Cargando…

Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017

BACKGROUND: Incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is rising, with overall prognosis re-maining very poor. Reasons for the high mortality of CCA include its late presentation in most patients, when curative options are no longer feasible, and poor response to systemic therapies for advanced disease....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zalin-Miller, Amy, Jose, Sophie, Knott, Craig, Paley, Lizz, Tataru, Daniela, Morement, Helen, Toledano, Mireille B, Khan, Shahid A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i24.3825
_version_ 1785069170279317504
author Zalin-Miller, Amy
Jose, Sophie
Knott, Craig
Paley, Lizz
Tataru, Daniela
Morement, Helen
Toledano, Mireille B
Khan, Shahid A
author_facet Zalin-Miller, Amy
Jose, Sophie
Knott, Craig
Paley, Lizz
Tataru, Daniela
Morement, Helen
Toledano, Mireille B
Khan, Shahid A
author_sort Zalin-Miller, Amy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is rising, with overall prognosis re-maining very poor. Reasons for the high mortality of CCA include its late presentation in most patients, when curative options are no longer feasible, and poor response to systemic therapies for advanced disease. Late presentation presents a large barrier to improving outcomes and is often associated with diagnosis via mergency presentation (EP). Earlier diagnoses may be made by Two Week Wait (TWW) referrals through General practitioner (GP). We hypothesise that TWW referrals and EP routes to diagnosis differ across regions in England. AIM: To investigate routes to diagnosis of CCA over time, regional variation and influencing factors. METHODS: We linked patient records from the National Cancer Registration Dataset to Hospital Episode Statistics, Cancer Waiting Times and Cancer Screening Programme datasets to define routes to diagnosis and certain patient characteristics for patients diagnosed 2006-2017 in England. We used linear probability models to investigate geographic variation by assessing the proportions of patients diagnosed via TWW referral or EP across Cancer Alliances in England, adjusting for potential confounders. Correlation between the proportion of people diagnosed by TWW referral and EP was investigated with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of 23632 patients diagnosed between 2006-2017 in England, the most common route to diagnosis was EP (49.6%). Non-TWW GP referrals accounted for 20.5% of diagnosis routes, 13.8% were diagnosed by TWW referral, and the remainder 16.2% were diagnosed via an ‘other’ or Unknown route. The proportion diagnosed via a TWW referral doubled between 2006-2017 rising from 9.9% to 19.8%, conversely EP diagnosis route declined, falling from 51.3% to 46.0%. Statistically significant variation in both the TWW referral and EP proportions was found across Cancer Alliances. Age, presence of comorbidity and underlying liver disease were independently associated with both a lower proportion of patients diagnosed via TWW referral, and a higher proportion diagnosed by EP after adjusting for other potential confounders. CONCLUSION: There is significant geographic and socio-demographic variation in routes to diagnosis of CCA in England. Knowledge sharing of best practice may improve diagnostic pathways and reduce unwarranted variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10324535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103245352023-07-07 Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017 Zalin-Miller, Amy Jose, Sophie Knott, Craig Paley, Lizz Tataru, Daniela Morement, Helen Toledano, Mireille B Khan, Shahid A World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is rising, with overall prognosis re-maining very poor. Reasons for the high mortality of CCA include its late presentation in most patients, when curative options are no longer feasible, and poor response to systemic therapies for advanced disease. Late presentation presents a large barrier to improving outcomes and is often associated with diagnosis via mergency presentation (EP). Earlier diagnoses may be made by Two Week Wait (TWW) referrals through General practitioner (GP). We hypothesise that TWW referrals and EP routes to diagnosis differ across regions in England. AIM: To investigate routes to diagnosis of CCA over time, regional variation and influencing factors. METHODS: We linked patient records from the National Cancer Registration Dataset to Hospital Episode Statistics, Cancer Waiting Times and Cancer Screening Programme datasets to define routes to diagnosis and certain patient characteristics for patients diagnosed 2006-2017 in England. We used linear probability models to investigate geographic variation by assessing the proportions of patients diagnosed via TWW referral or EP across Cancer Alliances in England, adjusting for potential confounders. Correlation between the proportion of people diagnosed by TWW referral and EP was investigated with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of 23632 patients diagnosed between 2006-2017 in England, the most common route to diagnosis was EP (49.6%). Non-TWW GP referrals accounted for 20.5% of diagnosis routes, 13.8% were diagnosed by TWW referral, and the remainder 16.2% were diagnosed via an ‘other’ or Unknown route. The proportion diagnosed via a TWW referral doubled between 2006-2017 rising from 9.9% to 19.8%, conversely EP diagnosis route declined, falling from 51.3% to 46.0%. Statistically significant variation in both the TWW referral and EP proportions was found across Cancer Alliances. Age, presence of comorbidity and underlying liver disease were independently associated with both a lower proportion of patients diagnosed via TWW referral, and a higher proportion diagnosed by EP after adjusting for other potential confounders. CONCLUSION: There is significant geographic and socio-demographic variation in routes to diagnosis of CCA in England. Knowledge sharing of best practice may improve diagnostic pathways and reduce unwarranted variation. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-06-28 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10324535/ /pubmed/37426314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i24.3825 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Zalin-Miller, Amy
Jose, Sophie
Knott, Craig
Paley, Lizz
Tataru, Daniela
Morement, Helen
Toledano, Mireille B
Khan, Shahid A
Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017
title Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017
title_full Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017
title_fullStr Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017
title_short Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017
title_sort regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in england from 2006 to 2017
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10324535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i24.3825
work_keys_str_mv AT zalinmilleramy regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017
AT josesophie regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017
AT knottcraig regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017
AT paleylizz regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017
AT tatarudaniela regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017
AT morementhelen regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017
AT toledanomireilleb regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017
AT khanshahida regionalvariationinroutestodiagnosisofcholangiocarcinomainenglandfrom2006to2017