Cargando…
Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives
BACKGROUND: In the treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) the combination of Immuno- Oncotherapy (IO) and chemotherapy (CT) has been found to be superior to IO or CT alone for patients’ survival. Patients and clinicians are confronted with a preference sensitive choice between a more aggres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062830 |
_version_ | 1785069282051227648 |
---|---|
author | Oliveri, Serena Lanzoni, Lucilla Veldwijk, Jorien de Wit, G. Ardine Petrocchi, Serena Janssens, Rosanne Schoefs, Elise Smith, Meredith Y. Smith, Ian Nackaerts, Kristiaan Vandevelde, Marie Louis, Evelyne Decaluwé, Herbert De Leyn, Paul Declerck, Hanne Petrella, Francesco Casiraghi, Monica Galli, Giulia Garassino, Marina Chiara Girvalaki, Charis Huys, Isabelle Pravettoni, Gabriella |
author_facet | Oliveri, Serena Lanzoni, Lucilla Veldwijk, Jorien de Wit, G. Ardine Petrocchi, Serena Janssens, Rosanne Schoefs, Elise Smith, Meredith Y. Smith, Ian Nackaerts, Kristiaan Vandevelde, Marie Louis, Evelyne Decaluwé, Herbert De Leyn, Paul Declerck, Hanne Petrella, Francesco Casiraghi, Monica Galli, Giulia Garassino, Marina Chiara Girvalaki, Charis Huys, Isabelle Pravettoni, Gabriella |
author_sort | Oliveri, Serena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) the combination of Immuno- Oncotherapy (IO) and chemotherapy (CT) has been found to be superior to IO or CT alone for patients’ survival. Patients and clinicians are confronted with a preference sensitive choice between a more aggressive treatment with a greater negative effect on quality of life versus alternatives that are less effective but have fewer side effects. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (a) quantify patients’ preferences for relevant attributes related to Immuno-Oncotherapy treatment alternatives, and (b) evaluate the maximum acceptable risk (MAR)/Minimum acceptable benefit (MAB) that patients would accept for treatment alternatives. METHODS: An online preference survey using discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was completed by NSCLC patients from two hospitals in Italy and Belgium. The survey asked patients’ preferences for five patient- relevant treatment attributes. The DCE was developed using a Bayesian D-efficient design. DCE analyses were performed using mixed logit models. Information regarding patient demographics, health literacy, locus of control, and quality of life was also collected. RESULTS: 307 patients (158 Italian, 149 Belgian), stage I to IV, completed the survey. Patients preferred treatments with a higher 5-year survival chance as the most important attribute over all the other attributes. Preference heterogeneity for the attribute weights depended on health literacy, patients’ age and locus of control. Patients were willing to accept a substantially increased risks of developing side effects in exchange for the slightest increase (1%) in the chance of surviving at least 5 years from the diagnosis of cancer. Similarly, patients were willing to accept a switch in the mode of administration or complete loss of hair to obtain an increase in survival. CONCLUSION: In this study, the proportion of respondents who systematically preferred survival over all other treatment attributes was particularly high. Age, objective health literacy and locus of control accounted for heterogeneity in patients’ preferences. Evidence on how NSCLC patients trade between survival and other NSCLC attributes can support regulators and other stakeholders on assessing clinical trial evidence and protocols, based on patients’ conditions and socio-demographic parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10325723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103257232023-07-07 Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives Oliveri, Serena Lanzoni, Lucilla Veldwijk, Jorien de Wit, G. Ardine Petrocchi, Serena Janssens, Rosanne Schoefs, Elise Smith, Meredith Y. Smith, Ian Nackaerts, Kristiaan Vandevelde, Marie Louis, Evelyne Decaluwé, Herbert De Leyn, Paul Declerck, Hanne Petrella, Francesco Casiraghi, Monica Galli, Giulia Garassino, Marina Chiara Girvalaki, Charis Huys, Isabelle Pravettoni, Gabriella Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: In the treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) the combination of Immuno- Oncotherapy (IO) and chemotherapy (CT) has been found to be superior to IO or CT alone for patients’ survival. Patients and clinicians are confronted with a preference sensitive choice between a more aggressive treatment with a greater negative effect on quality of life versus alternatives that are less effective but have fewer side effects. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (a) quantify patients’ preferences for relevant attributes related to Immuno-Oncotherapy treatment alternatives, and (b) evaluate the maximum acceptable risk (MAR)/Minimum acceptable benefit (MAB) that patients would accept for treatment alternatives. METHODS: An online preference survey using discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was completed by NSCLC patients from two hospitals in Italy and Belgium. The survey asked patients’ preferences for five patient- relevant treatment attributes. The DCE was developed using a Bayesian D-efficient design. DCE analyses were performed using mixed logit models. Information regarding patient demographics, health literacy, locus of control, and quality of life was also collected. RESULTS: 307 patients (158 Italian, 149 Belgian), stage I to IV, completed the survey. Patients preferred treatments with a higher 5-year survival chance as the most important attribute over all the other attributes. Preference heterogeneity for the attribute weights depended on health literacy, patients’ age and locus of control. Patients were willing to accept a substantially increased risks of developing side effects in exchange for the slightest increase (1%) in the chance of surviving at least 5 years from the diagnosis of cancer. Similarly, patients were willing to accept a switch in the mode of administration or complete loss of hair to obtain an increase in survival. CONCLUSION: In this study, the proportion of respondents who systematically preferred survival over all other treatment attributes was particularly high. Age, objective health literacy and locus of control accounted for heterogeneity in patients’ preferences. Evidence on how NSCLC patients trade between survival and other NSCLC attributes can support regulators and other stakeholders on assessing clinical trial evidence and protocols, based on patients’ conditions and socio-demographic parameters. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10325723/ /pubmed/37425173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062830 Text en Copyright © 2023 Oliveri, Lanzoni, Veldwijk, de Wit, Petrocchi, Janssens, Schoefs, Smith, Smith, Nackaerts, Vandevelde, Louis, Decaluwé, De Leyn, Declerck, Petrella, Casiraghi, Galli, Garassino, Girvalaki, Huys and Pravettoni. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Oliveri, Serena Lanzoni, Lucilla Veldwijk, Jorien de Wit, G. Ardine Petrocchi, Serena Janssens, Rosanne Schoefs, Elise Smith, Meredith Y. Smith, Ian Nackaerts, Kristiaan Vandevelde, Marie Louis, Evelyne Decaluwé, Herbert De Leyn, Paul Declerck, Hanne Petrella, Francesco Casiraghi, Monica Galli, Giulia Garassino, Marina Chiara Girvalaki, Charis Huys, Isabelle Pravettoni, Gabriella Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives |
title | Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives |
title_full | Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives |
title_fullStr | Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives |
title_short | Balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives |
title_sort | balancing benefits and risks in lung cancer therapies: patient preferences for lung cancer treatment alternatives |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1062830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliveriserena balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT lanzonilucilla balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT veldwijkjorien balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT dewitgardine balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT petrocchiserena balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT janssensrosanne balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT schoefselise balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT smithmeredithy balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT smithian balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT nackaertskristiaan balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT vandeveldemarie balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT louisevelyne balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT decaluweherbert balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT deleynpaul balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT declerckhanne balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT petrellafrancesco balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT casiraghimonica balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT galligiulia balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT garassinomarinachiara balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT girvalakicharis balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT huysisabelle balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives AT pravettonigabriella balancingbenefitsandrisksinlungcancertherapiespatientpreferencesforlungcancertreatmentalternatives |