Cargando…

Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are inflammatory conditions of the eye that can be difficult to distinguish using clinical examination alone. Computer tomography (CT) scans are often used to differentiate these two infections and to evaluate for complications. Orbital ultrasound (US)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anwar, Mohammed Rashidul, Mahant, Sanjay, Agbaje-Ojo, Toni, Mahood, Quenby, Borkhoff, Cornelia M., Parkin, Patricia C., Gill, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37410730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288011
_version_ 1785069236941488128
author Anwar, Mohammed Rashidul
Mahant, Sanjay
Agbaje-Ojo, Toni
Mahood, Quenby
Borkhoff, Cornelia M.
Parkin, Patricia C.
Gill, Peter J.
author_facet Anwar, Mohammed Rashidul
Mahant, Sanjay
Agbaje-Ojo, Toni
Mahood, Quenby
Borkhoff, Cornelia M.
Parkin, Patricia C.
Gill, Peter J.
author_sort Anwar, Mohammed Rashidul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are inflammatory conditions of the eye that can be difficult to distinguish using clinical examination alone. Computer tomography (CT) scans are often used to differentiate these two infections and to evaluate for complications. Orbital ultrasound (US) could be used as a diagnostic tool to supplement or replace CT scans as the main diagnostic modality. No prior systematic review has evaluated the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of ultrasound compared to cross-sectional imaging. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies evaluating the DTA of orbital ultrasound compared with cross-sectional imaging, to diagnose orbital cellulitis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 10, 2022. All study types were included that enrolled patients of any age with suspected or diagnosed orbital cellulitis who underwent ultrasound and a diagnostic reference standard (i.e., CT or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Two authors screened titles/abstracts for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: Of the 3548 studies identified, 20 were included: 3 cohort studies and 17 case reports/series. None of the cohort studies directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound with CT or MRI, and all had high risk of bias. Among the 46 participants, diagnostic findings were interpretable in 18 (39%) cases which reported 100% accuracy. We were unable to calculate sensitivity and specificity due to limited data. In the descriptive analysis of the case reports, ultrasound was able to diagnose orbital cellulitis in most (n = 21/23) cases. CONCLUSION: Few studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of orbital ultrasound for orbital cellulitis. The limited evidence based on low quality studies suggests that ultrasound may provide helpful diagnostic information to differentiate orbital inflammation. Future research should focus studies to determine the accuracy of orbital US and potentially reduce unnecessary exposure to radiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10325084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103250842023-07-07 Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review Anwar, Mohammed Rashidul Mahant, Sanjay Agbaje-Ojo, Toni Mahood, Quenby Borkhoff, Cornelia M. Parkin, Patricia C. Gill, Peter J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Periorbital and orbital cellulitis are inflammatory conditions of the eye that can be difficult to distinguish using clinical examination alone. Computer tomography (CT) scans are often used to differentiate these two infections and to evaluate for complications. Orbital ultrasound (US) could be used as a diagnostic tool to supplement or replace CT scans as the main diagnostic modality. No prior systematic review has evaluated the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of ultrasound compared to cross-sectional imaging. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies evaluating the DTA of orbital ultrasound compared with cross-sectional imaging, to diagnose orbital cellulitis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 10, 2022. All study types were included that enrolled patients of any age with suspected or diagnosed orbital cellulitis who underwent ultrasound and a diagnostic reference standard (i.e., CT or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Two authors screened titles/abstracts for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: Of the 3548 studies identified, 20 were included: 3 cohort studies and 17 case reports/series. None of the cohort studies directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound with CT or MRI, and all had high risk of bias. Among the 46 participants, diagnostic findings were interpretable in 18 (39%) cases which reported 100% accuracy. We were unable to calculate sensitivity and specificity due to limited data. In the descriptive analysis of the case reports, ultrasound was able to diagnose orbital cellulitis in most (n = 21/23) cases. CONCLUSION: Few studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of orbital ultrasound for orbital cellulitis. The limited evidence based on low quality studies suggests that ultrasound may provide helpful diagnostic information to differentiate orbital inflammation. Future research should focus studies to determine the accuracy of orbital US and potentially reduce unnecessary exposure to radiation. Public Library of Science 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10325084/ /pubmed/37410730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288011 Text en © 2023 Anwar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anwar, Mohammed Rashidul
Mahant, Sanjay
Agbaje-Ojo, Toni
Mahood, Quenby
Borkhoff, Cornelia M.
Parkin, Patricia C.
Gill, Peter J.
Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review
title Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review
title_full Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review
title_short Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: A systematic review
title_sort diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for orbital cellulitis: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37410730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288011
work_keys_str_mv AT anwarmohammedrashidul diagnostictestaccuracyofultrasoundfororbitalcellulitisasystematicreview
AT mahantsanjay diagnostictestaccuracyofultrasoundfororbitalcellulitisasystematicreview
AT agbajeojotoni diagnostictestaccuracyofultrasoundfororbitalcellulitisasystematicreview
AT mahoodquenby diagnostictestaccuracyofultrasoundfororbitalcellulitisasystematicreview
AT borkhoffcorneliam diagnostictestaccuracyofultrasoundfororbitalcellulitisasystematicreview
AT parkinpatriciac diagnostictestaccuracyofultrasoundfororbitalcellulitisasystematicreview
AT gillpeterj diagnostictestaccuracyofultrasoundfororbitalcellulitisasystematicreview