Cargando…

No Difference in Two-Dimensional Kinematic Assessment of a 45-Degree Sidestep Cut Compared to Qualitative Assessment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Expanded Cutting Alignment Scoring Tool (E-CAST) is a two-dimensional qualitative scoring system that has demonstrated moderate inter-rater and good intra-rater reliability for the assessment of trunk and lower extremity alignment during a 45-degree sidestep cut. The prim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butler, Lauren, Wyatt, Charles, Martinez, Alexa, Erdman, Ashley, Milian, Eryn, Sugimoto, Dai, Loewen, Alex, Fernandez, Jeffrey, Hayden, Kristin, DeVerna, Amie, Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten, Ulman, Sophia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425108
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.74366
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Expanded Cutting Alignment Scoring Tool (E-CAST) is a two-dimensional qualitative scoring system that has demonstrated moderate inter-rater and good intra-rater reliability for the assessment of trunk and lower extremity alignment during a 45-degree sidestep cut. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of the quantitative version of the E-CAST among physical therapists and to compare the reliability of the quantitative E-CAST to the original qualitative E-CAST. The hypothesis was that the quantitative version of the E-CAST would demonstrate greater inter-rater and intra-rater reliability compared to the qualitative E-CAST. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort, repeated measures reliability study METHODS: Twenty-five healthy female athletes (age 13.8±1.4 years) performed three sidestep cuts with two-dimensional video capturing frontal and sagittal views. Two physical therapist raters independently scored a single trial using both views on two separate occasions. Based on the E-CAST criteria, select kinematic measurements were extracted using a motion analysis phone application. Intraclass correlation coefficients and 95% confident intervals were calculated for the total score, and kappa coefficients were calculated per kinematic variable. Correlations were converted to z-scores and compared to the six original criteria for significance (α<0.05). RESULTS: Cumulative intra- and inter-rater reliability were both good (ICC=0.821, 95% CI 0.687-0.898 and ICC=0.752, 95% CI 0.565-0.859). Cumulative intra-rater kappa coefficients ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and cumulative inter-rater kappa coefficients ranged from slight to good. No significant differences were observed between the quantitative and qualitative criteria for either inter- or intra-rater reliability (Z(obs(intra))= -0.38, p=0.352 and Z(obs(inter))= -0.30, p=0.382). CONCLUSION: The quantitative E-CAST is a reliable tool to assess trunk and lower extremity alignment during a 45-degree sidestep cut. No significant differences were observed in reliability of the quantitative versus qualitative assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b