Comparing the Scalpel-Bougie-Tube Emergency Front-of-Neck Airway (eFONA) Technique on Conventional Manikins and Ovine Larynges: Evaluating Cost, Realism, and Performance in Anaesthetic Trainees

Background Emergency front-of-neck airway (eFONA) is a crucial life-saving procedure in "cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate" (CICO) situations. It is essential to teach and maintain eFONA skills for healthcare providers, especially anesthesiologists. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of cost-effective ovine larynx models compared to conventional manikins in teaching eFONA using the scalpel-bougie-tube technique to a group of anaesthesia novices and newly appointed anaesthetic Fellows. Methods and study design The study was conducted at Walsall Manor Hospital, a district general hospital in the Midlands, UK. Participants underwent a pre-survey to assess familiarity with FONA and the ability to perform a laryngeal handshake. After a lecture and demonstration, participants performed two consecutive emergency cricothyrotomies on both ovine models and conventional manikins, followed by a post-survey to assess their confidence in performing eFONA and rate their experience using sheep larynges. Results The training session significantly improved the participants' ability to perform a laryngeal handshake and their confidence in performing eFONA. The majority of participants rated the ovine model higher in terms of realism, difficulty with penetration, difficulty in recognising landmarks, and difficulty in performing the procedure. Additionally, the ovine model was more cost-effective compared to conventional manikins. Conclusion Ovine models provide a more realistic and cost-effective alternative to conventional manikins for teaching eFONA using the scalpel-bougie-tube technique. The use of these models in routine airway teaching enhances the practical skill set of anaesthesia novices and newly appointed anaesthetists, better preparing them for CICO situations. However, further training with objective assessment methods and larger samples is needed to corroborate these findings.