Cargando…

Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases

[Image: see text] This study presents the findings of an investigation involving the absorption of SO(2) from flue gases, using three different sorbents, in a spray dryer. Experimentation involved the evaluation of three sorbents, i.e., hydrated lime (Ca[OH](2)), limestone (CaCO(3)), and trona (Na(2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koech, Lawrence, Everson, Raymond C., Hattingh, Burgert, Rutto, Hilary, Lerotholi, Letsabisa, Neomagus, Hein WJP
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00064
_version_ 1785069050620018688
author Koech, Lawrence
Everson, Raymond C.
Hattingh, Burgert
Rutto, Hilary
Lerotholi, Letsabisa
Neomagus, Hein WJP
author_facet Koech, Lawrence
Everson, Raymond C.
Hattingh, Burgert
Rutto, Hilary
Lerotholi, Letsabisa
Neomagus, Hein WJP
author_sort Koech, Lawrence
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] This study presents the findings of an investigation involving the absorption of SO(2) from flue gases, using three different sorbents, in a spray dryer. Experimentation involved the evaluation of three sorbents, i.e., hydrated lime (Ca[OH](2)), limestone (CaCO(3)), and trona (Na(2)CO(3)·NaHCO(3)·2H(2)O), and their relevant properties, for flue gas desulfurization by spray dry scrubbing. Experiments were conducted to explore the effects of spray characteristics in the spray drying scrubber on SO(2) removal efficiency using the selected sorbents. The ranges of various operating parameters were considered, including the stoichiometric molar ratio of (1.0–2.5), the inlet gas phase temperature of (120–180 °C), and an inlet SO(2) concentration of 1000 ppm. The use of trona gave better SO(2) removal characteristics; a high SO(2) removal efficiency of 94% was recorded at an inlet gas phase temperature of 120 °C and a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.5. Under the same operating conditions, Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 82 and 76% SO(2) removal efficiency, respectively. Analysis of the desulfurization products by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed the presence of CaSO(3)/Na(2)SO(3), a product of the semidry desulfurization reaction. A significant proportion of unreacted sorbent was observed when Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) sorbents were used at a stoichiometric ratio of 2.0. Trona also gave the highest degree of conversion (96%) at a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.0. Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 63 and 59%, respectively, under the same operating conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10323963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103239632023-07-07 Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases Koech, Lawrence Everson, Raymond C. Hattingh, Burgert Rutto, Hilary Lerotholi, Letsabisa Neomagus, Hein WJP ACS Omega [Image: see text] This study presents the findings of an investigation involving the absorption of SO(2) from flue gases, using three different sorbents, in a spray dryer. Experimentation involved the evaluation of three sorbents, i.e., hydrated lime (Ca[OH](2)), limestone (CaCO(3)), and trona (Na(2)CO(3)·NaHCO(3)·2H(2)O), and their relevant properties, for flue gas desulfurization by spray dry scrubbing. Experiments were conducted to explore the effects of spray characteristics in the spray drying scrubber on SO(2) removal efficiency using the selected sorbents. The ranges of various operating parameters were considered, including the stoichiometric molar ratio of (1.0–2.5), the inlet gas phase temperature of (120–180 °C), and an inlet SO(2) concentration of 1000 ppm. The use of trona gave better SO(2) removal characteristics; a high SO(2) removal efficiency of 94% was recorded at an inlet gas phase temperature of 120 °C and a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.5. Under the same operating conditions, Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 82 and 76% SO(2) removal efficiency, respectively. Analysis of the desulfurization products by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed the presence of CaSO(3)/Na(2)SO(3), a product of the semidry desulfurization reaction. A significant proportion of unreacted sorbent was observed when Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) sorbents were used at a stoichiometric ratio of 2.0. Trona also gave the highest degree of conversion (96%) at a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.0. Ca[OH](2) and CaCO(3) gave 63 and 59%, respectively, under the same operating conditions. American Chemical Society 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10323963/ /pubmed/37426261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00064 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Koech, Lawrence
Everson, Raymond C.
Hattingh, Burgert
Rutto, Hilary
Lerotholi, Letsabisa
Neomagus, Hein WJP
Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases
title Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases
title_full Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases
title_short Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO(2) from Flue Gases
title_sort comparative study of sorbents for spray dry scrubbing of so(2) from flue gases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10323963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00064
work_keys_str_mv AT koechlawrence comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases
AT eversonraymondc comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases
AT hattinghburgert comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases
AT ruttohilary comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases
AT lerotholiletsabisa comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases
AT neomagusheinwjp comparativestudyofsorbentsforspraydryscrubbingofso2fromfluegases