operating conditions. American Chemical Society 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10323963/ /pubmed/37426261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00064 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Koech, Lawrence Everson, Raymond C. Hattingh, Burgert Rutto, Hilary Lerotholi, Letsabisa Neomagus, Hein WJP Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases |
title | Comparative Study
of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing
of SO(2) from Flue Gases |
title_full | Comparative Study
of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing
of SO(2) from Flue Gases |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study
of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing
of SO(2) from Flue Gases |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study
of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing
of SO(2) from Flue Gases |
title_short | Comparative Study
of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing
of SO(2) from Flue Gases |
title_sort | comparative study
of sorbents for spray dry scrubbing
of so(2) from flue gases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koechlawrence comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases AT eversonraymondc comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases AT hattinghburgert comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases AT ruttohilary comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases AT lerotholiletsabisa comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases AT neomagusheinwjp comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases |