Cargando…

Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data

Remote sensing data have been widely used to monitor crop development, grain yield, and quality, while precise monitoring of quality traits, especially grain starch and oil contents considering meteorological elements, still needs to be improved. In this study, the field experiment with different so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Weiwei, He, Qijin, Liu, Jiahong, Xiao, Xiao, Wu, Yaxin, Zhou, Sijia, Ma, Selimai, Wang, Rongwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1177477
_version_ 1785069274633601024
author Sun, Weiwei
He, Qijin
Liu, Jiahong
Xiao, Xiao
Wu, Yaxin
Zhou, Sijia
Ma, Selimai
Wang, Rongwan
author_facet Sun, Weiwei
He, Qijin
Liu, Jiahong
Xiao, Xiao
Wu, Yaxin
Zhou, Sijia
Ma, Selimai
Wang, Rongwan
author_sort Sun, Weiwei
collection PubMed
description Remote sensing data have been widely used to monitor crop development, grain yield, and quality, while precise monitoring of quality traits, especially grain starch and oil contents considering meteorological elements, still needs to be improved. In this study, the field experiment with different sowing time, i.e., 8 June, 18 June, 28 June, and 8 July, was conducted in 2018–2020. The scalable annual and inter-annual quality prediction model for summer maize in different growth periods was established using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), which combined hyperspectral and meteorological data. Compared with the multiple linear regression (MLR) using vegetation indices (VIs), the prediction accuracy of HLM was obviously improved with the highest R (2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) values of 0.90, 0.10, and 0.08, respectively (grain starch content (GSC)); 0.87, 0.10, and 0.08, respectively (grain protein content (GPC)); and 0.74, 0.13, and 0.10, respectively (grain oil content (GOC)). In addition, the combination of the tasseling, grain-filling, and maturity stages further improved the predictive power for GSC (R (2) = 0.96). The combination of the grain-filling and maturity stages further improved the predictive power for GPC (R (2) = 0.90). The prediction accuracy developed in the combination of the jointing and tasseling stages for GOC (R (2) = 0.85). The results also showed that meteorological factors, especially precipitation, had a great influence on grain quality monitoring. Our study provided a new idea for crop quality monitoring by remote sensing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10325687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103256872023-07-07 Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data Sun, Weiwei He, Qijin Liu, Jiahong Xiao, Xiao Wu, Yaxin Zhou, Sijia Ma, Selimai Wang, Rongwan Front Plant Sci Plant Science Remote sensing data have been widely used to monitor crop development, grain yield, and quality, while precise monitoring of quality traits, especially grain starch and oil contents considering meteorological elements, still needs to be improved. In this study, the field experiment with different sowing time, i.e., 8 June, 18 June, 28 June, and 8 July, was conducted in 2018–2020. The scalable annual and inter-annual quality prediction model for summer maize in different growth periods was established using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), which combined hyperspectral and meteorological data. Compared with the multiple linear regression (MLR) using vegetation indices (VIs), the prediction accuracy of HLM was obviously improved with the highest R (2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) values of 0.90, 0.10, and 0.08, respectively (grain starch content (GSC)); 0.87, 0.10, and 0.08, respectively (grain protein content (GPC)); and 0.74, 0.13, and 0.10, respectively (grain oil content (GOC)). In addition, the combination of the tasseling, grain-filling, and maturity stages further improved the predictive power for GSC (R (2) = 0.96). The combination of the grain-filling and maturity stages further improved the predictive power for GPC (R (2) = 0.90). The prediction accuracy developed in the combination of the jointing and tasseling stages for GOC (R (2) = 0.85). The results also showed that meteorological factors, especially precipitation, had a great influence on grain quality monitoring. Our study provided a new idea for crop quality monitoring by remote sensing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10325687/ /pubmed/37426960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1177477 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sun, He, Liu, Xiao, Wu, Zhou, Ma and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Sun, Weiwei
He, Qijin
Liu, Jiahong
Xiao, Xiao
Wu, Yaxin
Zhou, Sijia
Ma, Selimai
Wang, Rongwan
Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data
title Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data
title_full Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data
title_fullStr Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data
title_short Dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data
title_sort dynamic monitoring of maize grain quality based on remote sensing data
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1177477
work_keys_str_mv AT sunweiwei dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata
AT heqijin dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata
AT liujiahong dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata
AT xiaoxiao dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata
AT wuyaxin dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata
AT zhousijia dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata
AT maselimai dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata
AT wangrongwan dynamicmonitoringofmaizegrainqualitybasedonremotesensingdata